International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Advances in concrete material science have led to the development of a new class of cementitious materials, namely ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), which offers superior mechanical and durability properties. The control and characterization of the fresh properties of UHPC are crucial for successful mixture design. Among the methods for evaluating these properties, the mini-cone test has gained prominence due to its practicality. It requires smaller sample volumes than the standard slump cone test, making it especially suited for laboratory assessments of UHPC mixtures. In contrast, the slump flow test is the simplest and most widely used test for both laboratory and field testing of concrete. This study aims to establish a correlation between mini-cone flow and standard slump flow test results. A linear relationship is identified, which forms the basis for proposing consistency classes for UHPC using mini-cone flow values. These proposed classes align with the established consistency classifications for self-compacting concrete.

As global demand for concrete has been forecasted to continue rising, one of the approaches toward more sustainable construction is the adoption of mixture designs that replace conventional ones. The current study contains a comparison between concrete mixtures that constitute only ordinary portland cement (OPC) and mixtures incorporating 25% OPC with a 75% replacement by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). The major experimental hypothesis focuses on investigating whether it is effective to use thermal treatment under moderately elevated temperatures to enhance physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Comparisons were performed using mechanical tests such as compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength, and through several nondestructive physical experiments, as well as microstructural investigation using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). In conclusion, the experimental results showed a mostly positive influence, observing significant enhancements after thermal treatment. However, treated concrete mixtures that constitute only OPC seem to excel in overall performance compared to those incorporating SCMs.

The term “mass concrete” characterizes a specific concrete condition that typically requires unique considerations to mitigate extreme temperature effects on a structure. Mass concrete has historically been defined by the physical dimensions of a massive concrete element with the intent of identifying when differential temperatures may induce early-onset cracking, leading to reduced service life. More recently, in addition to differential temperature considerations, extreme upper temperature limits have been imposed by the American Concrete Institute to prevent long-term concrete degradation. Studies dating back to 2007 show that shafts as small as 48 in. (1.2 m) in diameter can exceed both differential and peak temperature limits; in 2020, augered cast-in-place piles as small as 30 in. (0.76 m) in diameter exceeded one or both limits. This suggests the term “mass concrete” is misleading when considering today’s high-early-strength or high-performance mixture designs. This study applies numerical modeling coupled with field measurements to investigate the effects of concrete mixture design, drilled shaft diameter, and environmental conditions on heat energy production and temperature. Further, the outcome of this study focuses on developing criteria that combine the effects of both size and cementitious material content to determine whether unsafe temperature conditions may arise for a given drilled shaft design.

The use of recycled plastic aggregate in cement-based materials has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce plastic waste and promote sustainable construction. However, the inherent hydrophobicity of plastic surfaces poses a significant challenge by limiting their bonding with the cement matrix. This review critically examines five major surface treatment methods, such as coating, oxidation, silane, plasma, and radiation, to enhance the compatibility of recycled plastic aggregates in cementitious composites. Coating with materials such as waterglass, slag powder, or acrylic resins improved compressive strength by up to 78% depending on the coating type. Oxidation using hydrogen peroxide or calcium hypochlorite increased hydrophilicity and improved strength by approximately 10%–30%, while excessive treatment with NaOH-hypochlorite mixtures reduced strength by up to 60%. Silane treatment significantly enhanced surface bonding, resulting in improved mechanical properties. Plasma treatment demonstrated high efficiency, reducing contact angles from ~108° to 44.0° within 30 seconds. Radiation treatment using gamma rays and microwaves increased surface roughness and strength, with gamma irradiation at 100–200 kGy leading to substantial improvements in compressive strength and surface morphology. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review to systematically compare the effectiveness, mechanisms, and limitations of these surface treatments specifically for recycled plastic aggregates in cement-based materials. This review also highlights the practical challenges of scaling such treatments, including energy demand, chemical handling, and cost, and identifies future directions such as bio-based coatings and nanomaterial functionalization. The findings provide critical insight into optimizing surface treatments to improve the mechanical performance, durability, and sustainability of concrete incorporating plastic aggregates, supporting their broader adoption in sustainable construction practices.

Inverse analysis methods proposed by current standards for extracting the tensile properties of tension-hardening cementitious materials from indirect tension tests (e.g., flexural prism tests) are considered either cumbersome and can only be performed by skilled professionals 1,2 or apply to certain configurations and specimen geometries. Significant discrepancies are reported between the results of direct tension tests (DTT or DT tests) and inverse analysis methods. This has eroded confidence in flexural tests as a method of characterization of tension-hardening Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) and has motivated its abandonment in favor of DT testing. Additional concerns are size sensitivity, variability, and lack of robustness in the results of some methods. However, DT tests are even more difficult to conduct, and results are marked by notable scatter. This is why some codes allow for bending tests at least for quality control of UHPC. To address the limitations of the bending tests in providing an easy and quick method for reliable estimation of the tensile characteristic properties of UHPC, a new practical method is developed in this paper, based on a Forward Analysis (FA) of third-point bending tests. A unique aspect of the approach is that it considers the nonlinear unloading that occurs in the shear spans of the prism after strain localization in the critical region. The method was used to derive charts for direct estimation of the tensile properties from quality control bending tests, for the commonly used flexural specimen forms and material types. The goal of the study is to provide a practical alternative in the characterization of tension-hardening UHPC materials. Results obtained using the proposed FA method are in good agreement with the tensile response from DT tests. However, it is noted that due to the presence of a strain gradient in bending tests and the larger strain gauge lengths employed in some DT tests, the strain values at localization from DT tests tend to be more conservative.