Title:
Use of High SO3 Coal Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete
Author(s):
Gopakumar Kaladharan, Moe (Mohammadreza) Sharbaf, Farshad Rajabipour
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
362
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
682-700
Keywords:
flue gas desulfurization, low carbon concrete, off-specification fly ash, setting time, calcium sulfite
DOI:
10.14359/51742002
Date:
6/17/2024
Abstract:
A large volume of freshly produced and harvested coal ash (from landfills and ponds) contains SO3 content above 5.0%. This exceeds the allowable limit in major SCM specifications (e.g., in ASTM C618), and disallows the use of such coal ashes in concrete. This presentation explores the properties and performance of these coal ashes as SCM. It is shown that SO3 may be present in ash in the form of CaSO3, CaSO4, or Na2SO4 (including solid solutions of alkali sulfates and carbonates), and that the form of SO3 has a large impact on the performance of coal ash in concrete. For example, while ashes containing CaSO3 may cause extensive set retardation, those containing CaSO4 may increase the risk of internal sulfate attack and deleterious expansion. In this work, the mechanisms responsible for each behavior are explored, the allowable SO3 limits are better defined, and strategies for beneficiation of coal ashes that exceed such limits are introduced. The outcome is facilitating the safe and efficient use of large volumes of currently off-spec coal ash to produce durable and low-CO2 concrete.
Related References:
1. Global Cement and Concrete Association, “Concrete Future: The GCCA 2050 Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap for Net Zero Concrete,” Global Cement and Concrete Association, London, 2021. Online.. Available: https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/
2. T. Hemalatha and A. Ramaswamy, “A review on fly ash characteristics – Towards promoting high volume utilization in developing sustainable concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 147, pp. 546–559, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.114
3. Ashley Hatfield, “Mineral Industry Surveys,” USGS National Minerals Information Center, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 28, 2023. Online.. Available: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/cement-statistics-and-information
4. G. Kaladharan and F. Rajabipour, “Evaluation and beneficiation of high sulfur and high alkali fly ashes for use as supplementary cementitious materials in concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 339, p. 127672, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127672
5. Y. Wang, L. Burris, R. D. Hooton, C. R. Shearer, and P. Suraneni, “Effects of unconventional fly ashes on cementitious paste properties,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 125, p. 104291, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104291
6. J. Yoon, K. Jafari, R. Tokpatayeva, S. Peethamparan, J. Olek, and F. Rajabipour, “Characterization and quantification of the pozzolanic reactivity of natural and non-conventional pozzolans,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 133, p. 104708, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104708
7. M. Zahedi and F. Rajabipour, “Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC) Fly Ash and Its Performance in Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 116, no. 4, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.14359/51716720
8. ASTM C618, “Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete,” ASTM International, ASTM C618-23, 2023. doi: 10.1520/C0618-23
9. B. G. Miller, Clean Coal Engineering Technology. Elsevier, 2010.
10. ACI PRC 232.5, “Harvested Fly Ash as a Supplementary Cementitious Material-TechNote,” ACI PRC 232.5, 2021.
11. G. Kaladharan, R. M. Ghantous, and F. Rajabipour, “Early age hydration behavior of portland cement-based binders incorporating fly ash contaminated with flue gas desulfurization products,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 139, p. 105062, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105062
12. B. G. Miller, Clean Coal Engineering Technology, 1st edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010.
13. A. Lagosz and J. Malolepszy, “Tricalcium aluminate hydration in the presence of calcium sulfite hemihydrate,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 333–339, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00957-2
14. A. Ren, B. Guo, Y. Ma, Z. Zhu, and T. Zhu, “Effects of Calcium Sulfite on Retarding of Cement,” in 2009 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Jun. 2009, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162731
15. H. Motzet and H. Poellmann, “Synthesis and characterization of sulfite-containing AFm phases in the system CaO-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}-SO{sub 2}-H{sub 2}O,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 7, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00082-4
16. A. Lagosz, J. Malolepszy, and S. Garrault, “Hydration of tricalcium aluminate in the presence of various amounts of calcium sulphite hemihydrate: Conductivity tests,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1016–1022, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.006
17. F. Zunino, D. P. Bentz, and J. Castro, “Reducing setting time of blended cement paste containing high-SO3 fly ash (HSFA) using chemical/physical accelerators and by fly ash pre-washing,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 90, pp. 14–26, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.018
18. I. Navarrete, F. Vargas, P. Martinez, A. Paul, and M. Lopez, “Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) fly ash as a sustainable, safe alternative for cement-based materials,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 283, p. 124646, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124646
19. N. P. Sharifi et al., “The utilization of sulfite-rich Spray Dryer Absorber Material in portland cement concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 213, pp. 306–312, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.074
20. T. H. Adams, “Coal Ash Recycling Rate Increases Slightly in 2021; Use of Harvested Ash Grows Significantly,” 2022. Online.. Available: https://acaa-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/News-Release-Coal-Ash-Production-and-Use-2021.pdf
21. M. Zahedi, K. Jafari, and F. Rajabipour, “Properties and durability of concrete containing fluidized bed combustion (FBC) fly ash,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 258, p. 119663, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119663
22. K. Mehta and M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, 2014. Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. Online.. Available: https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071797870
23. Y. Dhandapani, M. Santhanam, G. Kaladharan, and S. Ramanathan, “Towards ternary binders involving limestone additions — A review,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 143, p. 106396, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106396
24. M. D. Niemuth, L. Barcelo, and J. Weiss, “Effect of Fly Ash on Optimum Sulfate Levels Measured Using Heat and Strength at Early Ages,” Adv. Civ. Eng. Matls., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 20120012, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1520/ACEM20120012
25. G. Kaladharan, T. Szeles, S. M. Stoffels, and F. Rajabipour, “Novel admixtures for mitigation of alkali-silica reaction in concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 120, p. 104028, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104028
26. ASTM C150, “Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, ASTM C150/C150M-22, 2022. doi: 10.1520/C0150_C0150M-22
27. ASTM C311, “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete,” ASTM C311/C311M-22, 2022. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2023. Online.. Available: https://www.astm.org/c0311_c0311m-22.html
28. ASTM C1897, “Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Reactivity of Supplementary Cementitious Materials by Isothermal Calorimetry and Bound Water Measurements,” ASTM International, ASTM C1897-20, 2020. doi: 10.1520/C1897-20
29. D. Londono-Zuluaga et al., “Report of RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 3: validation of the R3 reactivity test across a wide range of materials,” Mater Struct, vol. 55, no. 5, p. 142, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1617/s11527-022-01947-3
30. N. Hosseinzadeh, K. Kosar, S. Ramanthan, and P. Suraneni, “Operator-Induced Variability Caused by Hand Mixing of Cement Paste—Effects on Fresh and Hardened Properties,” Adv. Civ. Eng. Matls., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 435–450, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1520/ACEM20190029
31. ASTM C1702, “Test Method for Measurement of Heat of Hydration of Hydraulic Cementitious Materials Using Isothermal Conduction Calorimetry,” ASTM International, ASTM C1702-23, 2023. doi: 10.1520/C1702-23
32. ASTM C191, “Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle,” ASTM International, ASTM C191-21, 2021. doi: 10.1520/C0191-21.
33. ASTM C187, “Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste,” ASTM International, ASTM C187-23, 2023. doi: 10.1520/C0187-23.
34. ASTM C670, “Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for Construction Materials,” ASTM International, ASTM C670-15, 2015. doi: 10.1520/C0670-15.
35. ASTM C305, “Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency,” ASTM International, ASTM C305-20, 2020. doi: 10.1520/C0305-20.
36. ASTM C114, “Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement,” ASTM International, ASTM C114-22, 2022. doi: 10.1520/C0114-22
37. ASTM C33, “Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, ASTM C33/C33M-23, 2023. doi: 10.1520/C0033_C0033M-23
38. ASTM C1038, “Test Method for Expansion of Hydraulic Cement Mortar Bars Stored in Water,” ASTM International, ASTM C1038/C1038M-19, 2019. doi: 10.1520/C1038_C1038M-19
39. ASTM C595, “Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements,” ASTM International, ASTM C595-08a, 2008. doi: 10.1520/C0595-08A
40. F. Lagier and K. E. Kurtis, “Influence of Portland cement composition on early age reactions with metakaolin,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1411–1417, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.07.002.
41. Y. Fu, P. Gu, P. Xie, and J. J. Beaudoin, “A kinetic study of delayed ettringite formation in hydrated portland cement paste,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 63–70, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)00113-D
42. E. M. J. Bérodier, A. C. A. Muller, and K. L. Scrivener, “Effect of sulfate on C-S-H at early age,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 138, p. 106248, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106248
43. M. Kasaniya and M. D. A. Thomas, “Investigating Supplementary Cementing Materials for Alkalis and Pore Fluid Properties,” in Proceedings of the 75th RILEM Annual Week 2021, J. I. Escalante-Garcia, P. Castro Borges, and A. Duran-Herrera, Eds., in RILEM Bookseries. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 13–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-21735-7_2
44. M. R. Masson, H. D. Lutz, and B. Engelen, Sulfites, Selenites & Tellurites. Elsevier, 2013.
45. D. Ménétrier, I. Jawed, and J. Skalny, “Effect of gypsum on C3S hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 697–701, Sep. 1980, doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(80)90033-2