Title:
Defects Visualization Using Acoustic Emission Tomography Technique
Author(s):
Yan Cheng, Paul C. Hagan, Rudrajit Mitra, and Shuren Wang
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
112
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
755-766
Keywords:
acoustic emission; crack; nondestructive technique; tomography
DOI:
10.14359/51687769
Date:
11/1/2015
Abstract:
In this study, some experiments were conducted for different types of defects embedded in grout specimens. Based on the comparison between the actual condition of the defects and tomograms, the feasibility of acoustic emission tomography for defects visualization was investigated. Influences of inclusions, crack size and inclination, and infills were also studied. Experimental results indicated the location, geometry, and inclination of inclusions and cracks. It is concluded that a series of factors influence wave propagation and the accuracy of tomograms, and assessing tomography resolution and target defects before carrying out a test is likely to improve the effectiveness of tomography.
Related References:
1. Shiotani, T.; Momoki, S.; Chai, H.; and Aggelis, D. G., “Elastic Wave Validation of Large Concrete Structures Repaired by Means of Cement Grouting,” Construction & Building Materials, V. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2647-2652. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.01.005
2. Martin, J.; Broughton, K. J.; Giannopolous, A.; Hardy, M. S. A.; and Forde, M. C., “Ultrasonic Tomography of Grouted Duct Post-Tensioned Reinforced Concrete Bridge Beams,” NDT & E International, V. 34, No. 2, 2001, pp. 107-113. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00035-9
3. Kepler, W. F.; Bond, L. J.; and Frangopol, D. M., “Improved Assessment of Mass Concrete Dams Using Acoustic Travel Time Tomography. Part II—Application,” Construction & Building Materials, V. 14, No. 3, 2000, pp. 147-156. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00013-1
4. Cheng, Y.; Mitra, R.; and Hagan, P., “Development and Future Aspect of Acoustic Emission Data Processing Methods,” 30th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing & 7th International Conference on Acoustic Emission, Granada, Spain, 2012.
5. Schubert, F., “Tomography Techniques for Acoustic Emission Monitoring,” 9th European Conference on NDT, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
6. Schubert, F., “Basic Principles of Acoustic Emission Tomography,” Journal of Acoustic Emission, V. 22, 2004, pp. 147-158.
7. Dong, L.-J., and Li, X.-B., “Three-Dimensional Analytical Solution of Acoustic Emission or Microseismic Source Location under Cube Monitoring Network,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, V. 22, No. 12, 2012, pp. 3087-3094. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61575-6
8. Koulakov, I., “LOTOS Code for Local Earthquake Tomographic Inversion: Benchmarks for Testing Tomographic Algorithms,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, V. 99, No. 1, 2009, pp. 194-214. doi: 10.1785/0120080013
9. Jiang, Y.; Xu, F.; Xu, B.; Jia, M.; Hu, J.; and Gallego, A., “Simulation and Experimental Investigation on the AE Tomography to Improve AE Source Location in the Concrete Structure,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, V. 2014, Article ID 512406, 2014, 10 pp. doi:10.1155/2014/51240610.1155/2014/512406
10. Aggelis, D. G., “Wave Propagation through Engineering Materials; Assessment and Monitoring of Structures through Non-Destructive Techniques,” Materials and Structures, V. 46, No. 4, 2013, pp. 519-532. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0020-x
11. Ge, M., “Analysis of Source Location Algorithms Part II: Iterative Methods,” Journal of Acoustic Emission, V. 21, 2003, pp. 29-51.
12. Falls, S. D.; Young, R. P.; Carlson, S. R.; and Chow, T., “Ultrasonic Tomography and Acoustic Emission in Hydraulically Fractured Lac du Bonnet Grey Granite,” Journal of Geophysical Research, V. 97, 1992, pp. 6867-6884. doi: 10.1029/92JB00041
13. Prugger, A. F., and Gendzwill, D. J., “Microearthquake Location: A Nonlinear Approach That Makes Use of a Simplex Stepping Procedure,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, V. 78, No. 2, 1988, pp. 799-815.
14. Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R., “A Simplex Method for Function Minimization,” The Computer Journal, V. 7, No. 4, 1965, pp. 308-313. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
15. Hansen, P. C., and Saxild-Hansen, M., “AIR Tools—A MATLAB Package of Algebraic Iterative Reconstruction Methods,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, V. 236, No. 8, 2012, pp. 2167-2178. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.09.039
16. Cheng, Y.; Hagan, P.; and Mitra, R., “Application of Acoustic Emission Tomography Technique in Concrete,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, V. 405-408, 2013, pp. 1115-1120. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.1115
17. Martin, J.; Hardy, M. S. A.; Usmani, A. S.; and Forde, M. C., “Accuracy of NDE in Bridge Assessment,” Engineering Structures, V. 20, No. 11, 1998, pp. 979-984. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00192-2
18. Aggelis, D. G.; Tsimpris, N.; Chai, H. K.; Shiotani, T.; and Kobayashi, Y., “Numerical Simulation of Elastic Waves for Visualization of Defects,” Construction & Building Materials, V. 25, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1503-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.008
19. Saito, T., “Variation of Physical Properties of Igneous Rocks in Weathering,” ISRM International Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, 1981, 6 pp.
20. Barton, N., “Environmental Effects on Velocity,” Rock Quality, Seismic Velocity, Attenuation and Anisotropy, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2006, pp. 19-34.