In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Influence of Tension Loading Protocol on Crack Cycling Tests on Undercut Anchors
Author(s): Akanshu Sharma, Vinay Mahadik, and Jan Hofmann
Publication: Structural Journal
Appears on pages(s): 779-790
Keywords: crack-cycling tests; seismic qualification; tension load cycling; undercut anchors
Abstract:Crack cycling tests govern the seismic approvals of most of the mechanical anchors. Currently, the guidelines recommend performing crack cycling tests with constant tension load for simplification of test setup. This assumption is deemed conservative. In this work, crack cycling tests on undercut anchors are performed with three different extremities of tension loading protocols—namely, 1) constant load during crack cycling; 2) load cycling in-phase with crack cycling; and 3) load cycling out-of-phase with crack cycling. The tests are performed on two different types of undercut anchors and are principally compared with the tests on headed studs available in literature. The results indicate that depending on the anchor type, the assumption of constant load during crack cycling may not always be conservative considering the displacement demands on the anchor. The in-phase crack and load cycling test is more realistic while being conservative from induced displacements viewpoint.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber