Structural Behavior of TL-4 Recycled Tire Chip and Fiber Reinforced Concrete Single Slope Barriers

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Structural Behavior of TL-4 Recycled Tire Chip and Fiber Reinforced Concrete Single Slope Barriers

Author(s): Grace Darling, Stephan A. Durham, and Mi G. Chorzepa

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 347

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 176-190

Keywords: Single Slope Barrier, Rubberized Concrete, Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC), Dynamic Impact, Recycled Tire Chips, Steel Fibers, Concrete Median Barrier (CMB), MASH Testing

DOI: 10.14359/51732664

Date: 3/1/2021

Abstract:

Concrete median barriers (CMB) are installed to decrease the overall severity of traffic accidents by producing higher vehicle decelerations. In 2016, an update to the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) saw a 58% increase in impact severity of test level 4 (TL-4) impact conditions when compared to the NCHRP Report 350 testing criteria. This study investigates the use of fiber-reinforced rubberized CMBs in dissipating the impact energy to improve driver safety involved in crashed vehicles. Two full-scale barrier prototypes with shear keys were constructed and tested under impact conditions in a laboratory setting. Compared to the Georgia Department of Transportation specified single-slope barrier, the fiber-reinforced rubberized concrete mixture, a design with 20% replacement of the coarse aggregate by volume with recycled rubber tire chips and a 1.0% steel fiber addition, was evaluated based on its performance in toughness, energy absorption capacity, and its recoverable deformation. It is concluded that the TC20ST1 barrier performed as well as the control barrier at the impact load of 150.0 kips (667.2 kN), with neither barrier experiencing any visible damage.

Related References:

AASHTO, (2016). “Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, MASH-2.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, D.C.

Ahmed, MD T., (2018) “Crashworthiness Simulations of Engineered Cementitious Composite Barrier for Impact Loading.” M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia. Athens, GA. pp. 197.

ASTM Standard D6270, 2008 (2012), "Practice for Use of Scrap Tires in Civil Engineering Applications," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, DOI: 10.1520/D6270-08R12, www.astm.org.

Atahan, A. O. and U. K. Sevim (2008). "Testing and Comparison of Concrete Barriers Containing Shredded Waste Tire Chips." Materials Letters. Volume 62, pp. 3754-3757.

Beason, W.L., H.E., Ross, H.S., Perera, W.L., Campise, and D.L., Bullard. (1989). “Development of a Single -Slope Concrete Median Barrier.” Report No. 9429CDK-1. State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. pp. 98.

Bligh, R.P., J-L., Briaud, K.M., Kim, and A., Abu-Odeh. (2010). “Design of Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on MSE Retaining Walls.” Transportation Research Board: NCHRP Report. Volume 663, pp. 195.

Darling, G. (2019). “Structural Behavior of TL-4 Recycled Tire Chip and Fiber Reinforced Concrete Single Slope Barriers.” M.S. Thesis. The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

Elchalakani, M. (2015). "High strength rubberized concrete containing silica fume for the construction of sustainable road side barriers." Structures. Volume 1, pp. 20-38.

El-Salakawy, E., F. Brière., R. Masmoudi., B. Tighiouart., and B. Benmokrane. (2001). “Impact Test on Concrete Bridge Barriers Reinforced wuth GHRP Composite Bars.” Final Report No. 1220-00-BD03. Ministry of Transportation of Quebec Structural Department. Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. pp. 93.

El-Salakawy, E. and M. R. Islam (2014). "Repair of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Barriers." Journal of Bridge Engineering. Volume 19, Issue 6, pp. 11.

Fossier, P. (2016) “Mash Criteria, Crash Testing, Guardrail and Bridge Rail Design.” Louisiana Department of Transportation. Louisiana Transportation Conference, Baton Rouge, LA. pp. 34.

Lopez, V. (2018) “Impact Performance of Recycled Tire Chip and Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites.” M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia. Athens, GA. pp. 160.

Namy, M. (2012) “Structural Behaviour of Cast-In-Place and Precast Concrete Barriers Anchored to Bridge Deck Overhangs and Subjected to Transverse Static Loading.” University of Montreal Research Report.

Namy, M., J-P., Charron and B., Massicotte. (2015). "Structural Behavior of Bridge Decks with Cast-in-Place and Precast Concrete Barriers: Numerical Modeling." Journal of Bridge Engineering. Volume 20, Issue 12, pp. 11.

Sheikh, N.M., R.P., Bligh, and J.M., Holt. (2012). “Minimum Rail Height and Design Impact Load for MASH TL-4 Longitudinal Barriers.” TRB Annual Meeting. pp. 16

Stallings, K., S.A., Durham, and M.G., Chorzepa. (2018) “Effect of Cement and Recycled Rubber Particle Size on the Performance of Rubber-Modified Concrete.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 1-12. doi:10.1080/19397038.2018.1505971

Zou, Y., A. P. Tarko, E. Chen and M. A. Romero (2014). "Effectiveness of Cable Barriers, Guardrails, and Concrete Barrier Walls in Reducing the Risk of Injury." Accid Anal Prev. 72: pp. 55-65.