Improving Performance and Reducing The CO<sub>2</sub> Footprint of Concrete using Multiple Approaches

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Improving Performance and Reducing The CO2 Footprint of Concrete using Multiple Approaches

Author(s): R.Douglas Hooton

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 349

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 696-710

Keywords: durability

DOI: 10.14359/51732782

Date: 4/22/2021

Abstract:

Approximately 90% of the carbon footprint from concrete production is from portland cement (assuming portland cement is used as the sole cementitious binder). Therefore to reduce its carbon footprint, the amount of Portland cement clinker needs to be reduced. There are different ways of doing this, including optimization of combined aggregate gradations, use of water reducing admixtures, use of portland-limestone cements (PLC), and use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). All of these measures can be taken simultaneously, but there is also concern that extreme measures (such as high SCM replacement levels) will reduce the robustness of concrete to abuse during construction, resulting in lower durability. Durability is important to obtain long service lives of concrete structures, and has a large impact on their carbon footprint.

This paper includes discussion of how each these measures if used prudently, can achieve significant reductions in carbon footprint while simultaneously improving durability in aggressive exposure conditions.

Related References:

1. Baumert, K.A., Herzog, T. and Pershing, J. ‘Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy,’ World Resources Institute Report, (2005), 122 pp.

(http://pdf.wri.org/navigating_numbers.pdf).

2. Sakai, K. and Noguchi, T. ‘The Sustainable Use of Concrete,’ (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013).

3. ‘The Cement Sustainability Initiative, a Sectoral Approach’, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2009.

4. Global Cement and Concrete Association website: https://gccassociation.org/sustainabilityinnovation/gnr-gcca-in-numbers/ (accessed Sept. 25, 2019).

5. Anson-Cartwright, M. and Hooton, R.D., ‘Optimization of Aggregate Gradation Combinations to Improve Concrete Sustainability and Durability,’ Proceedings, 3rd Intl. Structural Specialty Conf., CSCE, Edmonton, June 2012 STR-1059-1 to STR-1059-8.

6. Tikkanen, J, Cwirzen, A. and Penttala, V. ‘Mineral powder concrete –effects of powder content on concrete properties,’ Mag. Conc. Res. 63 (12) (2011) 893-903.

7. Hooton, R.D., Thomas, M.D.A., and Ramlochan, T., ‘Use of Pore Solution Analysis in Design for Concrete Durability,’ Adv. in Cement Res. 22 (4) (2010) 203-210.

8. Hart, J. Ryell, J., and Thomas, M.D.A., Proceedings, PCI/FHWA International Symposium on High Performance Concrete, New Orleans (PCI 1997).

9. Thomas, M.D.A., Cail, K. and Hooton, R.D., “Development and Applications of Silica Fume Concrete in Canada: a Retrospective” Cdn J. of Civil Engng., 25 (3) (1998) 391-400.

10. Mangat, P.S. and Malloy, B.T., ‘Prediction of Long Term Chloride Concentration in Concrete,’ Matls. Structures, 27, (1994) 338-346.

11. Thomas, M.D.A. and Bamforth, P., ‘Modelling Chloride Diffusion in Concrete: Effect of Flyash and Slag,’ Cem. Conc .Res., 29 (1999) 487-496.

12. Nokken, M.R., Boddy, A., Hooton, R.D. and Thomas, M.D.A. ‘Time-Dependent Diffusion in Concrete—Three Laboratory Studies’ Cem. Conc. Res., 36(1) (2006) 200-207.

13. Hooton, R.D. ‘Canadian Use of Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag as a Supplementary Cementing Material for Enhanced Performance of Concrete’, Cdn. J. of Civil Engng. 27 (2000) 754-760.

14. Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., and Maiti, S., ‘Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3)’, Cement and Concrete Research, 114 (2018) 49-56.

15. Ramezanianpour, A.M. and Hooton, R.D. ‘A Study on Hydration, Compressive Strength, and Porosity of Portland-Limestone Cement Mixes Containing SCMs,’ Cem. Conc. Comp., 51 (8)

(2014), 1-13.

16. Ramezanianpour, A.M. and Hooton, R.D., ‘Sulfate Resistance of Portland-Limestone Cements in Combination with Supplementary Cementitious Materials’, Matls. Str., 46 (7) (2013) 1061-1073.

17. Hooton, R.D., Ahani, R.M. and Ramezanianpour, A.M., “Prevention of Thaumasite Sulfate Attack in Binders Containing Interground Limestone,” e-Proceedings, 8th Intl. Symp. on Cement &

Concrete, Nanjing, China (2013) 7pp.

18. Ramezanianpour, A.M. and Hooton, R.D., ‘Thaumasite Sulfate Attack in Portland and Portland-Limestone Cement Mortars Exposed to Sulfate Solution,’ Const. Bldg. Matls., 40 (2013) 162-173.

19. Hooton, R.D., Hover, K.C. and Bickley, J.A., “Performance Standards and Specifications for Concrete for Promotion of Sustainable Construction”, Proceedings, CONSEC’07, Tours, France, (2007) 1 815-830.

20. Hooton, R.D. and Bickley, J.A., “Design for Durability: The Key to Improving Concrete Sustainability,” Constr. Bldg Matls, 67, August 2014, pp. 422-430.

21. Hooton, R.D., and Bickley, J.A., ‘Prescriptive versus Performance approaches for durability design - the end of innocence?’ Matls. Corrosion, 63 (12) (2012) 1097-1101.

22. Hooton, R.D., ‘Future Directions for Design, Specification, Testing, and Construction of Durable Concrete Structures,’ Cem. Conc. Res.: Special Issue, Vol. 124F, Oct. 2019, paper 105827, 17 pp.