Title:
Stress-Strain Model of Concrete Confined by FRP Laminate and Spike Anchors
Author(s):
Zhibin Li, Enrique del Rey Castillo, Richard S. Henry, Kent A. Harries, Tongyue Zhang
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
582-601
Keywords:
Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), confined concrete, strengthening, axial stress-strain behavior, design methodology
DOI:
10.14359/51740650
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
The application of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) jacketing for confinement may not always be feasible, particularly in cases where adjacent elements obstruct the structural member and prevent wrapping. To address this issue, the utilization of FRP laminate and spike anchors has been proven as an alternative solution. This study focuses on proposing a design methodology for this particular application. A stress-strain model was developed to assess the behavior of concrete prisms confined with FRP laminates and spike anchors under axial compression. The model adopts a bi-parabola stress-strain curve, with the coefficients derived from previously published experimental data on concrete prisms confined using this solution. The comparison between the analytical and tested stress-strain curves yielded a coefficient of determination (R2) averaging at 0.96, demonstrating the effectiveness of the bi-parabola model in describing the tested stress-strain responses.
Related References:
1. Kam WY, Pampanin S, Elwood K. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand society for earthquake engineering. 2011;44:239-78.
2. Teng J, Chen J-F, Smith ST, Lam L. FRP: strengthened RC structures.2002.
3. Yamamoto T. FRP strengthening of RC columns for seismic retrofitting. Proc 10th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Balkema, 1992.
4. Li G. Experimental study of FRP confined concrete cylinders. Engineering structures. 2006;28:1001-8.
5. Wu G, Lü Z, Wu Z. Strength and ductility of concrete cylinders confined with FRP composites. Construction and building materials. 2006;20:134-48.
6. Smith ST, Kim SJ, Zhang H. Behavior and effectiveness of FRP wrap in the confinement of large concrete cylinders. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2010;14:573-82.
7. Kaneko T, Ujihashi S, Yomoda H, Inagi S. Finite element method failure analysis of a pressurized FRP cylinder under transverse impact loading. Thin-walled structures. 2008;46:898-904.
8. Lam L, Teng J. Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and building materials. 2003;17:471-89.
9. Ozbakkaloglu T. Axial compressive behavior of square and rectangular high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes. Journal of composites for Construction. 2013;17:151-61.
10. De Diego A, Arteaga A, Fernández J, Perera R, Cisneros D. Behaviour of FRP confined concrete in square columns. Materiales de Construcción. 2015;65:e069-e.
11. Lam L, Teng J. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular columns. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites. 2003;22:1149-86.
12. Harries KA, Carey SA. Shape and “gap” effects on the behavior of variably confined concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2003;33:881-90.
13. Carey SA, Harries KA. Axial behavior and modeling of confined small-, medium-, and large-scale circular sections with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer jackets. ACI structural journal. 2005;102:596.
14. Pessiki S, Harries KA, Kestner JT, Sause R, Ricles JM. Axial behavior of reinforced concrete columns confined with FRP jackets. Journal of composites for Construction. 2001;5:237-45.
15. Matthys S, Toutanji H, Audenaert K, Taerwe L. Axial load behavior of large-scale columns confined with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. ACI Structural Journal. 2005;102:258.
16. Wang ZY, Wang DY, Lu DG. Behavior of Large-Scale Circular and Square RC Columns Confined with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer under Uniaxial Compression. Advanced Materials Research, 2011. 3686-93.
17. Toutanji H, Han M, Gilbert J, Matthys S. Behavior of large-scale rectangular columns confined with FRP composites. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2010;14:62-71.
18. Wang Z, Wang D, Smith ST, Lu D. CFRP-confined square RC columns. I: Experimental investigation. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2012;16:150-60.
19. Mirmiran A, Shahawy M. A new concrete-filled hollow FRP composite column. Composites Part B: Engineering. 1996;27:263-8.
20. Spoelstra MR, Monti G. FRP-confined concrete model. Journal of composites for construction. 1999;3:143-50.
21. Fam AZ, Rizkalla SH. Confinement model for axially loaded concrete confined by circular fiberreinforced polymer tubes. Structural Journal. 2001;98:451-61.
22. Harries KA, Kharel G. Experimental investigation of the behavior of variably confined concrete. Cement and Concrete research. 2003;33:873-80.
23. Karbhari VM, Gao Y. Composite jacketed concrete under uniaxial compression—Verification of simple design equations. Journal of materials in civil engineering. 1997;9:185-93.
24. MIYAUCHI K, INOUE S, KURODA T, KOBAYASHI A. Strengthening effects of concrete column with carbon fiber sheet. Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute. 2000;21:143-50.
25. Lillistone D, Jolly C. An innovative form of reinforcement for concrete columns using advanced composites. Structural Engineer. 2000;78.
26. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2017. “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures.” ACI PRC 440.2-17. Farming Hills, Michigan, U.S.A.
27. del Rey Castillo E, Dizhur D, Griffith M, Ingham J. Strengthening RC structures using FRP spike anchors in combination with EBR systems. Composite Structures. 2019;209:668-85.
28. Li Z, del Rey Castillo E, Henry RS, Thompson A. Axial Behavior of Concrete Prisms Confined by FRP Laminate and Spike Anchors. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2022;26:04021058.
29. Li Z, del Rey Castillo E, Henry RS, Thompson A. Axial compression testing of concrete prisms confined by FRP spike anchors and estimation of failure modes. Composite Structures. 2023;322:117403.
30. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2023. “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures.” ACI PRC 440.2-23. Farming Hills, Michigan, U.S.A.
31. Li Z, del Rey Castillo E, Henry RS, Thompson A. Axial Compression Testing of Concrete Prisms Confined by FRP Spike Anchors and Estimation of Failure Modes. Composite structures (under review). 2023.
32. NZS (New Zealand Standards). 1986. “Methods of test for concrete – Tests relating to the determination of strength of concrete.” NZS 3112.2. Wellington.
33. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.” ACI 318-19 and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI.
34. Samaan M, Mirmiran A, Shahawy M. Model of concrete confined by fiber composites. Journal of structural engineering. 1998;124:1025-31.
35. Lam L, Teng J. Strength models for fiber-reinforced plastic-confined concrete. Journal of structural engineering. 2002;128:612-23.
36. NZS (New Zealand Standards). 2006. “Concrete structures standard.” NZS 3101. Wellington, New Zealand.
37. del Rey Castillo E, Kanitkar R, Smith ST, Griffith MC, Ingham JM. Design approach for FRP spike anchors in FRP-strengthened RC structures. Composite Structures. 2019;214:23-33.
38. Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of structural engineering. 1988;114:1804-26.
39. Long Y-L, Cai J. Stress–strain relationship of concrete confined by rectangular steel tubes with binding bars. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2013;88:1-14.
40. del Rey Castillo E, Kanitkar R, Smith S, Griffith M, Ingham J. Fan-to-sheet failure mode of FRP anchors. FRPRCS-14 Symposium: The 14th international Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced for Concrete Structure, Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen's University, 2019.
41. Zhang T. Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Walls in Pre-1970s Multi-Storey Buildings [thesis]. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland; 2019.
42. NZ Red Book. 2017. “The Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings.” NZSEE.
43. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2017. “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings.” ASCE/SEI 41-13.
44. NZS 1170. 2004. “Structural design actions.” Standards New Zealand Wellington. Wellington, New Zealand.
45. Li Z, del Rey Castillo E, Henry RS, Thompson A. Test data of concrete prisms confined by FRP laminate and spike anchors, 2021. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16713346.