In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Concrete Q & A: Construction Loads
Author(s): S.K. Ghosh
Publication: Concrete International
Appears on pages(s): 75-76
Abstract:We’re constructing a parking garage and want to place concrete in some interior columns by using a forklift to carry a concrete bucket. We will be running the forklift and loaded bucket on the newly completed elevated slab. The Engineer of Record (EOR) has indicated that the slab is designed for a live load of 50 psf (3 kPa) uniform load or 3000 lb (1350 kg) concentrated wheel load over a 20 in.2 (13,000 mm2) area. Also, the EOR will allow us to match, but not exceed, the controlling live load as a construction load. We can do this with a forklift that will raise the bucket to the desired height above the column by controlling the volume of concrete in the bucket so as not to exceed the live load.
The Construction Manager (CM) disapproves of this placing method and says we’ll be responsible for slab cracking due to construction loads that include the use of the forklift and loaded concrete bucket. We’re worried that the CM will hold us responsible for any flexural cracking if we put a forklift and loaded bucket on the slab. Are the responses by the EOR and CM compatible? Also, cracking caused by drying shrinkage, thermal contraction, or both is common but we fear this cracking too will be attributed to our use of the forklift for placing concrete. How can we protect ourselves against claims by the CM that we are responsible for repairing all cracks in the elevated slab?
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber