International Concrete Abstracts Portal

This study investigated the flexural behavior and seismic connection performance of precast lightweight aggregate concrete shear walls (PLCWs) using the relative emulation evaluation procedure specified in the Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). Six PLCW specimens connected through a bolting technique were prepared and tested under constant axial and cyclic lateral loads. In addition, three companion shear walls connected through the most commonly used spliced sleeve technique for precast concrete members were prepared to confirm the effectiveness of the bolting technique for the seismic connection performance. The main parameters were the concrete type (all-lightweight aggregate (ALWAC), sand-lightweight aggregate (SLWAC), and normal-weight concrete (NWC), the compressive strength of the concrete, and the connection technique. The test results showed that none of the specimens connected through the conventional spliced sleeve technique reached the allowable design drift ratio specified by the AIJ, indicating that the spliced sleeve is an unfavorable technique for obtaining a seismic connection performance of PLCWs equivalent to that of cast-in-place reinforced concrete shear walls. However, the specimens made of ALWAC or NWC and connected through the bolting technique not only reached the allowable design drift ratio specified by the AIJ but also satisfied the requirements of the seismic connection performance (lateral loads and allowable error at yield displacement) within the allowable design drift ratio. Consequently, the displacement ductility ratio of the specimens connected through the bolting technique was 1.52 times higher than that of the specimens connected through the conventional spliced sleeve technique, respectively. This difference was more prominent in the specimens made of ALWAC than in those made of SLWAC or NWC. Thus, the use of the bolting technique as a wall-to-base connection in shear walls can effectively achieve a seismic connection performance equivalent to that of cast-in-place shear walls while maintaining the medium ductility grades.

Biochar properties—in particular, its fineness and ability to absorbwater—can be exploited to modify the rheological behavior ofcementitious conglomerates and improve the hydration of cementpaste under adverse curing conditions, such as those related tothree-dimensional (3-D) concrete printing. Regarding the freshstateproperties, the study of rheological properties, conductedon cementitious pastes for different biochar additions (by weightof cement: 0, 1.5, 2, and 3%), highlights that the biochar inducesan increase in yield stress and plastic viscosity. The investigationof mechanical properties—in particular, flexural and compressivestrength—performed on mortars evidences the internal curingeffect promoted by biochar additions (by weight of cement: 0, 3,and 7.7%). In fact, compared to the corresponding specimens curedfor the first 48 hours in the formwork, specimens with biochar addition cured directly in air are characterized by a drastically lowerreduction in compressive strength than the reference specimens—that is, approximately 36% and 48%, respectively. This interestingresult can also be exploited in traditional construction techniqueswhere faster demolding is needed.

A capsule phase-change material (CPCM) was synthesizedusing n-tetradecane as the core, expanded graphite as the shell,and ethyl cellulose as the coating material through a controlledassembly process. The results demonstrate that the infiltration ofn-tetradecane significantly enhances the density of the expandedgraphite, while the ethyl cellulose coating effectively preventsthe desorption and leakage of the liquid phase-change materialduring phase transitions. As a result, the CPCM exhibits a compactstructure, chemical stability, and excellent thermal stability. Theincorporation of this CPCM into cement-based materials endowsthe material with an autonomous heat-release capability attemperatures below 5°C. When the CPCM content reaches 20%,the thermal conductivity of the cementitious matrix increases by24.66%. Moreover, the CPCM significantly improves the freezing- and-thawing resistance of the cement-based materials, reducingthe compressive strength loss by 96% and the flexural strengthloss by 65% after freezing-and-thawing cycles. This CPCM fundamentally enhances the frost resistance of cement-based materials, addressing the issue of freezing-and-thawing damage in concrete structures in cold regions.

Noncorrosive fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement presents an attractive alternative to conventional steel reinforcement, which is prone to corrosion, especially in harsh environments exposed to deicing salt or seawater. However, FRP reinforcing bars’ lower axial stiffness leads to greater crack widths when FRP reinforcing bars elongate, resulting in significantly lower flexural stiffness for FRP bar-reinforced concrete members. The deeper cracks and larger crack widths also reduce the depth of the compression zone. Consequently, both the aggregate interlock and the compression zone for shear resistance are significantly reduced. Additionally, due to their limited tensile ductility, FRP reinforcing bars can rupture before the concrete crushes, potentially resulting in sudden and catastrophic member failure. Therefore, ACI Committee 440 states that through a compression-controlled design, FRP reinforced concrete members can be intentionally designed to fail by allowing the concrete to crush before the FRP reinforcing bars rupture. However, this design approach does not yield an equivalent ductile behavior when compared to steel-reinforced concrete members, resulting in a lower strength reduction, ϕ, value of 0.65. In this regard, using FRP-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) members offer a novel solution, providing high strength, stiffness, ductility, and corrosion-resistant characteristics. UHPC has a very low water-cementitious materials ratio (0.18 to 0.25), which results in dense particle packing. This very dense microstructure and low water ratio not only improves compressive strength but delays liquid ingress. UHPC can be tailored to achieve exceptional compressive ductility, with a maximum usable compressive strain greater than 0.015. Unlike conventional designs where ductility is provided by steel reinforcing bars, UHPC can be used to achieve the required ductility for a flexural member, allowing FRP reinforcing bars to be designed to stay elastic. The high member ductility also justifies the use of a higher strength reduction factor, ϕ, of 0.9. This research, validated through large-scale experiments, explores this design concept by leveraging UHPC’s high compressive ductility, cracking resistance, and shear strength, along with a high quantity of noncorrosive FRP reinforcing bars. The increased amount of longitudinal reinforcement helps maintain the flexural stiffness (controlling deflection under service loads), bond strength, and shear strength of the members. Furthermore, the damage resistant capability of UHPC and the elasticity of FRP reinforcing bars provide a structural member with a restoring force, leading to reduced residual deflection and enhanced resilience.

Reinforced concrete (RC) structure design codes stipulate various design limits to prevent the brittle failure of members, as well as ensure serviceability. In the structural design of RC walls, the maximum shear strength is limited to prevent sudden shear failure due to concrete crushing before the yielding of shear reinforcement due to over-reinforcement. Despite the increase in wall shear strength provided by a compression strut, the maximum shear strength limit for walls in the ACI 318-19 Code is the same as the maximum torsional strength. Consequently, the shear strength of large-sized walls with high-strength concrete is limited to an excessively low level. The ACI 318-19, Eurocode 2, CSA-19, and JSCE-17 standards provide similar equations for estimating wall strength, but their maximum shear strength limits for walls are all different. In this study, experimental tests were conducted on nine RC wall specimens to evaluate the maximum shear strength. The main variables of the specimens were shear reinforcement ratio, compressive strength of concrete, and failure mode. The experimental results showed that the maximum load was reached after yielding of shear reinforcement, even when the shear reinforcement ratio was 1.5 times higher than the maximum shear reinforcement ratio specified in the ACI 318-19 code. In addition, the measured shear crack width of all specimens at the service load level was less than 0.42 mm (0.017 in.). The shear strength limits for walls in the current codes were compared using 109 experimental results failing in shear before flexural yielding or shear friction failure, assembled from the literature. The comparison indicated that the ACI 318-19 Code limit underestimates the maximum shear strength of walls, and it particularly underestimates the maximum shear strength of walls with high-strength concrete or barbell-shaped cross sections. Additionally, this study proposes an equation for estimating the maximum shear strength limit of walls based on the truss model. The proposed equation predicted the maximum shear strength of RC walls with reasonable accuracy.