International Concrete Abstracts Portal

In this study, the behavior of diaphragm-to-wall connections with collector reinforcement and construction joints was investigated. Four slab-to-wall connection specimens were tested under cyclic loading. Diaphragm connection details, such as shear friction reinforcement (i.e., slab dowel bars anchored by 90-degree hooks within the wall) and the use of spandrel beams as collectors, were considered as test variables. When fabricating the specimens, concrete was consecutively cast for the wall and slab, and construction joints were placed on the sides of the wall and spandrel beams. The tests showed that the diaphragm connections exhibited the typical ductile behavior characterized by the robust initial stiffness and subsequent post-yield plastic behavior. Before concrete failure on the front of the wall, the load transfer from the diaphragm to the wall was governed by a nodal zone action; then, the subsequent connection behavior was dominated by shear friction as sliding failure occurred on the side of the wall along the slab construction joints. The diaphragm-to-wall connection strengths were evaluated using the strut-and-tie model and shear friction theory. The calculated strengths were in good agreement with the test strengths. Based on the investigation results, design considerations of the diaphragm-to-wall connection were proposed.

Several studies have revealed that slabs with cast-in-place over precast, prestressed panels (CIP-PCP) behave differently from traditional concrete slabs because of the panel joints between the PCP components. While high-strength reinforcing bars can improve load capacity or reduce reinforcing bar quantity in traditional slabs, limited research has focused on their application in CIP-PCP slabs. This study addressed this gap by conducting four-point bending tests on CIP-PCP slabs with normal- and high-strength reinforcing bars. Two configurations of high-strength steel were used: one with the same reinforcing bar layout as normal-strength reinforcing bars and another with increased reinforcing bar spacing to reduce the reinforcing bar quantity. Additionally, slab specimens were designed to replicate real-world bridge deck conditions, including longitudinal and transverse joints, for detailed analysis. The results indicated that reducing reinforcing bar quantity by adjusting reinforcing bar spacing based on the specified yield strength ratio between normal- and high-strength steels maintained a comparable load capacity, with crack widths magnitude similar to those in normal-strength steel layout in the service state.

Although the issue of progressive collapse has been significantly studied within the broader field of structural engineering, the literature on the analysis and design of connections in precast concrete cross-wall buildings is rather limited. This study aims to investigate the progressive collapse behaviour of a typical precast floor-to-floor system, considering the pull-out failure mode of the deformed bar into grouted keyways of slabs at the joints. To do so, the pull-out behaviour of deformed bars in grouted keyways of the connections was first experimentally studied. Subsequently, by integrating the pull-out force-displacement data with findings from full-scale floor-to-floor experiments, an approximate analytical approach was formulated and validated to estimate the resistance to progressive collapse. The findings reveal that the floor-to-floor system, when subjected to the pull-out failure mode following the removal of a wall support, demonstrates a secondary peak strength and considerable ductility in contrast to the bar fracture failure mode.

This paper reports results from four large-scale interior beam column connections without transverse beams or slabs tested under reversed cyclic displacements. The specimens, which included the first of interior beam-column connections constructed with Grade 100 (690) reinforcement with bar deformations similar to those available in U.S. practice, had Grade 60 or 100 (420 or 690) bars, 4 or 10 ksi (28 or 69 MPa) concrete, and varied column depthto-beam bar diameter ratios. The specimens all exhibited strengths greater than the nominal strength, retained at least 80% of their strength to drift ratios exceeding 5%, and exceeded ACI 374 acceptance criteria at a 3% drift ratio for components of special moment frames, demonstrating that well-detailed joints constructed with high-strength materials behave satisfactorily. The data add evidence that joints constructed with high-strength concrete exhibit less bond decay, and recommendations are made for accounting for this effect in design. Results from the specimen constructed with normal-strength materials, considered in the context of prior tests, suggest a need to increase the minimum joint depth for special moment frames. Considerable improvement in behavior associated with reduced bond damage within the joint is obtained from a 20% increase in the minimum column depth-to-beam bar diameter ratio required in ACI 318-19.

One-story concrete moment frame buildings present critical joints because free horizontal faces reduce their confinement in the core, affecting the anchorage of the top beam reinforcement and producing joint distress. In addition, precast concrete processes that involve prestressed beams with different shapes, precast concrete columns, construction of joints on the jobsite, and special construction details such as a reinforced topping on top of the beam joints could affect the seismic performance of one-story precast moment frames for industrial buildings. Due to the lack of experimental testing, six full-scale critical connections were cyclically tested to allow understanding of their seismic performance. Test specimens include one precast reinforced column, three knee joints, and two interior joint sub-assemblages that were designed based on ACI 318. All connections sustained at least a 3.5% drift ratio with no beam longitudinal reinforcement bar rupture or buckling and very low or no observed damage of the column and minimal joint distress, which is consistent with the strong-column/weak-beam design philosophy. The performance acceptance criteria of ACI 374.1 was satisfied by all test specimens in terms of stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation. Nonetheless, the presence of the reinforced topping slab on the top of the joint plays a role in achieving slightly better strength, ductility, and hysteretic performance response.