International Concrete Abstracts Portal

This study evaluated the effect of class F fly ash (5, 10, 15, and 20%) and silica fume (20%) as partial cement replacements on bacterial crack healing. Concrete cylinders were prepared, cracked into one-inch disks, and submerged in fresh water. Healing progress was monitored over 18 weeks using microscopy and quantified through a healing index. Results showed that bacterial activity substantially improved healing compared to natural hydration in control specimens. Fly ash replacement did not prevent healing, and several disks across all percentages achieved complete crack closure. However, higher fly ash levels shortened the duration of bacterial activity, indicating sensitivity to calcium availability. At 20% fly ash, healing progressed more slowly but remained active at 18 weeks. In contrast, specimens containing 20% silica exhibited significantly lower healing efficiency, with few disks achieving full closure and overall lower healing indices. These results confirm that bacteria-based self-healing concrete remains effective with fly ash but is constrained by high silica fume content due to very low to zero calcium content in silica fume. The findings indicated that lower calcium content in supplementary cementitious material (SCM) replacement, either due to higher fly ash content with lower calcium compared to OPC or with silica fume with almost zero calcium content, with bacteria, may have a significant effect on the healing progress.

A slag-based zero-cement concrete (ZC) was newly developed as an alternative, eco-friendly material to Portland cement concrete. To investigate the bond performance between ZC and steel reinforcing bars, lap splice tests were conducted for ZC beams. Fourteen beams (two cementitious normal concrete (NC) beams and twelve ZC beams) were tested at the ages of 6 days (45 MPa (6.53 ksi)) and 28 days (60 MPa (8.7 ksi)). For steel reinforcement, Grade 600 MPa (87.0 ksi) reinforcing bars were used. The test parameters included the concrete type, concrete strength (i.e., concrete age), reinforcing bar diameter, concrete cover thickness, ratio of actual lap splice length to required lap splice length, and use of stirrups. The test results showed that the performance of ZC beams was comparable to that of the counterpart NC beams in terms of moment–deflection relationship, damage mode, and reinforcing bar stress at the peak load. This result indicates that the bond performance of ZC was equivalent to that of NC with identical compressive strength. The bar development length specified in current design codes safely predicted the reinforcing bar stress of the ZC beams at failure: current design codes are applicable to the reinforcing bar development length design of ZC members.

Advances in concrete material science have led to the development of a new class of cementitious materials, namely ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), which offers superior mechanical and durability properties. The control and characterization of the fresh properties of UHPC are crucial for successful mixture design. Among the methods for evaluating these properties, the mini-cone test has gained prominence due to its practicality. It requires smaller sample volumes than the standard slump cone test, making it especially suited for laboratory assessments of UHPC mixtures. In contrast, the slump flow test is the simplest and most widely used test for both laboratory and field testing of concrete. This study aims to establish a correlation between mini-cone flow and standard slump flow test results. A linear relationship is identified, which forms the basis for proposing consistency classes for UHPC using mini-cone flow values. These proposed classes align with the established consistency classifications for self-compacting concrete.

As global demand for concrete has been forecasted to continue rising, one of the approaches toward more sustainable construction is the adoption of mixture designs that replace conventional ones. The current study contains a comparison between concrete mixtures that constitute only ordinary portland cement (OPC) and mixtures incorporating 25% OPC with a 75% replacement by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). The major experimental hypothesis focuses on investigating whether it is effective to use thermal treatment under moderately elevated temperatures to enhance physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Comparisons were performed using mechanical tests such as compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength, and through several nondestructive physical experiments, as well as microstructural investigation using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). In conclusion, the experimental results showed a mostly positive influence, observing significant enhancements after thermal treatment. However, treated concrete mixtures that constitute only OPC seem to excel in overall performance compared to those incorporating SCMs.

The term “mass concrete” characterizes a specific concrete condition that typically requires unique considerations to mitigate extreme temperature effects on a structure. Mass concrete has historically been defined by the physical dimensions of a massive concrete element with the intent of identifying when differential temperatures may induce early-onset cracking, leading to reduced service life. More recently, in addition to differential temperature considerations, extreme upper temperature limits have been imposed by the American Concrete Institute to prevent long-term concrete degradation. Studies dating back to 2007 show that shafts as small as 48 in. (1.2 m) in diameter can exceed both differential and peak temperature limits; in 2020, augered cast-in-place piles as small as 30 in. (0.76 m) in diameter exceeded one or both limits. This suggests the term “mass concrete” is misleading when considering today’s high-early-strength or high-performance mixture designs. This study applies numerical modeling coupled with field measurements to investigate the effects of concrete mixture design, drilled shaft diameter, and environmental conditions on heat energy production and temperature. Further, the outcome of this study focuses on developing criteria that combine the effects of both size and cementitious material content to determine whether unsafe temperature conditions may arise for a given drilled shaft design.