Title:
Sustainable Ready Mixed Concrete Production Using Waste CO2: A Case Study
Author(s):
Sean Monkman
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
330
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
163-174
Keywords:
concrete; carbon dioxide utilization; carbon footprint; environmental analysis; sustainability
DOI:
10.14359/51711248
Date:
9/26/2018
Abstract:
Meeting the cement and concrete industry sustainability goals requires approaches that simultaneously reduce associated carbon emissions and satisfy the increasing demand for concrete. The beneficial use of carbon dioxide in ready mixed concrete production has been developed and installed as a retrofit technology with industrial users. Extended operation has investigated the environmental benefit. An optimum dose of CO2 is added to ready mixed concrete during mixing and batching; increased compressive strength prompts a producer to optimize their mix designs. The use of carbon dioxide along with a lower cement usage reduces the carbon footprint of concrete. One year of production saw an industrial user employ 9.4 tons (8.5 tonnes) of CO2, and realize a savings of more than 449 tons (408 tonnes) of cement. Including the process emissions required to implement the technology, there was a net 488 tons (443 tonnes) of CO2 emissions avoided.
Related References:
1. Le Quéré, C.; Andrew, R. M.; Canadell, J. G.; Sitch, S.; Korsbakken, J. I.; Peters, G. P.; Manning, A. C.; Boden, T. A.; Tans, P. P.; Houghton, R. A.; Keeling, R. F.; Alin, S.; Andrews, O. D.; Anthoni, P.; Barbero, L.; Bopp, L.; Chevallier, F.; Chini, L. P.; Ciais, P.; Currie, K.; Delire, C.; Doney, S. C.; Friedlingstein, P.; Gkritzalis, T.; Harris, I.; Hauck, J.; Haverd, V.; Hoppema, M.; Klein Goldewijk, K.; Jain, A. K.; Kato, E.; Körtzinger, A.; Landschützer, P.; Lefèvre, N.; Lenton, A.; Lienert, S.; Lombardozzi, D.; Melton, J. R.; Metzl, N.; Millero, F.; Monteiro, P. M. S.; Munro, D. R.; Nabel, J. E. M. S.; Nakaoka, S.; O’Brien, K.; Olsen, A.; Omar, A. M.; Ono, T.; Pierrot, D.; Poulter, B.; Rödenbeck, C.; Salisbury, J.; Schuster, U.; Schwinger, J.; Séférian, R.; Skjelvan, I.; Stocker, B. D.; Sutton, A. J.; Takahashi, T.; Tian, H.; Tilbrook, B.; van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T.; van der Werf, G. R.; Viovy, N.; Walker, A. P.; Wiltshire, A. J.; and Zaehle, S., “Global Carbon Budget 2016,” Earth System Science Data, V. 8, No. 2, 2016, pp. 605-649. doi: 10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
2. Portland Cement Association, Portland Cement Environmental Product Declaration www.cement.org/epd (accessed Apr 13, 2017).
3. RMC Research and Education Foundation., Sustainable Concrete Plant Guidelines - Version 1.1 https://www.nrmca.org/sustainability/Certification/SCP%20Guidelines%20Version%201.1.pdf (accessed Nov 23, 2016).
4. International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI)., “Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry,” 2018, p 66.
5. Ashraf, W., “Carbonation of cement-based materials: Challenges and opportunities,” Construction & Building Materials, V. 120, 2016, pp. 558-570. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080
6. Berger, R. L., Young, J. F., and Leung, K., “Acceleration of Hydration of Calcium Silicates by Carbon-Dioxide Treatment,” Nature: Physical Science, V. 240, No. Dec 8, 1972, pp. 16–18.
7. Goodbrake, C. J.; Young, J. F.; and Berger, R. L., “Reaction of Beta-Dicalcium Silicate and Tricalcium Silicate with Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 62, No. 3–4, 1979, pp. 168-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19046.x
8. Young, J. F.; Berger, R. L.; and Breese, J., “Accelerated Curing of Compacted Calcium Silicate Mortars on Exposure to CO2,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 57, No. 9, 1974, pp. 394-397. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11420.x
9. Monkman, S., Kenward, P. A., Dipple, G., MacDonald, M., and Raudsepp, M., “Activation of cement hydration with carbon dioxide,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2018, pp. 1–22.
10. Monkman, S., and MacDonald, M., “On carbon dioxide utilization as a means to improve the sustainability of ready-mixed concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 167, 2017, pp. 365-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.194
11. Monkman, S.; MacDonald, M.; Hooton, R. D.; and Sandberg, P., “Properties and durability of concrete produced using CO2 as an accelerating admixture,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 74, 2016, pp. 218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.10.007
12. National Ready Mixed Concrete Association., “2017 Fleet Benchmarking and Costs Survey,” Concrete inFocus, V. 16, No. 4, 2017, pp. 18–25.
13. “Industrial gases processing,” Häring, H.-W., Ed., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2008, 296 pp.
14. US Environmental Protection Agency, eGRID 2016 https://www.epa.gov/energy/emissions-generation-resource-integrated-database-egrid (accessed May 20, 2018).
15. EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership., “Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories,” 2015.
16. Randall, P.; Meyer, D.; Ingwersen, W.; Vineyard, D.; Bergmann, M.; Unger, S.; and Gonzalez, M., “Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Data-Treatment Chemicals, Construction Materials, Transportation, On-site Equipment, and Other Processes for Use in Spreadsheets for Environmental Footprint Analysis (SEFA),” EPA/600/R-16/176, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 2016.