International Concrete Abstracts Portal

It can be demonstrated that performance-based seismic design of post-installed anchors in accordance with ACI 318 is not possible by using the anchor qualification information provided by ACI 355. The current state-of-the-art anchor qualification does not provide capacities that reflect actual earthquake responses in seismic design scenarios. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis and highlights the gaps in the current approach. A performance-based framework is proposed as the basis of future developments in seismic design and qualification of post-installed anchors. It is demonstrated that the approach is fully transparent and provides the possibility to identify key driving parameters that need further experimental investigation. The approach acknowledges that performance-based seismic design of post-installed anchors needs an understanding of the seismic damage of the concrete-anchor system. Currently, no design tools are available to predict this damage. The proposed framework adopts the theory of the accumulated damage potential (ADP) as a damage parameter. It is demonstrated that the selected damage parameter is simple but meaningful enough to represent the seismic damage of the concrete-anchor system at the design level. Possibilities for future development of the approach is explored, and directions for the next steps are suggested. It is highlighted that a definition of a framework for realistic seismic performance objectives of post-installed anchors is needed for the development of design tools in the future. The proposed framework has great practical significance and may help fill a gap in the seismic design of post-installed anchors. Promoting a transparent framework that is driven by the needs of performance-based seismic design may help develop a feasible qualification system and replace the currently used pass-or-fail assessment approach that is not suitable to provide anchor capacities for performance-based seismic design.

Industrial facilities (such as offshore platforms, power plants, and treatment plants) are typically labyrinthine structures because they possess intricate layouts (resembling mazes or labyrinths), and most of their structural walls are interconnected. These reinforced concrete (RC) structural walls need to be designed for eight simultaneous demands. The existing US codes provide limited procedural guidance for the design of these walls. A novel Panel-based ACI (PACI) design approach for RC walls, rooted in the design concepts and formulations of ACI 349 and ACI 318.2, is proposed. The PACI approach is validated using two validation and verification (V&V) approaches. For the first V&V approach, existing experimental data is used to estimate PACI approach-based reinforcement areas, which are then compared against the reinforcements provided in the experiments (and against the reinforcement areas suggested by the EC2 sandwich model approach). Benchmarked numerical models are developed to compare the capacities of specimens using PACI-based reinforcements with experimentally observed capacities and with EC2-based reinforcement. For the second V&V approach, analytical data of publicly available design demands for real-world structures are used to estimate PACI-based reinforcements for a critical region of a nuclear power plant. Numerical models are developed to compare the capacities of the panels with PACI-based reinforcements against the design demands. The results from V&V1 approach showed that the PACI approach: (i) suggests similar reinforcement areas than those used in the experiments, with an average ratio of PACI suggested reinforcement areas over experimental provided areas of 0.97 for all 21 tests; and (ii) suggests similar reinforcement areas that those suggested by the EC2 approach, with an average ratio of EC2 based reinforcement areas, over PACI based reinforcement of 1.01 for all 21 tests as well. For the V&V2 approach, the numerical capacities of the models with PACI suggested reinforcements are greater than or equal to the design demands. The V&V studies illustrate that, despite its methodological simplicity, the PACI approach results in reinforcement recommendations that closely approximate the outcomes derived from the more rigorous procedures inherent to the EC2 approach. The design implementation of the PACI approach is also illustrated using a sample calculation.

Eleven large-scale reinforced concrete beams were tested to failure under four-point bending to investigate tension lap splices of No. 14 and 18 (43 and 57 mm) bars. Additional variables included transverse reinforcement, concrete compressive strength (nominally 5 or 10 ksi (34 or 69 MPa)), and target bar stress at splice failure (60 or 100 ksi (420 or 690 MPa)). Results show that both the ACI 408R-03 and ACI 318-19 [2] bond length equations become less conservative as bar diameter increases, so a bar size factor is proposed for modifying bond length equations to obtain similar conservatism across all diameters. A minimum clear cover of one bar diameter is also recommended for large-bar lap splices. Increasing the limit on ((c_b+K_tr ))⁄d_b in the ACI 318-19 development length equation from 2.5 to 4.0 was shown to produce similar mean ratios of test-to-calculated bar stresses across different amounts of transverse reinforcement. Finally, results suggest that development length should be limited to 50d_b when designing lap splices without transverse reinforcement.

Slag-based zero-cement concrete (ZC) of high strength (60 MPa [8.70 ksi]) was developed as an eco-friendly construction material. In the present study, to investigate the structural behavior of precast columns using ZC, cyclic loading tests were performed for five column specimens with reinforcement details of ordinary moment frames. Longitudinal reinforcement was connected by sleeve splices at the precast column-footing joint. The test parameters included the concrete type (portland cement-based normal concrete [NC] versus ZC), construction method (monolithic versus precast), longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and sleeve size. The test results showed that the structural performance (failure mode, strength, stiffness, energy dissipation, and deformation capacity) of the precast ZC columns was comparable to that of the monolithic NC and precast NC columns, and the tested strengths agreed with the nominal strengths calculated by ACI 318-19. These results indicate that current design codes for cementitious materials and sleeve splice of longitudinal reinforcement are applicable to the design of precast ZC columns.

Two large-scale exterior beam-column connections with beam longitudinal headed bars were tested to evaluate their susceptibility to breakout failures. The specimens were designed following the strength and transverse reinforcement detailing provisions in Chapter 15 of ACI 318-19. The variable investigated was the headed bar embedment length, which was determined based on either Chapter 25 of ACI 318-19 or recent research at The University of Kansas, the latter leading to a 22% shorter embedment length. Both specimens exhibited beam flexural yielding, but the specimen with the shorter bar embedment length experienced significantly more connection damage, followed by a concrete breakout failure. Based on the limited test results, it is recommended that nominal joint shear strength be calculated based on a joint effective depth equal to the headed bar embedment length and a shear stress of 1.0λ√fc'​​ MPa (12λ​​√fc' psi). A method for calculating headed bar group anchorage strength in exterior beam-column connections was proposed, which led to reasonable and conservative strength estimates in the test specimens.