International Concrete Abstracts Portal

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

Showing 1-5 of 248 Abstracts search results

Document: 

CI4807Khan

Date: 

July 1, 2026

Author(s):

Mohammad S. Khan

Publication:

Concrete International

Volume:

48

Issue:

7

Abstract:

Built in 1964, the John Coffee Memorial Bridge is a two-lane, 38-span, plate-girder bridge with a concrete deck that provides a direct route for travelers from Tennessee to Mississippi. Because of its scale, inspection is challenging. A recent evaluation was conducted to select appropriate restoration methods, using robotic tools that enabled nondestructive evaluations (NDEs) without the need for traffic control. This article describes these tools and summarizes the evaluation.

DOI:

10.14359/51751807


Document: 

CI4804Yu

Date: 

April 1, 2026

Author(s):

Jun Yu, Kunal Badheka, and David Campos

Publication:

Concrete International

Volume:

48

Issue:

4

Abstract:

The suspended concrete ceiling beneath the Helmsley Building at 230 Park Avenue, Manhattan, New York, NY, USA, was successfully restored after cracking and staining were observed during a façade inspection. This article discusses the repair of the nearly 100-year-old concrete assembly in a highly constrained urban environment.

DOI:

10.14359/51750638


Document: 

CI4710DCC

Date: 

October 1, 2025

Publication:

Concrete International

Volume:

47

Issue:

10

Abstract:

The success and longevity of cement-based overlays depend significantly on proper surface preparation. This article provides general guidance for successfully bonding cementious overlays to the concrete subbase. Basic steps of surface inspection and preparation are outlined.

DOI:

10.14359/51749216


Document: 

SP364_5

Date: 

December 1, 2024

Author(s):

Michael Pickett, Daniel Richey, Chris Moore, Joshua Umphrey, and Gordon Borne

Publication:

Symposium Papers

Volume:

364

Abstract:

Reinforced concrete sections have typically been the most used material for hardened protective construction due to their mass and the ductility provided by the reinforcement. The additional mass of these sections reduces deflections and increases dampening, which reduces vibrations. Even for the occasional occurrence of hardened steel structures, the foundation is comprised of reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete structures are hardened for a multitude of reasons. The most common include antiterrorism, force protection, equivalent protection for quantity distance arc violations, personnel protection, prevention of prompt propagation, asset protection, and elastic response during repeated intentional detonations. Many of the structures in the United States (US) used by the Department of Defense (DoD), to accommodate a rapid increase in production and storage of explosives were built during World War II (1941-1945). Facilities used for explosives production, maintenance, research and development (R&D), demolition, testing, and training are commonly referred to as Explosives Operating Locations (EOLs). This puts the average age of many of these facilities close to 80 years-old, which is past their originally intended service life. This paper presents a structural health and visual inspection (SHVI) technique developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Facilities Explosives Safety Mandatory Center of Expertise (FES MCX), the University of Oklahoma, and the Engineering Research and Development Center (ERDC) Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL) for the inspection of reinforced concrete Explosives Operations Location (EOL) facilities and live-fire training facilities [9]. This inspection process has been utilized to inspect over 1500 structures across multiple countries over the last decade and aid DoD installations in planning and budgeting for necessary repairs and future recapitalization priorities. This work does not include application to anti-terrorism or force protection in hardened structures for conventional weapon effects. This process has also been modified for use in live-fire training operations in concrete facilities and coupled with analyses to determine facility adequacy for explosives operations with desired charge weights, based on the given facility’s current structural health rating and its analyzed ability to remain elastic during repeated intentional detonations. The FES MCX partners with ERDC for concrete coring, materials analysis, and testing of samples to determine the estimated remaining service life of concrete structures based on the carbonation front of cored samples determined by the carbonation tests in relationship to the steel reinforcement. Examples of historical application will be given, and details provided on how these methods can lead to improved life-cycle cost for concrete structures and paired with design development criteria for optimal results.

DOI:

10.14359/51745457


Document: 

SP364_6

Date: 

December 1, 2024

Author(s):

Josh Umphrey, Chris Moore, Daniel Richey, Gordon Borne, and Michael Pickett

Publication:

Symposium Papers

Volume:

364

Abstract:

Reinforced concrete sections have typically been the most used material for hardened protective construction due to their mass and the ductility provided by the reinforcement. The additional mass of these sections reduces deflections and increases dampening, which reduces vibrations. Even for the occasional occurrence of hardened steel structures, the foundation is comprised of reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete structures are hardened for a multitude of reasons. Some of the most common include antiterrorism, force protection, equivalent protection for quantity distance arc violations, personnel protection, prevention of prompt propagation, asset protection, and elastic response during repeated detonations. Many of the structures used in the Department of Defense (DoD), for these purposes, were built in the United States (US) during the World War II era (1941-1945) for a rapid increase in production and storage of explosives. This puts the average age of many of these facilities at close to 80 years-old, which is past their originally intended service life. This paper presents a structural health and visual inspection technique developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineering and Support Center Huntsville (CEHNC) Facilities Explosives Safety Mandatory Center of Expertise (FES MCX) and the Engineering Research and Development Center (ERDC) Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL) for the inspection of reinforced concrete earth covered magazines (ECMs) [9]. This inspection process has been utilized to inspect over 1500 earth covered magazines across multiple countries over the last decade and aid DoD installations in planning and budgeting for concrete repairs and ECM replacements. The CEHNC FES MCX partners with ERDC for concrete coring and testing of samples to determine the estimated remaining service life of concrete structures based on the carbonation front of cored samples determined by the carbonation tests in relationship to the steel reinforcement. Examples of historical application will be given, and details provided on how these methods can lead to improved life-cycle cost and decision making.

DOI:

10.14359/51745458


12345...>>

Results Per Page