International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Previous research studies have been conducted to study the seismic response of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls when designed using normal-strength reinforcement (NSR) versus high-strength reinforcement (HSR). Such studies demonstrated that the use of HSR has the potential to address several constructability issues in nuclear construction practice by reducing the required steel areas and subsequently rebar congestion. However, the response of nuclear RC shear walls (i.e., aspect ratios of less than one) with both HSR and axial loads has not yet been evaluated under ground motion sequences. As such, most nuclear design standards restrict the use of HSR in nuclear RC shear wall systems. Such design standards do not consider the influence of axial loads when the shear strength capacity of such walls is calculated. To address this gap, the current study investigates the influence of axial load on the performance of nuclear RC shear walls with HSR when subjected to ground motion sequences using hybrid simulation testing and modelling assessment techniques. In this respect, two RC shear walls (i.e., W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL), with an aspect ratio of 0.83, are investigated. Wall W2-HSR-AL had an axial load of 3.5% of its axial compressive strength, while wall W1-HSR had no axial load. The test walls were subjected to a wide range of ground motion records, from operational basis earthquake (OBE) to beyond design basis earthquake (BDBE) levels. The experimental results of the walls are discussed in terms of their damage sequences, cracking patterns, ductility capacities, effective periods, and rebar strains. The test results are then used to develop and validate a numerical OpenSees model that simulates the seismic response of nuclear RC shear walls with different axial load levels. Finally, the experimental and numerical results are compared to the current ASCE 41-23 backbone model for RC shear walls. The experimental results demonstrate that walls W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL showed similar crack patterns and subsequent shear-flexure failures; however, the former had wider cracks relative to the former during the different ground motion records. In addition, the axial load reduced the displacement ductility of wall W2-HSR-AL by 18% compared to wall W1-HSR. Moreover, the ASCE 41-23 backbone model was not able to adequately capture the seismic response of the two test walls. The current study enlarges the experimental and numerical/analytical database pertaining to the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls with HSR to facilitate their adoption in nuclear construction practice.

Inverse analysis methods proposed by current standards for extracting the tensile properties of tension-hardening cementitious materials from indirect tension tests (e.g., flexural prism tests) are considered either cumbersome and can only be performed by skilled professionals 1,2 or apply to certain configurations and specimen geometries. Significant discrepancies are reported between the results of direct tension tests (DTT or DT tests) and inverse analysis methods. This has eroded confidence in flexural tests as a method of characterization of tension-hardening Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) and has motivated its abandonment in favor of DT testing. Additional concerns are size sensitivity, variability, and lack of robustness in the results of some methods. However, DT tests are even more difficult to conduct, and results are marked by notable scatter. This is why some codes allow for bending tests at least for quality control of UHPC. To address the limitations of the bending tests in providing an easy and quick method for reliable estimation of the tensile characteristic properties of UHPC, a new practical method is developed in this paper, based on a Forward Analysis (FA) of third-point bending tests. A unique aspect of the approach is that it considers the nonlinear unloading that occurs in the shear spans of the prism after strain localization in the critical region. The method was used to derive charts for direct estimation of the tensile properties from quality control bending tests, for the commonly used flexural specimen forms and material types. The goal of the study is to provide a practical alternative in the characterization of tension-hardening UHPC materials. Results obtained using the proposed FA method are in good agreement with the tensile response from DT tests. However, it is noted that due to the presence of a strain gradient in bending tests and the larger strain gauge lengths employed in some DT tests, the strain values at localization from DT tests tend to be more conservative.

Prefabricated structural wall buildings exhibit superior strength, stiffness, and ductility under seismic loading effects. Segmental wall construction is popular due to easy transportation and on-site assembly. The present study deals with the performance of precast wall elements connected through welded plates vertically subjected to seismic loading conditions. The study proposes welded plates with varying thickness to connect two structural walls on one or both faces. Full-scale quasi-static load tests were performed to analyze the seismic behavior of the connections. A conventional foundation with loading beams at top and bottom, to test the structural walls, was replaced with a special steel shoe setup, achieving real conditions, to minimize the testing cost. It was observed that the connections using mild steel plates achieve the most desirable characteristics such as plate yielding, energy dissipation, and ductility. High-strength steel plates failed in brittle mode with poor post-peak response, indicating precautions in selecting the type of connecting steel plates in precast construction. The proposed connecting plates improve the ductility and post-peak response for easy retrofitting of the precast wall system. The study brings out improvement in the seismic performance, selection of materials, and connection detailing for resilient precast structures.

This study introduces a new anchorage strategy using ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) to attach unbonded post- tensioning (PT) strands to existing foundations. This solution complements a seismic retrofit scheme investigated by the authors, which transforms nonductile cast-in-place reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls into unbonded PT rocking shear walls following concepts of selective weakening and self-centering. In the proposed PT anchorage scheme, mild steel reinforcements are inserted through the shear wall thickness and into the foundation. Subsequently, UHPC is cast around the wall base, forming a vertical extension connected to the foundation, which is used to anchor the unbonded PT strands. The feasibility and performance of the anchorage scheme was investigated through a combination of laboratory testing and numerical simulations. Pullout testing on four scaled-down anchorage specimens was conducted in the laboratory. Hairline cracks were observed in the UHPC during testing. Additionally, three-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) models were created, validated, and used to study the performance of the proposed anchorage scheme under lateral loading. The simulation results support the effectiveness of the proposed anchorage strategy.

This paper presents the implications of variable bond for the behavior of concrete beams with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars alongside shear-span-dependent load-bearing mechanisms. Experimental programs are undertaken to examine element- and structural-level responses incorporating fully and partially bonded reinforcing bars, which are intended to represent sequential bond damage. Conforming to published literature, three shear-span-to-depth ratios are taken into account: arch action, beam action, and a transition from arch to beam action. When sufficient bond is provided for the element-level testing, the interfacial failure of GFRP is brittle against a concrete substrate. An increase in the shear-span-to-depth ratio from 1.5 to 3.7, aligning with a change from arch action to beam action, decreases the load-carrying capacity of the beams by up to 40.2% and the slippage of the partially bonded reinforcing bar dominates their flexural stiffness. Compared with the case of the beams under beam action, the mutual dependency of the bond length and shear span is apparent for those under arch action. As far as failure characteristics are concerned, the absence of bond in the arch-action beam prompts crack localization; by contrast, partially bonded ones demonstrate diagonal tension cracking adjacent to the compression strut that transmits applied load to the nearby support. The developmental process of reinforcing bar stress is dependent on the shear-span-to-depth ratios, and, in terms of using the strength of GFRP, beam action is favorable relative to arch action. Analytical modeling suggests design recommendations, including degradation factors for the calculation of reinforcing bar stresses with bond damage when subjected to arch and beam actions.