In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Comparison Between Interior and Exterior R/C Beam-Column Joint Behavior
Author(s): S. Fujii and S. Morita
Publication: Special Publication
Appears on pages(s): 145-166
Keywords: anchorage (structural); axial loads; beams (supports); columns (supports); earthquake-resistant structures; frames; hoops; joints (junctions); reinforced concrete; shear properties; tests; Structural Research
Abstract:Eight 1/3 scale specimens, consisting of four pairs of interior and exterior beam-column subassemblages in one-way frames, were tested. To investigate the basic joint shear strength, the test program was so determined that joint shear failure occurred in most specimens prior to beam yielding by using high-strength steel for beam bars. Test variables were beam bar strength, column axial load, and amount of joint hoop. The test results showed: 1) the increase of column axial load level from f'c / 12 to f'c / 4 did not influence the ultimate shear strength of the interior joints, but this increase in column axial load improved the shear strength of the exterior joints nearly 10 percent; 2) the ultimate shear strength represented in terms of nominal shear stress was f'c / 4 for interior joints; 3) when the shear strength of the exterior joints was evaluated on the basis of projected length of hooked beam bars instead of total column depth, nearly the same strength was obtained for both types of joint; 4) the increase of joint shear reinforcement ratio from 0.41 to 1.1 percent did not noticeably effect the behavior for both types of joint; 5) once joint shear strain reached to 0.5 percent degradation of shear rigidity was accelerated under subsequent load reversals.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber