Title:
Clay Calcination Methods and Composition Impacts on Calcined Clay Properties
Author(s):
Anastasia Koutsouradi, Anne J. Damø, Wilson R. Leal da Silva, Mehnaz Dhar and Peter A. Jensen
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
362
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
671-681
Keywords:
clay calcination, DSC, flash calcination, soak calcination, iron impurity, kaolinite content, R3 test
DOI:
10.14359/51741020
Date:
6/14/2024
Abstract:
Calcined clay is a well-established supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in the cement industry. Its high pozzolanic reactivity – upon thermal treatment – and widespread availability offer the potential to reduce the clinker factor substantially. While extensively explored, research has primarily focused on muffle furnace calcination, with limited studies available on understanding the influence of varying calcination methods and scalability. Thus, it is crucial to generate new research data that allow for optimizing different calcination methods. In this study, two clays – with different kaolinite and iron impurity contents – calcined under three laboratory methods, namely a muffle furnace, a rotary kiln, and an entrained flow reactor are investigated. The calcined samples are characterized by TGA/DSC, XRD, and the R3 bound water test to assess: a) dehydroxylation degree, b) recrystallization peak formation, and c) pozzolanic reactivity. In addition, PSD and BET are used to explore structural changes in the calcined samples regarding agglomeration and specific surface area, while touching on deposit formation and color control of flash calcined clays. The results show that both soak and flash calcination techniques can deliver optimal pozzolanic reactivity for both clays. DSC has shown a good correlation by accurately indicating the recrystallization. Agglomeration and specific surface area rates were significantly affected by flash calcination, requiring after grinding. The clay containing higher iron content demonstrated a grey color after flash calcination, while at high temperatures deposit formations were limiting the material’s collection from the entrained flow reactor. Ongoing research of samples with varying iron contents will further evaluate this occurrence.
Related References:
1. Antoni M, Rossen J, Martirena F, Scrivener K. Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cem Concr Res 2012;42:1579–89. doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2012.09.006
2. Snellings R. Assessing, Understanding and Unlocking Supplementary Cementitious Materials. RILEM Technical Letters 2016;1:50–5. doi: 10.21809/RILEMTECHLETT.2016.12
3. Matschei T, Lothenbach B, Glasser FP. The role of calcium carbonate in cement hydration. Cem Concr Res 2007;37:551–8. doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2006.10.013.
4. Ito A, Wagai R. Global distribution of clay-size minerals on land surface for biogeochemical and climatological studies. Scientific Data 2017 4:1 2017;4:1–11. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.103
5. Scrivener K, Martirena F, Bishnoi S, Maity S. Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem Concr Res 2018;114:49–56. doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.08.017
6. Hanein T, Thienel KC, Zunino F, Marsh ATM, Maier M, Wang B, et al. Clay calcination technology: state-of-the-art review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL. Materials and Structures 2023 55:1 2021;55:1–29. doi: 10.1617/S11527-021-01807-6
7. Krishnan S, Emmanuel AC, Shah V, Parashar A, Mishra G, Maity S, et al. Industrial production of limestone calcined clay cement: experience and insights. Https://DoiOrg/101680/Jgrma1800003 2019;7:15–27. doi: 10.1680/JGRMA.18.00003
8. Maity S, Mallik A. Pilot scale manufacture of limestone calcined clay cement : The Indian experience 2014.
9. San Nicolas R, Cyr M, Escadeillas G. Characteristics and applications of flash metakaolins. Appl Clay Sci 2013;83–84:253–62. doi: 10.1016/J.CLAY.2013.08.036
10. Inocente JM, Elyseu F, Jaramillo Nieves LJ, Jiusti J, Cargnin M, Peterson M. Production and characterization of high-reactivity metakaolins calcined in flash reactor. Appl Clay Sci 2021;213:106247. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2021.106247
11. Scrivener K, Avet F, Maraghechi H, Zunino F, Ston J, Hanpongpun W, et al. Impacting factors and properties of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3). Green Mater 2018;7:3–14. doi: 10.1680/JGRMA.18.00029
12. Rasmussen KE, Moesgaard M, Køhler LL, Tran TT, Skibsted J. Comparison of the pozzolanic reactivity for flash and soak calcined clays in portland cement blends. RILEM Bookseries 2015;10:151–7. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9939-3_19
13. Alujas A, Fernández R, Quintana R, Scrivener KL, Martirena F. Pozzolanic reactivity of low grade kaolinitic clays: Influence of calcination temperature and impact of calcination products on OPC hydration. Appl Clay Sci 2015;108:94–101. doi: 10.1016/J.CLAY.2015.01.028
14. Kassa AE, Shibeshi NT, Tizazu BZ. Kinetic analysis of dehydroxylation of Ethiopian kaolinite during calcination. J Therm Anal Calorim 2022;147:12837–53. doi: 10.1007/S10973-022-11452-Y
15. Meinhold RH, Atakul H, Davies TW, Slade RCT. Flash calcination of kaolinite studied by DSC, TG and MAS NMR. Journal of Thermal Analysis 1992;38:2053–65. doi: 10.1007/BF01979617
16. Claverie M, Martin F, Tardy JP, Cyr M, De Parseval P, Grauby O, et al. Structural and chemical changes in kaolinite caused by flash calcination: Formation of spherical particles. Appl Clay Sci 2015;114:247–55. doi: 10.1016/J.CLAY.2015.05.031
17. Muzenda R, Georget F, Matschei T. The effect of iron phases on the performance of calcined clays in calcined clay-limestone cement. The 16th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement 2023, n.d.
18. Martirena F, Almenares R, Zunino F, Alujas A, Scrivener K. Color control in industrial clay calcination. RILEM Technical Letters 2020;5:1–7. doi: 10.21809/RILEMTECHLETT.2020.107
19. Canut M, Miller S, Jolnæs M. Calcined Clay: Process Impact on the Reactivity and Color. RILEM Bookseries 2020;25:163–7. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_19.
20. Kleinhans U, Wieland C, Frandsen FJ, Spliethoff H. Ash formation and deposition in coal and biomass fired combustion systems: Progress and challenges in the field of ash particle sticking and rebound behavior. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2018;68:65–168. doi: 10.1016/J.PECS.2018.02.001
21. Chen YF, Wang MC, Hon MH. Phase transformation and growth of mullite in kaolin ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2004;24:2389–97. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00631-9