Title:
Axial Load Effects on Nuclear Reinforced-Concrete Shear Walls with High-Strength Reinforcing Bars under Ground Motion Sequences: Hybrid Simulation Testing and Modelling Assessment (Prepublished)
Author(s):
Mohamed Abouyoussef, Ahmed Akl, and Mohamed Ezzeldin
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
Keywords:
axial load ratio; high-strength reinforcement; hybrid simulation; low-aspect-ratio; nuclear facilities; RC shear walls
DOI:
10.14359/51749164
Date:
9/10/2025
Abstract:
Previous research studies have been conducted to study the seismic response of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls when designed using normal-strength reinforcement (NSR) versus high-strength reinforcement (HSR). Such studies demonstrated that the use of HSR has the potential to address several constructability issues in nuclear construction practice by reducing the required steel areas and subsequently rebar congestion. However, the response of nuclear RC shear walls (i.e., aspect ratios of less than one) with both HSR and axial loads has not yet been evaluated under ground motion sequences. As such, most nuclear design standards restrict the use of HSR in nuclear RC shear wall systems. Such design standards do not consider the influence of axial loads when the shear strength capacity of such walls is calculated. To address this gap, the current study investigates the influence of axial load on the performance of nuclear RC shear walls with HSR when subjected to ground motion sequences using hybrid simulation testing and modelling assessment techniques. In this respect, two RC shear walls (i.e., W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL), with an aspect ratio of 0.83, are investigated. Wall W2-HSR-AL had an axial load of 3.5% of its axial compressive strength, while wall W1-HSR had no axial load. The test walls were subjected to a wide range of ground motion records, from operational basis earthquake (OBE) to beyond design basis earthquake (BDBE) levels. The experimental results of the walls are discussed in terms of their damage sequences, cracking patterns, ductility capacities, effective periods, and rebar strains. The test results are then used to develop and validate a numerical OpenSees model that simulates the seismic response of nuclear RC shear walls with different axial load levels. Finally, the experimental and numerical results are compared to the current ASCE 41-23 backbone model for RC shear walls. The experimental results demonstrate that walls W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL showed similar crack patterns and subsequent shear-flexure failures; however, the former had wider cracks relative to the former during the different ground motion records. In addition, the axial load reduced the displacement ductility of wall W2-HSR-AL by 18% compared to wall W1-HSR. Moreover, the ASCE 41-23 backbone model was not able to adequately capture the seismic response of the two test walls. The current study enlarges the experimental and numerical/analytical database pertaining to the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls with HSR to facilitate their adoption in nuclear construction practice.