Meta-Analysis of PCE Structures as Dispersants in Cementitious Materials

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Meta-Analysis of PCE Structures as Dispersants in Cementitious Materials

Author(s): Thomas Wagner, Tobias Lange, Torben Gädt

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 354

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 61-74

Keywords: cement; dispersant; meta-analysis; polycarboxylate ether; rheology; slump flow; yield stress

DOI: 10.14359/51736062

Date: 7/1/2022

Abstract:
The structure-activity relationship of dispersants in cement was explored by conducting a meta-analysis of academic publications on polycarboxylate ether (PCE). Therefore, structural data of PCE dispersants was collected from the academic literature together with the corresponding mini-slump data. The structures were summarized using the structural parameters P (the number of repeat units of the side chain), n (the number of repeat units in the backbone), and N (the number of monomers per repeat unit). It was found that the distribution of side-chain length is multimodal, reflecting the availability of commercial macromonomers based on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). For the mean values, it was found P = 38.5, N = 4.7, and n = 24.3. The most frequently employed charge-bearing monomers are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and maleic acid. The main macromonomers are either based on methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate, isoprenyl-poly(ethylene glycol) (IPEG), methallyl-PEG, or allyl-PEG. Additionally, rheology data from mini-slump tests containing this PCE was transformed into yield stress data. In an attempt to identify the most dosage-efficient PCE structures, the yield stress data were compared with PCE structural descriptors and dosage. It was found that PCE with a P/N ratio between 6-12 and an adsorption constant between 10-100 show the highest dosage efficiency.

Related References:

1. Aïtcin, P.-C., and Flatt, R. J. “Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures,” Woodhead Publishing, 2015, 668 pp.

2. Roussel, N. “Understanding the Rheology of Concrete,” Elsevier, 2011, 379 pp.

3. Dodson, V. H. “Concrete admixtures,” Springer Science & Business Media, 1990.

4. Ramachandran, V. S. “Concrete admixtures handbook: properties, science and technology,” William Andrew, 1996.

5. Senft, S., Gallegos, S., Manson, D. P., et al. “Chemical admixtures for concrete,” Crc Press, 1999.

6. Tsubakimoto, T., Hosoido, M., Tawara, H., et al. “Cement dispersant.” JPS5874552A, 1983.

7. Malhotra, V. M., Mineral, C. C. for., Technology, E., et al. “Superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete: Proceedings, fifth CANMET/ACI international conference, Rome, Italy, 1997,” ACI International, 1997.

8. Malhotra, V. M., Mineral, C. C. for., Technology, E., et al. “Sixth CANMET/ACI international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete,” American Concrete Institute, 2000.

9. Nkinamubanzi, P. C. “Seventh CANMET/ACI international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete: Berlin, Germany, 2003 : Supplementary papers,” American Concrete Institute, 2003.

10. Malhotra, V. M., Mineral, C. C. for., Technology, E., et al. “8th CANMET/ACI international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete,” American Concrete Institute, 2006.

11. Holland, T. C., Gupta, P. R., Malhotra, V. M., et al. “Ninth ACI international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures,” American Concrete Institute, 2009.

12. Malhotra, V. M. “Tenth international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures,” American Concrete Institute, 2012.

13. Malhotra, V. M., Gupta, P. R., and Holland, T. C. “Eleventh international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 10-13 july 2015,” American Concrete Institute, 2015.

14. Liu, J., Wang, Z., Holland, T. C., et al. “SP-329 twelfth international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete,” American Concrete Institute, 2018.

15. Gay, C., and Raphael, E. “Comb-like polymers inside nanoscale pores,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, V. 94, Nos. 1–3, 2001, pp. 229–36.

16. Flatt, R. J., Schober, I., Raphael, E., et al. “Conformation of Adsorbed Comb Copolymer Dispersants,” Langmuir, V. 25, No. 2, 2009, pp. 845–55.

17. Marchon, D., Juilland, P., Gallucci, E., et al. “Molecular and submolecular scale effects of comb-copolymers on tri-calcium silicate reactivity: Toward molecular design,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 100, No. 3, 2017, pp. 817–41.

18. Flatt, R., Zimmermann, J., Hampel, C., et al. “The role of adsorption energy in the sulfate-polycarboxylate competition,” Special Publication, V. 262, 2009, pp. 153–64.

19. Zimmermann, J., Hampel, C., Kurz, C., et al. “Effect of polymer structure on the sulfate-polycarboxylate competition,” Special Publication, V. 262, 2009, pp. 165–76.

20. Marchon, D., Sulser, U., Eberhardt, A., et al. “Molecular design of comb-shaped polycarboxylate dispersants for environmentally friendly concrete,” Soft Matter, V. 9, No. 45, 2013, pp. 10719–28.

21. Gelardi, G., and Flatt, R. “Working mechanisms of water reducers and superplasticizers.” Science and technology of concrete admixtures. Elsevier, 2016. pp. 257–78.

22. Flatt, R., and Schober, I. “Superplasticizers and the rheology of concrete.” Understanding the rheology of concrete. Elsevier, 2012. pp. 144–208.

23. Plank, J., Sakai, E., Miao, C., et al. “Chemical admixtures—Chemistry, applications and their impact on concrete microstructure and durability,” Cement and concrete research, V. 78, 2015, pp. 81–99.

24. Ferrari, G., Gamba, M., Surico, F., et al. “The Troubled Relationship Between PCEs and Cement in the Presence of Swelling Clays,” Special Publication, V. 329, 2018, pp. 127–42.

25. Sun, Z., Wu, L., Ji, Y., et al. “Study on Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer with Slump Retention Capacity,” Special Publication, V. 329, 2018, pp. 31–40.

26. Rozzoni, A., and Dolci, M. “Definition of a PCE Family that Increases Performances when a Workability Retention Agent (WRA) is Added,” Special Publication, V. 329, 2018, pp. 225–36.

27. Erzengin, S. G., Kaya, K., Perçin Özkorucuklu, S., et al. “The properties of cement systems superplasticized with methacrylic ester-based polycarboxylates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 166, 2018, pp. 96–109.

28. Ezzat, M., Xu, X., El Cheikh, K., et al. “Structure-property relationships for polycarboxylate ether superplasticizers by means of RAFT polymerization,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, V. 553, 2019, pp. 788–97.

29. Guo, W., Sun, N., Yang, T., et al. “Synthesis and Properties of Amphoteric Superplasticizer,” Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 6, 2011, pp. 614–8.

30. Habbaba, A., Lange, A., and Plank, J. “Synthesis and performance of a modified polycarboxylate dispersant for concrete possessing enhanced cement compatibility,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, V. 129, No. 1, 2013, pp. 346–53.

31. He, Y., Zhang, X., Shui, L., et al. “Effects of PCEs with various carboxylic densities and functional groups on the

fluidity and hydration performances of cement paste,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 202, 2019, pp. 656–68.

32. Li, H., Yao, Y., Wang, Z., et al. “Influence of Monomer Ratios on Molecular Weight Properties and Dispersing Effectiveness in Polycarboxylate Superplasticizers,” Materials, V. 13, No. 4, 2020, p. 1022.

33. Lv, S., Duan, J., Gao, R., et al. “Effects of poly(ethylene glycol) branch chain linkage mode on polycarboxylate superplasticizer performance,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, V. 23, 2012, pp. 1596–603.

34. Mantellato, S. “Flow loss in superplasticized cement pastes.” PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich, 2017.

35. Plank, J., Pöllmann, K., Zouaoui, N., et al. “Synthesis and performance of methacrylic ester based polycarboxylate superplasticizers possessing hydroxy terminated poly(ethylene glycol) side chains,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1210–6.

36. Platel, D. “The impact of the polymer architecture on the physico-chemistry properties of cement slurries.” Theses, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 2005.

37. Ran, Q., Song, F., Wang, T., et al. “Effect of the different hydrophobic groups of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on the properties in cement mortars,” Polymer Composites, V. 38, No. 9, 2017, pp. 1783–91.

38. Sachsenhauser, B. K. “Kolloidchemische und thermodynamische Untersuchungen zur Wechselwirkung von α-Allyl-ω-methoxypolyethylenglykol-Maleinsäureanhydrid-Copolymeren mit CaCO3 und Portlandzement.” TU München, 2009.

39. Wang, X., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., et al. “Effect of side chains in block polycarboxylate superplasticizers on earlyage properties of cement paste,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, V. 133, No. 3, 2018, pp. 1439–46.

40. Wang, X., Ran, Q., Yang, Y., et al. “Influence of Sequence Structure of Polycarboxylate Superplasticizers on Early Age Properties of Cement Paste,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, V. 28, No. 10, 2016, p. 04016112.

41. Winnefeld, F., Becker, S., Pakusch, J., et al. “Effects of the molecular architecture of comb-shaped superplasticizers on their performance in cementitious systems,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 29, No. 4, 2007, pp. 251–62.

42. Yu, B., Zeng, Z., Ren, Q., et al. “Study on the performance of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers synthesized

by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization,” Journal of Molecular Structure, V. 1120, 2016, pp. 171–9.

43. Zhang, L., Kong, X., Xing, F., et al. “Working mechanism of post-acting polycarboxylate superplasticizers containing acrylate segments,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, V. 135, No. 5, 2018, p. 45753.

44. Zhang, Q., Shu, X., Yu, X., et al. “Toward the viscosity reducing of cement paste: Optimization of the molecular weight of polycarboxylate superplasticizers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 242, 2020, p. 117984.

45. Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Ren, J., et al. “Polycarboxylate superplasticizers of acrylic acid–isobutylene polyethylene glycol copolymers: monomer reactivity ratios, copolymerization behavior and performance,” Iranian Polymer Journal, V. 25, No. 6, 2016, pp. 549–57.

46. Lange, A. “Studien zur Zementkompatibilität von Polycarboxylat- Fließmitteln sowie zum Einfluss ihres HLBWertes auf das rheologische Verhalten von Mörtel.” 2015.

47. Gelardi, G. “Characterization of comb copolymer superplasticizers by a multi-technique approach.” ETH Zurich, 2017.

48. Roussel, N., Stéfani, C., and Leroy, R. “From mini-cone test to Abrams cone test: measurement of cement-based materials yield stress using slump tests,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 5, 2005, pp. 817–22.

49. Flatt, R. J., and Bowen, P. “Yodel: a yield stress model for suspensions,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 89, No. 4, 2006, pp. 1244–56.

50. Flatt, R. J., and Bowen, P. “Yield stress of multimodal powder suspensions: an extension of the YODEL (Yield Stress mODEL),” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 90, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1038–44.

51. Perrot, A., Lecompte, T., Khelifi, H., et al. “Yield stress and bleeding of fresh cement pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 7, 2012, pp. 937–44.

52. Hot, J., Bessaies-Bey, H., Brumaud, C., et al. “Adsorbing polymers and viscosity of cement pastes,” Cement and concrete research, V. 63, 2014, pp. 12–9.

53. Marchon, D., Boscaro, F., and Flatt, R. J. “First steps to the molecular structure optimization of polycarboxylate ether superplasticizers: Mastering fluidity and retardation,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 115, 2019, pp. 116–23.