Simulated Chloride Penetration into a Solid Slab Bridge Overlayed with Ordinary Concrete and UHPC

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Simulated Chloride Penetration into a Solid Slab Bridge Overlayed with Ordinary Concrete and UHPC

Author(s): Jun Wang and Yail J. Kim

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 363

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 149-161

Keywords: corrosion; overlay; solid slab bridge; ultra-high performance concrete

DOI: 10.14359/51742112

Date: 7/1/2024

Abstract:
The efficacy of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) overlays holds great promise for mitigating chloride-induced corrosion in reinforced concrete bridges. This research examines the corrosion resistance of a bridge structure through the application of simulation techniques to better understand the effectiveness of ordinary concrete and UHPC overlays. To represent the three-dimensional microstructure of ordinary concrete and UHPC, the Virtual Cement and Concrete Testing Laboratory (VCCTL) program is utilized. Additionally, an agent-based model is developed to investigate chloride penetration mechanisms within the concrete overlays. Furthermore, the structural response of the overlayed bridge under a corrosive condition is studied.

Related References:

1. Sritharan, S., Doiron, G., Bierwagen, D., Keierleber, B., and Abu-Hawash, A. 2018. First application of UHPCbridge deck overlay in North America, Transportation Research Record, 2672(26), 40-47.

2. Krauss, P.D., Lawler, J.S., and Steiner, K.A. 2009. Guidelines for selection of bridge deck overlays, sealers andtreatments, NCHRP Project 20-07, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

3. Wibowo, H. and Sritharan, S. 2018. Use of ultra-high-performance concrete for bridge deck overlays, Report No.IHRB Project TR-683, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

4. Graybeal, B. and Haber. Z. 2018. Ultra-high performance concrete for bridge deck overlays, No. FHWA-HRT-17-097, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

5. Bruhwiler, E. and Denarie, E. 2013. Rehabilitation and strengthening of concrete structures using ultra-highperformance fibre reinforced concrete, Structural Engineering International, 23(4), 450-457.6. Wang, J. and Kim, Y.J., 2023. Evolutionary characteristics of microstructural hydration and chloride diffusion inUHPC, Materials & Design, 225, 11528.

7. Bullard, J.W. 2014. Virtual cement and concrete testing laboratory: version 9.5 user guide, National Institute ofStandards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

8. Wilensky, U. 1999. NetLogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, NorthwesternUniversity, Evanston, IL.

9. AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (9th edition), American Association of StateHighway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.

10. Lantsoght, E.O.L., van der Veen, C., Walraven, J., and de Boer, A. 2013. Recommendations for the shearassessment of reinforced concrete slab bridges from experiments, Structural Engineering International, 23(4), 418-426.

11. Tayeh, B.A., Bakar, B.A., Johari, M.M., and Voo, Y.L. 2012. Mechanical and permeability properties of theinterface between normal concrete substrate and ultra high performance fiber concrete overlay, Construction andBuilding Materials, 36, 538-548.

12. Haber, Z.B., Munoz, J.F., De la Varga, I., and Graybeal, B.A. 2018. Bond characterization of UHPC overlays forconcrete bridge decks: laboratory and field testing, Construction and Building Materials, 190, 1056-1068.

13. Li, L., Xia, J., and Lin, S. 2012. A multi-phase model for predicting the effective diffusion coefficient of chloridesin concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 26, 295-301.

14. Care, S. 2002. Influence of aggregates on chloride diffusion coefficient into mortar, Cement and ConcreteResearch, 33, 1021-1028.

15. Bamforth, P.B., Price, W.F., and Emerson, M. 1997. An international review of chloride ingress into structuralconcrete, Contractor Report 359, Thomas Telford, Edinburgh, UK.

16. Crank, J. 1975. The mathematics of diffusion, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

17. Ugural, A.C. and Fenster, S.K. 1995. Advanced strength and applied elasticity, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River,NJ.

18. Thoft-Christensen, P., Jensen, F.M., Middleton, C.R., and Blackmore, A. 1996. Assessment of the reliability ofconcrete slab bridges, 7th IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conference, Boulder, CO, 1-8.

19. Liu, T. and Weyers, R.W. 1998. Modeling the dynamic corrosion process in chloride contaminated concretestructures, Cement and Concrete Research, 28(3), 365-379.

20. Cao, C. and Cheung, M.M.S. 2014. Non-uniform rust expansion for chloride-induced pitting corrosion in RCstructures, Construction and Building Materials, 51, 75-81.

21. Val, D.M. and Melchers, R.E. 1997. Reliability of deteriorating RC slab bridges, Journal of StructuralEngineering, 123(12), 1638-1644.

22. Wang, J. and Kim, Y.J., 2020. Functional characteristics of ultra-high performance concrete comprising variousfibers. ACI Materials Journal, 117(5), 179-191.

23. Song, H.W., Shim, H.B., Petcherdchoo, A., and Park, S.K. 2009. Service life prediction of repaired concretestructures under chloride environment using finite difference method, Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(2), 120-127.

24. Park, K.J., Ardito, T.H., Ito, A.P., Park, K.J.B., de Oliveira, R.A., and Chiorato, M. 2007. Effective diffusivitydetermination considering shrinkage by means of explicit finite difference method, Drying Technology, 25, 1313-1319.

25. Hooton, R.D., Geiker, M.R., and Bentz, E.C. 2002. Effects of curing on chloride ingress and implications onservice life, ACI Materials Journal, 99, 201-206.