Title:
Portland-Limestone Cement Concrete Incorporated with Clay Pozzolana
Author(s):
Mark Bediako and Timothy Kofi Ametefe
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
123
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
75-84
Keywords:
carbon-chloride penetration index; carbon-strength index; clay pozzolana; environmental impact assessment; portland-limestone cement; thermodynamic modeling
DOI:
10.14359/51749251
Date:
1/1/2026
Abstract:
Portland-limestone cement (PLC) currently has gained widespread use as the most accessible and sustainable blended cement in the market. However, in many African countries, including Ghana, the use of clay pozzolana (CP) in the concrete industry has primarily relied on ordinary portland cement (OPC). In this study, PLC Type II/B-L was partially replaced with CP at levels ranging from 10 to 50% by weight. The investigation included compressive strength testing, nondestructive evaluations using electrical surface resistivity, pulse velocity, and chloride penetration tests, targeting a characteristic strength of 30 MPa (4351.13 psi). Additionally, an environmental impact assessment based on the carbon footprint of both control and CP concretes was conducted. The mixture design followed the EN 206 standard. A total of 72 cubic molds were produced for the strength test. The results showed that CP concretes with between 10 and 20% replacement achieved strength values of 35 and 33 MPa (5076.4 and 4786.32 psi), respectively, higher than the target of 30 MPa (4351.13 psi) strength at 28 days. However, mixtures with 30 to 50% replacement required extended curing periods of 60 to 90 days to reach the desired strength. At extended curing, 10 to 50% CP replacement attained strength between 32 and 41 MPa (4641.28 and 5946.64 psi). Nondestructive test results showed no direct correlation with compressive strength, confirming that different factors govern strength, resistivity, and pulse velocity. The environmental impact assessment revealed a 14 to 51% reduction in carbon strength index (CSi) and a 19 to 36% increase in carbon durability index (CRi) with 10 to 50% CP (for CSi) and 10 to 40% (for CRi). The thermodynamic modeling also revealed that pozzolana contents below 30% primarily promoted pozzolanic reactions, enhancing performance compared to the control mixture. Based on these results, 20 to 30% CP replacement is recommended to ensure reliable performance, while higher levels (>30%) require further durability evaluation for long-term use.
Related References:
1. Diab, A. M.; Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M.; and Aly, A. A., “Long-Term Study of Mechanical Properties, Durability and Environmental Impact of Limestone Cement Concrete,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, V. 55, No. 2, 2016, pp. 1465-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.01.031
2. Livesey, P., “Strength Characteristics of Portland-Limestone Cements,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 5, No. 3, 1991, pp. 147-150. doi: 10.1016/0950-0618(91)90065-S
3. EN 197-1:2011, “Cement: Part 1: Composition, Specifications, and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
4. ASTM C595/C595M-23, “Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, 9 pp.
5. Zunino, F., and Scrivener, K., “Insights on the Role of Alumina Content and the Filler Effect on the Sulfate Requirement of PC and Blended Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 160, 2022, p. 106929. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107071
6. Elgalhud, A. A.; Dhir, R. K.; and Ghataora, G., “Limestone Addition Effects on Concrete Porosity,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 72, 2016, pp. 222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.006
7. Schmidt, M., “Cement with Interground Additives- Capabilities and Environmental Relief, Part 1,” Zemente Kalk-Gips, V. 45, No. 2, 1992, pp. 64-69.
8. Zunino, F.; Dhandapani, Y.; Ben Haha, M.; Skibsted, J.; Joseph, S.; Krishnan, S.; Parashar, A.; Juenger, M. C. G.; Hanein, T.; Bernal, S. A.; Scrivener, K. L.; and Avet, F., “Hydration and Mixture Design of Calcined Clay Blended Cements: Review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL,” Materials and Structures, V. 55, No. 9, 2022, p. 234. doi: 10.1617/s11527-022-02060-1
9. Kanavaris, F.; Vieira, M.; Bishnoi, S.; Zhao, Z.; Wilson, W.; Tagnit Hamou, A.; Avet, F.; Castel, A.; Zunino, F.; Visalakshi, T.; Martirena, F.; Bernal, S. A.; Juenger, M. C. G.; and Riding, K., “Standardisation of Low Clinker Cements Containing Calcined Clay and Limestone: A Review by RILEM TC-282 CCL,” Materials and Structures, V. 56, No. 9, 2023, p. 169. doi: 10.1617/s11527-023-02257-y
10. Shi, C.; Qu, B.; and Provis, J. L., “Recent Progress in Low-Carbon Binders,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 122, 2019, pp. 227-250. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.009
11. Juenger, M. C. G.; Snellings, R.; and Bernal, S. A., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials: New Sources, Characterization, and Performance Insights,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 122, 2019, pp. 257-273. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008
12. Githachuri, K., and Alexander, M. G., “Durability Performance Potential and Strength of Blended Portland Limestone Cement Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 39, 2013, pp. 115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.027
13. Lewis, R.; Sear, L.; Wainwright, P.; and Ryle, R., “Cementitious Additions,” Advanced Concrete Technology – Constituent Materials, J. Newman and B. S. Choo, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2003, pp. 3-66.
14. Tsivilis, S.; Tsantilas, J.; Kakali, G.; Chaniotakis, E.; and Sakellariou, A., “The Permeability of Portland Limestone Cement Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1465-1471. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00092-9
15. Menéndez, G.; Bonavetti, V.; and Irassar, E. F., “Strength Development of Ternary Blended Cement with Limestone Filler and Blast-Furnace Slag,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 25, No. 1, 2003, pp. 61-67. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00056-7
16. Hawkins, P.; Tennis, P.; and Detwiler, R., “The Use of Limestone in Portland Cement: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Report EB227, American Cement Association, Washington, DC, 2003.
17. Bonavetti, V.; Donza, H.; Menendez, G.; Cabrera, O.; and Irassar, E. F., “Limestone Filler Cement in Low W/C Concrete: A Rational Use of Energy,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 6, 2003, pp. 865-871. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01087-6
18. Dhir, R. K.; Limbachiya, E. M.; McCarthy, M. J.; and Chaipanich, E. A., “Evaluation of Portland Limestone Cements for Use in Concrete Construction,” Materials and Structures, V. 40, No. 5, 2007, pp. 459-473. doi: 10.1617/s11527-006-9143-7
19. Ramezanianpour, A. A.; Ghiasvand, E.; Nickseresht, I.; Mahdikhani, M.; and Moodi, F., “Influence of Various Amounts of Limestone Powder on the Performance of Portland Limestone Cement Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 31, No. 10, 2009, pp. 715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.08.003
20. Thomas, M. D. A., and Hooton, R. D., “The Durability of Concrete Produced with Portland Limestone Cement: Canadian Studies,” SN 3142, American Cement Association, Washington, DC, 2010.
21. Lothenbach, B.; Le Saout, G.; Gallucci, E.; and Scrivener, K., “Influence of Limestone on the Hydration of Portland Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 6, 2008, pp. 848-860. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002
22. Péra, J.; Husson, S.; and Guilhot, B., “Influence of Finely Ground Limestone on Cement Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 21, No. 2, 1999, pp. 99-105. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00020-1
23. Bentz, D. P.; Ferraris, C. F.; Jones, S. Z.; Lootens, D.; and Zunino, F., “Limestone and Silica Powder Replacements for Cement: Early-Age Performance,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 78, 2017, pp. 43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.001
24. Kakali, G.; Tsivilis, S.; Aggeli, E.; and Bati, M., “Hydration Products of C3A, C3S and Portland Cement in the Presence of CaCO3,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1073-1077. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00292-1
25. Avet, F., and Scrivener, K., “Investigation of the Calcined Kaolinite Content on the Hydration of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, 2018, pp. 124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016
26. Antoni, M.; Rossen, J.; Martirena, F.; and Scrivener, K., “Cement Substitution by a Combination of Metakaolin and Limestone,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1579-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006
27. Mañosa, J.; Calderón, A.; Salgado-Pizarro, R.; Maldonado-Alameda, A.; and Chimenos, J. M., “Research Evolution of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3), a Promising Low-Carbon Binder – A Comprehensive Overview,” Heliyon, V. 10, No. 3, 2024, p. e25117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25117
28. Barrett, T. J.; Sun, H.; Nantung, T.; and Weiss, W. J., “Performance of Portland Limestone Cements,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2441, No. 1, 2013.
29. Scrivener, K. L.; John, V.; and Gartner, E. M., “Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2019, pp. 2-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015
30. Krishnan, S.; Emmanuel, A. C.; Shah, V.; Parashar, A.; Mishra, G.; Maity, S.; and Bishnoi, S., “Industrial Production of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) – Experience and Insights,” Green Materials, V. 7, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-47. doi: 10.1680/jgrma.18.00003
31. Bergold, S. T.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; and Neubauer, J., “Interaction of Silicate and Aluminate Reaction in a Synthetic Cement System: Implications for the Process of Alite Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 93, 2017, pp. 32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.12.006
32. Quennoz, A., and Scrivener, K. L., “Interactions between Alite and C3A-Gypsum Hydrations in Model Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 44, 2013, pp. 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.018
33. Minard, H.; Garrault, S.; Regnaud, L.; and Nonat, A., “Mechanisms and Parameters Controlling the Tricalcium Aluminate Reactivity in the Presence of Gypsum,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 37, No. 10, 2007, pp. 1418-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.001
34. Kanagaraj, B.; Anand, N.; Alengaram, U. J.; Raj, R. S.; and Karthick, S., “Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3): A Sustainable Solution for Mitigating Environmental Impact in the Construction Sector,” Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, V. 21, 2024, p. 200197. doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200197
35. Sánchez-Berriel, S.; Cancio-Díaz, Y.; Sánchez-Machado, I. R.; Martirena-Hernández, J. F.; Rosa-Domínguez, E. R.; and Habert, G., “Impacts Assessment of Local and Industrial LC3 in Cuban Context: Challenges and Opportunities,” Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, S. Bishnoi, ed., Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 263-270. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_30
36. Hu, Y.; Xiong, L.; Yan, Y.; and Geng, G., “Performance of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) Incorporating Low-Grade Marine Clay,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, V. 20, 2024, p. e03283. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03283
37. Dixit, A.; Du, H.; and Pang, D. S., “Marine Clay in Ultra-High-Performance Concrete for Filler Substitution,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 263, 2020, p. 120250. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120250
38. Zunino, F., and Scrivener, K., “The Reaction between Metakaolin and Limestone and its Effect in Porosity Refinement and Mechanical Properties,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 140, 2021, p. 106307. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106307
39. Du, H., and Pang, S. D., “Value-Added Utilization of Marine Clay as Cement Replacement for Sustainable Concrete Production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 198, 2018, pp. 867-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.068
40. Tironi, A.; Scian, A. N.; and Irassar, E. F., “Blended Cements with Limestone Filler and Kaolinitic Calcined Clay: Filler and Pozzolanic Effects,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 29, No. 9, 2017, p. 04017116. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001965
41. Shi, Z. G.; Geiker, M. R.; Lothenbach, B.; De Weerdt, K.; Garzon, S. F.; Enemark-Rasmussen, K.; and Skibsted, J., “Friedel’s Salt Profiles from Thermogravimetric Analysis and Thermodynamic Modelling of Portland Cement-Based Mortars Exposed to Sodium Chloride Solution,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 78, 2017, pp. 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.002
42. EN 206:2013, “Concrete: Specification, Performance, Production, and Conformity,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
43. ASTM C597-16, “Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 4 pp.
44. AASHTO T 358-19, “Standard Method of Test for Surface Resistivity Indication of Concrete's Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2019, Washington, DC, 10 pp.
45. ASTM C1202-19, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 8 pp.
46. ISO 14040, “Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
47. Dhandapani, Y.; Sakthivel, T.; Santhanam, M.; Gettu, R.; and Pillai, R. G., “Mechanical Properties and Durability Performance of Concretes with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, 2018, pp. 136-151. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005
48. Miller, S. A.; Horvath, A.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “Impacts of Booming Concrete Production on Water Resources Worldwide,” Nature Sustainability, V. 1, No. 1, 2018, pp. 69-76. doi: 10.1038/s41893-017-0009-5
49. Hammond, G. P., and Jones, C. I., “Embodied Energy and Carbon in Construction Materials,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy, V. 161, No. 2, 2008, pp. 87-98. doi: 10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87
50. ecoinvent, https://ecoinvent.org/projects/. (last accessed Jan. 19, 2026)
51. Gursel, A. P., and Horvath, A., “Green Concrete LCA Webtool,” 2012, http://greenconcrete.berkeley.edu/concretewebtool.html. (last accessed Jan. 19, 2026)
52. Zhou, D.; Wang, R.; Tyrer, M.; Wong, H.; and Cheeseman, C., “Sustainable Infrastructure Development through Use of Calcined Excavated Waste Clay as a Supplementary Cementitious Material,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 168, 2017, pp. 1180-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.098.
53. Bediako, M., and Valentini, L., “Strength Performance and Life Cycle Assessment of High-Volume Low-Grade Kaolin Clay Pozzolan Concrete: A Ghanaian Scenario,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, V. 17, 2022, p. e01679. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01679
54. Andrade Neto, J. S.; De la Torre, A. G.; and Kirchheim, A. P., “Effects of Sulfates on the Hydration of Portland Cement – A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 279, 2021, p. 122428. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122428
55. Ménétrier, D.; Jawed, I.; and Skalny, J., “Effect of Gypsum on C3S Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 10, No. 5, 1980, pp. 697-701. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(80)90033-2
56. EN 12504-4:2004, “Testing Concrete - Part 4: Determination of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
57. Cheah, C. B.; Tiong, L. L.; Ng, E. P.; and Oo, C. W., “The Engineering Performance of Concrete Containing High Volume of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Pulverized Fly Ash with Polycarboxylate-Based Superplasticizer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 202, 2019, pp. 909-921. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.075
58. Scrivener, K. L.; Juilland, P.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “Advances in Understanding the Hydration of Portland Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 78, 2015, pp. 38-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.025
59. Snellings, R.; Mertens, G.; and Elsen, J., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, V. 74, No. 1, 2012, pp. 211-278. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2012.74.6
60. Layssi, H.; Ghods, P.; Alizadeh, A. R.; and Salehi, M., “Electrical Resistivity of Concrete Concepts, Applications, and Measurement Techniques,” Concrete International, V. 37, No. 5, May 2015, pp. 41-46.
61. Garces-Vargas, J. F.; Díaz-Cardenas, Y.; and Martirena Hernandez, J. F., “Evaluation of the Durability of Concrete with the Use of Calcined Clays and Limestone in Salinas, Ecuador,” Minerals, V. 14, No. 5, 2024, p. 460. doi: 10.3390/min14050460
62. Xuan, M.-Y.; Han, Y.; and Wang, X.-Y., “The Hydration, Mechanical, Autogenous Shrinkage, Durability, and Sustainability Properties of Cement–Limestone–Slag Ternary Composites,” Sustainability, V. 13, No. 4, 2021, p. 1881. doi: 10.3390/su13041881
63. Ramezanianpour, A. A.; Pilvar, A.; Mahdikhani, M.; and Moodi, F., “Practical Evaluation of Relationship between Concrete Resistivity, Water Penetration, Rapid Chloride Penetration and Compressive Strength,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 5, 2011, pp. 2472-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.069
64. Lothenbach, B., and Nonat, A., “Calcium Silicate Hydrates: Solid and Liquid Phase Composition,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 78, Part A, 2015, pp. 57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.019
65. Matschei, T.; Lothenbach, B.; and Glasser, F. P., “The Role of Calcium Carbonate in Cement Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 37, No. 4, 2007, pp. 551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.013
66. Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; and Hooton, R. D., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1244-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001
67. Lothenbach, B.; Matschei, T.; Möschner, G.; and Glasser, F. P., “Thermodynamic Modelling of the Effect of Temperature on the Hydration and Porosity of Portland Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.017