Title:
Implementation of Closed GFRP Stirrups in FRP-RC Design of Traffic Barriers
Author(s):
Paolo Rocchetti, Guillermo Claure, Francisco De Caso, and Antonio Nanni
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
327
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
14.1-14.16
Keywords:
AASHTO, continuous closed stirrups, GFRP, reinforced concrete, traffic barrier
DOI:
10.14359/51713335
Date:
11/1/2018
Abstract:
The aim of this project is to develop the necessary design knowledge to implement GFRP reinforcement in concrete traffic barriers. Innovation lies in the use of GFRP closed continuous stirrups that became recently available. The design method relies on AASHTO-LRFD Bridge Design Specification and the latest development in specifications issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for Reinforced Concrete (RC) Traffic Barriers. After a review of design procedures for traffic barriers and understanding the mechanical characteristics of GFRP reinforcement, a modified design approach is proposed to reduce GFRP reinforcement amounts and complexity in construction. Supported on experience gained from designing FDOT 32” F–Shape (F32) GFRP RC used in the Halls River Bridge Replacement Project, this study also addressed the 36”–Single Slope (SS36) traffic barrier to be adopted by FDOT in coming years.
Related References:
1. El-Salakawy, B.B., Radhouane Masmoudi, Frédéric Brière, and Éric Breaumier, Concrete Bridge Barriers Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Bars. 2003.
2. Benmokrane, B., E. El-Salakawy, S. El-Gamal, and S. Goulet, Construction and Testing of Canada’s First Concrete Bridge Deck Totally Reinforced With Glass FRP Bars: Val-Alain Bridge on Highway 20 East. J. Bridge Eng., 12(5), 632–64.
3. Code, C.H.B.D., Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, in CAN/CSA-S6-06 2006, CSA.
4. Claure, G., P. Rocchetti, M. Siddiqui, S. Nolan, and A. Nanni, GFRP Innovative Shapes - Halls River Bridge Replacement Project, in CAMX. 2017: Orlando (FL).
5. Grzebieta, R.H., R. Zou, and T. Jiang, Roadside hazard and barrier crashworthiness issues confronting vehicle and barrier manufactures and government regulators.
6. Millar, W.W., A.R. Chamberlain, and Thomas B. Deen, NCHRP Report 350, Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Transportation Research Board National Research Council, 1992.
7. Ross, H.E., D.L. Sicking, R.A. Zimmer, and J.D. Michie, Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, N.R. 350, Editor. 1993.
8. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Seventh edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2014: Washington.
9. Hirsch, T.J., Analytical Evaluation Of Texas Bridge Rails To Contain Buses And Trucks, in College Station, T.T. Institute, Editor.
10. Matta, F. and A. Nanni, Connection of Concrete Railing Post and Bridge Deck with Internal FRP Reinforcement. 2009.
11. Fernando, J.S., A Generalized Strip Method of Reinforced Concrete Slab Design, in Department of civil and municipal engineering. 1977, University College London: London.
12. El-Salakawy, B. F., and M. R., Impact test on concrete bridge barriers reinforced with GFRP composite bars. August 2001.
13. Khatibmasjedi, S., F. De Caso y Basalo, and A. Nanni, SEACON: Redefining Sustainable Concrete, in Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. Las Vegas, USA.