In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Chat with Us Online Now
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Plastic Design of Slabs Using Equilibrium Methods
Author(s): R. H. Wood
Publication: Special Publication
Appears on pages(s): 319-346
Abstract:With Discussion by D. H. Clyde, M. P. Nielsen, and R. H. Wood. Yield-line theory for slab design as pioneered by Johansen, has always presented the designer with two alternative methods. The first method is to evaluate the dissipation of energy belonging to any chosen mode of collapse, from which the corresponding collapse load is obtained, the layout of yield lines for the worst mode being found by trial and error. This is known as the "work method" and is on a firm mathematical foundation, even if sometimes slow in application. The second method is the "equilibrium" method using "nodal" forces where yield lines meet, or where they meet edges. This quick method has been popular with designers, but the foundations of the theory are in dispute, and on occasions it gives false results or else provides no results at all. The reasons for breakdown are discussed herein and new techniques are evolved for overcoming the difficulties. In this new outlook there are not, in fact, two separate methods, but merely two mathematical rearrangements of the same approach. The argument brings out the observation that there is a disturbing lack of information on the yield criterion for bending of slabs.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber