International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Reinforced concrete members derive flexural strength from reinforcing steel, which acts together with the concrete to mobilize the required capacity. Design standards stipulate mandatory norms that must be complied with during the design process. Non-compliance with these provisions can increase the risk of corrosion, compromising the safety and integrity of the structure. Concrete protects the reinforcing steel against corrosion, but it can also become a contributing factor when its microstructure is poor due to non-compliance with these norms. Assessing the residual flexural capacity is essential for making informed decisions regarding repair or demolition. The proposed model in this paper enables computation of the reduction in flexural strength based either on gravimetric mass-loss percentage or on measured corrosion current density. A design chart is also proposed to facilitate practical application, enabling engineers to assess residual capacity and decide on repair or demolition.

This study examines the lateral cyclic response of a repaired damaged bridge pier originally reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars, particularly glass FRP (GFRP), as a corrosion-resistant and durable alternative to traditional steel. An as-built large-scale hybrid (GFRP-steel) reinforced concrete (RC) column had an outer cage reinforced with GFRP bars and an inner cage reinforced with steel reinforcing bars. The columns were first tested under cyclic lateral loading, where the hybrid specimen demonstrated ductility and energy dissipation capacity comparable to the conventional single-layer steel RC column. Following these initial tests, both specimens were repaired using FRP wraps and retested under the same loading protocol, resulting in a total of four tests. Enhanced structural integrity and energy dissipation demonstrate the effectiveness of innovative repair techniques in seismic engineering. These findings provide a blueprint for resilient infrastructure in earthquake-prone areas and contribute to advancements in bridge design and repair strategies.

This study presents a comprehensive review of eco-friendly materials and advanced repair techniques for rehabilitating reinforced-concrete (RC) structures, emphasizing their role in promoting sustainability and enhancing performance. By evaluating fifty-five research programs conducted between 2001 and 2024, the study focuses on emerging materials such as geopolymers, natural fibers, and fiber-reinforced composites, highlighting their mechanical properties, environmental benefits, and potential for integration into traditional RC systems. The review is thematically organized into four areas: (1) Sustainability and Environmental Impacts, (2) Material Innovation and Properties, (3) Repair Techniques and Efficiency, and (4) Structural Performance. Key findings reveal that these materials not only reduce the carbon footprint of construction but also significantly improve structural durability, corrosion resistance, and long-term performance under varying environmental conditions. Specifically, geopolymer concretes exhibit low CO₂ emissions and superior bond strength; bamboo and flax fibers offer strong tensile capacity with renewable sourcing; and MICP techniques deliver self-healing functionality that reduces dependency on chemical-based crack sealants. Additionally, the use of recycled and bio-based materials further contributes to cost-efficiency and environmental resilience, fostering circular economy principles. By synthesizing findings across these domains, this study provides practical insights into how eco-friendly materials can simultaneously address environmental, structural, and economic challenges in RC repair. The study underscores the importance of adopting innovative repair methods that incorporate these sustainable materials to address modern civil engineering challenges, balancing infrastructure longevity, sustainability, and reduced environmental impact.

This study investigates the ultimate flexural strength (UFS) of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP (RCB-SCFRP), focusing on the identification and quantification of flexural overstrength concerning the nominal flexural strength (NFS) as defined by ACI 440.2R. A total of 106 full-scale specimens tested were carefully selected from previous research, varying in concrete strength, reinforcement configurations, and CFRP materials from multiple manufacturers. Results show that ACI 440.2R provisions accurately and conservatively estimate the flexural capacity of CFRP-strengthened beams. Including CFRP transverse reinforcement (TR) resulted in a slight increase in UFS. The type of strengthening, whether preloaded and repaired or strengthened, had little effect on the UFS/NFS ratio. Steel reinforcement ratio (SRR) significantly influenced overstrength, with higher UFS/NFS ratios observed between 0.70% and 1.00% SRR. CFRP axial rigidity notably affected overstrength, with optimal performance between 0.10 and 0.50 GPa·mm. Deflection ductility was mainly affected by the rigidity of CFRP, with a 13% increase noted due to CFRP TR. A log-normal model was developed to estimate UFS for RCB-SCFRP beams based on experimental data and ACI 440.2R guidelines.

Geopolymer, an inorganic polymer material, has recently gained attention as an eco-friendly alternative to portland cement. Numerous studies have explored the potential of geopolymer as a primary structural material. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of geopolymer composites as repairing and strengthening materials rather than as structural materials. Data from 782 bond strength tests and 164 structural tests were collected and analyzed, including those on beams, beam-column connections, and walls. The analysis focused on critical factors affecting the bond strength of geopolymer composites with conventional cementitious concrete, and the structural behaviors of reinforced concrete members repaired or strengthened with these composites. The findings highlight the potential of geopolymer composites for enhancing the resilience and toughness of existing damaged or undamaged concrete structures. Additionally, they offer valuable insights into the key considerations for using geopolymer composites as repair or strengthening materials, providing a useful reference for future research in this field.