Title:
Freeze-Thaw Durability of GFRP and BFRP Rebars
Author(s):
Raphael Kampmann, Carolin Martens, Srichand Telikapalli, and Alvaro Ruiz Emparanza
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
678-690
Keywords:
basalt; glass; FRP; rebar; freeze-thaw cycles; durability; tensile strength; transverse shear strength; hori- zontal shear strength
DOI:
10.14359/51740656
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
While reinforced concrete is one of the most used construction materials, traditional reinforcement steel may cause undesirable side effects, as corrosion and the associated volume changes can lead to damages in the concrete matrix and can cause spalling, which may significantly reduce the load-bearing capacity and service life of structures. Alternative reinforcement methods, such as glass or basalt fiber reinforced polymer rebars, can serve as a viable alter-native to reduce or eliminate some of the disadvantages associated with steel reinforcement. In addition to an increased tensile strength and a reduction in weight, fiber reinforced polymer rebars also offer a high corrosion resistance among other beneficial properties. Because these materials are not fully regulated yet and the durability properties have not been conclusively determined, further research is needed to evaluate the material durability properties of FRP rebars. To determine the durability properties of GFRP and BFRP rebars in cold climates, the freeze-thaw resistance of these materials was evaluated throughout this study. Specifically, two types of materials (basalt and glass reinforced polymers) and two common rebar sizes (8 mm (#2) and 16 mm (#5) diameters) were tested. To quantify the freeze-thaw-durability, tensile tests according to ASTM D7205, transverse shear strength tests in line with ASTM D7617, and horizontal shear strength tests as specified in ASTM D4475 were conducted on numerous virgin fiber rebars and on fiber rebars that were subjected to 80 and 160 freeze-thaw cycles. While the results from the virgin materials served as benchmark values, the measurements and analysis from the aged (by freeze-thaw cycles) materials were used to quantify and determine the strength retention capacity of these bars. The results showed that a higher number of freeze-thaw cycles lead to lower strength retention for some rebar types. In addition, it was seen that rebar products respond differently to the aging process; while some material properties notably deteriorated, other material properties were insignificantly affected.
Related References:
1. ASTM-International (2017). Standard Specification for Solid Round Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, (ASTM D7957 / D7957M – 17). West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM-International (2023). Standard Specification for Basalt and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, (ASTM D8505/ D8505M – 23). West Conshohocken, PA.
3. ASTM International D2584 (2011). Standard Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins.
4. ASTM International D4475 (2008). Standard Test Method for Apparent Horizontal Shear Strength of Pultruded Reinforced Plastic Rods By the Short-Beam Method.
5. ASTM International D570 (2010). Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics.
6. ASTM International D7205 (2011). Matrix Composite Bars.
7. ASTM International D7617 (2011). Polymer Matrix Composite Bars.
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Standard Test Method for Transverse Shear Strength of Fiber-reinforced
8. ASTM International D7792 (2015). Standard Practice for FreezeThaw Conditioning of Pultruded Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites Used in Structural Designs.
9. AVK - Industrievereinigung Verstärkte Kunststoffe e. V. (Hrsg.) (2014). stoffe/Composites). 4. Auflage. Springer Vieweg.
10. Deutsche Basalt Faser GmbH (2022). From Stone to Fiber. (Handbuch Faserverbundkunst-
11. DIN EN 1992-1-1 (2021). Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken - Teil 1-1: Allgemeine Regeln - Regeln für Hochbauten, Brücken und Ingenieurbauwerke. Normenaustausch Bauwesen (NABau) in DIN, Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin.
12. Emparanza, A. R. (2016). “Performance evaluation of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars. masterthesis, Fachhochschule Münster, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida Department of Transportation, University of Miami.
13. European Pultrusion Technology Association (2023). Welcome to the World of Pultrusion.
14. Fiore, V., Scalici, T., Di Bella, G., and Valenza, A. (2015). “A review on basalt fibre and its composites.” Elsevier Composites Part B, 74, 74–94.
15. High, C., Seliem, H. M., El-Safty, A., and Rizkalla, S. H. (2015). “Use of basalt fibers for concrete structures.” Elsevier Construction and Building Materials, 96, 37–46.
16. Kocaoz, S., Samaranayake, V., and Nanni, A. (2004). “Tensile characterization of glass FRP bars.” Elsevier Composites Part B, 36, 127–134.
17. Lohse, W., Laumann, J., and Wolf, C. (2016). (Stahlbau 1 - Bemessung von Stahlbauten nach Eurocode mit zahlreichen Beispielen). 25. Auflage. Springer Vieweg.
18. Schöck Bauteile GmbH (2019). “Technische Information - Schöck Combar. Technisches Datenblatt. 19. Wallenberger, F. T., Watson, J. C., and Li, H. (2001). “Glass fibers.” ASM International, 21.
20. Wang, Z., Zhao, X.-L., Xian, G., Wu, G., Raman, R. S., Al-Saadi, S., and Haque, A. (2017). “Long-term durability of basalt- and glass-fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP/GFRP) bars in seawater and sea sand concrete environment.” Elsevier Construction and Building Materials, 139, 467–489.
21. Wei, B., Cao, H., and Song, S. (2010). “Tensile behavior contrast of basalt and glass fibers after chemical treatment.” Elsevier Materials and Design, 31, 4244–4250.
22. Yan, F., Lin, Z., Zhang, D., Gao, Z., and Li, M. (2016). “Experimental study on bond durability of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in concrete exposed to harsh environmental agents: Freeze-thaw cycles and alkaline-saline solution.” Elsevier Composites Part B, xxx, 1–16.