In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
ACI World Headquarters
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
ACI Middle East Regional Office
Sheik Rashid Tower, 7th Floor
Dubai World Trade Center
Phone: +971 4 3097066
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Comparison of Methods to Measure Adsorptive Capacity of Coal Fly Ash
Author(s): G. C. Anzalone, Ivan Diaz-Loya, Rafic Y. Minkara, and Lawrence L. Sutter
Publication: Materials Journal
Appears on pages(s): 107-112
Keywords: adsorption; air-entraining admixture; air entrainment; fly ash
Abstract:Although there are many benefits associated with the use of coal fly ash in portland cement concrete, a common issue is the adsorption of air-entraining admixtures by residual carbon, which adversely affects the process of air entrainment. Currently, loss on ignition (LOI) is employed to estimate the total amount of carbon present. The LOI test does not measure the adsorption properties of the carbon, which is the important characteristic. The carbon present in fly ash may or may not be activated and the degree of activation can vary. Therefore, two ashes with the same LOI can have very different adsorption capacities. This paper presents a comparison of methods that have been developed to measure the adsorption capacity of a coal fly ash. These include the iodine number, direct adsorption isotherm, and a fluorescence-based method (FBM). The results of these methods are compared and the relative merits of each methodology are discussed.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber