In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Development Length for Large High Strength Reinforcing Bars
Author(s): Phil M. Ferguson and J. Neils Thompson
Publication: Journal Proceedings
Appears on pages(s): 71-94
Keywords: beam, bond strength, crack width, cracking, development length, high strength steel, reinforced concrete, research.
Abstract:Supplementing an earlier report on # 3, # 7, and a few # 11 bar beams, this investigation reports on 33 # 11 bar beams and seven # 18s bar beams, all of ASTM A431 steel having fY above the 75 kips per sq in. minimum. Bar cover, beam width, stirrup ratio, development length, and depth of concrete cast below the bar were the primary variables. Diagonal tension limitations, at much lower stresses than expected, complicated these tests and possibly lowered the recorded bond values. The previously reported decrease in bond resistance with increasing development length showed to be less significant for lengths greater than 50 in. and possibly the resistance even levels off. Crack width at service load seemed significant for these Large high strength bars when development lengths were above 40 in., but crack width seemed little worse for a 101- in. length with a # 18s bar than for a 50-in. length with a # 11 bar. was not helpful in reducing surface crack width. Ordinary stirrups offset the reduction of bond strength brought about by placing two bars in a beam (equivalent to a narrower beam per bar) but otherwise generally added little to bond Extra cover over the bar increased bond resistance but strength or crack width control.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber