International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The term “mass concrete” characterizes a specific concrete condition that typically requires unique considerations to mitigate extreme temperature effects on a structure. Mass concrete has historically been defined by the physical dimensions of a massive concrete element with the intent of identifying when differential temperatures may induce early-onset cracking, leading to reduced service life. More recently, in addition to differential temperature considerations, extreme upper temperature limits have been imposed by the American Concrete Institute to prevent long-term concrete degradation. Studies dating back to 2007 show shafts as small as 48 in. (1.2 m) in diameter can exceed both differential and peak temperature limits; in 2020, augered cast-in-place piles as small as 30 in. (0.76 m) in diameter exceeded one or both limits. This suggests the term “mass concrete” is misleading when considering today’s high-early-strength or high-performance mix designs. This study applies numerical modeling coupled with field measurements to investigate the effects of concrete mix design, drilled shaft diameter, and environmental conditions on heat energy production and temperature. Further, the outcome of this study focuses on developing criteria that combine the effects of both size and cementitious material content to determine whether unsafe temperature conditions may arise for a given drilled shaft design.

This paper presents the implications of variable bond for the behavior of concrete beams with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars alongside shear-span-dependent load-bearing mechanisms. Experimental programs are undertaken to examine element- and structural-level responses incorporating fully and partially bonded reinforcing bars, which are intended to represent sequential bond damage. Conforming to published literature, three shear-span-to-depth ratios are taken into account: arch action, beam action, and a transition from arch to beam action. When sufficient bond is provided for the element-level testing, the interfacial failure of GFRP is brittle against a concrete substrate. An increase in the shear-span-to-depth ratio from 1.5 to 3.7, aligning with a change from arch action to beam action, decreases the load-carrying capacity of the beams by up to 40.2% and the slippage of the partially bonded reinforcing bar dominates their flexural stiffness. Compared with the case of the beams under beam action, the mutual dependency of the bond length and shear span is apparent for those under arch action. As far as failure characteristics are concerned, the absence of bond in the arch-action beam prompts crack localization; by contrast, partially bonded ones demonstrate diagonal tension cracking adjacent to the compression strut that transmits applied load to the nearby support. The developmental process of reinforcing bar stress is dependent on the shear-span-to-depth ratios, and, in terms of using the strength of GFRP, beam action is favorable relative to arch action. Analytical modeling suggests design recommendations, including degradation factors for the calculation of reinforcing bar stresses with bond damage when subjected to arch and beam actions.

Engineered cementitious composite (ECC), a prominent innovation in the realm of concrete materials in recent years, contains a substantial amount of cement in its composition, thereby resulting in a significant environmental impact. To enhance the environmental sustainability of ECC, it is plausible to substitute a large portion of cement in the composition with fly ash, a by-product of coal-fired power plants. Recent years have seen increased research in ECC containing high-volume fly ash (HVFA) binder and its wider application in construction practices. In this particular context, it becomes imperative to review the role of HVFA binder in ECC. This review first examines the effects of incorporating HVFA binder in ECC on the fiber dispersion and fiber-matrix interface behavior. Additionally, mechanical properties, including compressive strength, tensile behavior, and cracking behavior under loading, as well as durability performances of HVFA-based ECC under various exposure conditions, are explored. Last, this review summarizes the research needs pertaining to HVFA-based ECC, proving valuable guidance for future endeavors in this field.

This paper presents the effectiveness of various reinforcing schemes in the end zones of prestressed concrete bulb-tee girders. The default girder, provided by a local transportation agency, includes C-bars and spirals intended to control cracking, and is analyzed using three-dimensional finite element analysis. The formulated models are used to evaluate the breadth of end zones, strain responses, cracking patterns, damage amounts, and splitting forces, depending upon the configuration of the end-zone reinforcement. The number of C-bars is not influential in developing strand stress along the girder. The maximum principal stresses exceed the conventional limit within h/4 of the girder end, where h is the girder depth; however, the 3h/4 limit adequately encompasses the stress profiles, particularly in the web of the girder. The maximum tensile strain in the concrete varies with the elevation of the girder, and the inclined strands cause local compression in the C-bars, while spiral strains are independent of the number of bars. By positioning the C-bars, the vertical strain of the concrete decreases by more than 15.9%, which can minimize crack formation. Whereas the short-term crack width of the girder may not be an immediate concern, its long-term width is found to surpass the established limit of 0.18 mm (0.007 in.). In this regard, multiple C-bars should be placed to address concerns about undesirable cracking. The splitting cracks in the girder, resulting from the strand angles and eccentricities, can be properly predicted by published specifications within the range of 0.2h to 0.7h, beyond which remarkable discrepancies are observed in comparison with a refined approach. From a practical perspective, two to three No. 6 or No. 7 C-bars spaced 150 mm (6 in.) apart are recommended in the end zones alongside welded wire fabric.

Noncorrosive fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement presents an attractive alternative to conventional steel reinforcement, which is prone to corrosion, especially in harsh environments exposed to deicing salt or seawater. However, FRP reinforcing bars’ lower axial stiffness leads to greater crack widths when FRP reinforcing bars elongate, resulting in significantly lower flexural stiffness for FRP bar-reinforced concrete members. The deeper cracks and larger crack widths also reduce the depth of the compression zone. Consequently, both the aggregate interlock and the compression zone for shear resistance are significantly reduced. Additionally, due to their limited tensile ductility, FRP reinforcing bars can rupture before the concrete crushes, potentially resulting in sudden and catastrophic member failure. Therefore, ACI Committee 440 states that through a compression-controlled design, FRP reinforced concrete members can be intentionally designed to fail by allowing the concrete to crush before the FRP reinforcing bars rupture. However, this design approach does not yield an equivalent ductile behavior when compared to steel-reinforced concrete members, resulting in a lower strength reduction, ϕ, value of 0.65. In this regard, using FRP-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) members offer a novel solution, providing high strength, stiffness, ductility, and corrosion-resistant characteristics. UHPC has a very low water-cementitious materials ratio (0.18 to 0.25), which results in dense particle packing. This very dense microstructure and low water ratio not only improves compressive strength but delays liquid ingress. UHPC can be tailored to achieve exceptional compressive ductility, with a maximum usable compressive strain greater than 0.015. Unlike conventional designs where ductility is provided by steel reinforcing bars, UHPC can be used to achieve the required ductility for a flexural member, allowing FRP reinforcing bars to be designed to stay elastic. The high member ductility also justifies the use of a higher strength reduction factor, ϕ, of 0.9. This research, validated through large-scale experiments, explores this design concept by leveraging UHPC’s high compressive ductility, cracking resistance, and shear strength, along with a high quantity of noncorrosive FRP reinforcing bars. The increased amount of longitudinal reinforcement helps maintain the flexural stiffness (controlling deflection under service loads), bond strength, and shear strength of the members. Furthermore, the damage resistant capability of UHPC and the elasticity of FRP reinforcing bars provide a structural member with a restoring force, leading to reduced residual deflection and enhanced resilience.