Title:
Behavior of Earthquake-Resistant Rectangular Walls with Mechanically Spliced Grade 100 Steel Bars
Author(s):
Utsav Neupane, Rémy D. Lequesne, Andrés Lepage, and David Darwin
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
122
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
155-167
Keywords:
couplers; drift ratio capacity; earthquake-resistant walls; high-strength reinforcement (HSR); mechanical splices; shear walls; uniform elongation
DOI:
10.14359/51746822
Date:
9/1/2025
Abstract:
Three large-scale reinforced concrete (RC) rectangular slender structural walls were subjected to cyclic displacement demands to establish whether, and under what conditions, mechanical splices can be used with Grade 100 (690) bars where yielding is expected. These tests were conducted because ACI 318-19 prohibits both lap splices and mechanical splices for high-strength longitudinal reinforcement (Grade 80 [550] and higher) in special structural walls where yielding is expected. Three mechanical splices were used that differed in connection type (one type per wall) and overall splice length. All longitudinal bars were mechanically spliced starting 2 in. (50 mm) from the wall base. Mechanical splices satisfying the specified minimum tensile strength criterion of ACI 318-19 Type 2 mechanical splices resulted in better wall behavior than reported for lap splices, but satisfying Type 2 requirements alone did not prevent bar fractures at the mechanical splice. Thus, Type 2 mechanical splice requirements are not recommended as the sole qualification criteria where yielding is expected. Test results also showed that mechanical splices with a strength not less than the actual bar tensile strength, such that bars systematically fail in direct tension tests away from the splice and therefore develop their actual uniform elongation, perform well and are recommended for use where yielding is expected in special structural walls.
Related References:
1. Thomas, A.; Davis, B.; Dadi, G. B.; and Goodrum, P. M., “Case Study on the Effect of 690 MPa (100 ksi) Steel Reinforcement on Concrete Productivity in Buildings,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, V. 139, No. 11, Feb. 2013, 9 pp.
2. Price, K. R.; Fields, D.; and Lowes, L. N., The Impact of High-Strength Reinforcing Steel on Current Design Practice, Charles Pankow Foundation, Vancouver, WA, 2014, 37 pp.
3. Park, H.-G.; Baek, J.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; and Shin, H.-M., “Cyclic Loading Tests for Shear Strength of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Walls with Grade 550 MPa Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 3, May-June 2015, pp. 299-310. doi: 10.14359/51687406
4. Baek, J.-W.; Park, H.-G.; Lee, J.-H.; and Bang, C.-J., “Cyclic Loading Test for Walls of Aspect Ratio 1.0 and 0.5 with Grade 550 MPa (80 ksi) Shear Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 4, July-Aug. 2017, pp. 969-982. doi: 10.14359/51689680
5. Baek, J.-W.; Park, H.-G.; Shin, H.-M.; and Yim, S.-J., “Cyclic Loading Test for Reinforced Concrete Walls (Aspect Ratio 2.0) with Grade 550 MPa (80 ksi) Shear Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 3, May-June 2017, pp. 673-686. doi: 10.14359/51689437
6. Cheng, M.-Y.; Hung, S.-C.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., “Earthquake-Resistant Squat Walls Reinforced with High-Strength Steel,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 1065-1076. doi: 10.14359/51688825
7. Ni, X.; Cao, S.; Liang, S.; Li, Y.; and Liu, Y., “High-Strength Bar Reinforced Concrete Walls: Cyclic Loading Test and Strength Prediction,” Engineering Structures, V. 198, Nov. 2019, 18 pp.
8. Dazio, A.; Beyer, K.; and Bachmann, H., “Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Plastic Hinge Analysis of RC Structural Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 31, July 2009, pp. 1556-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.018
9. Huq, M. S.; Burgos, E. A.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., “High-Strength Steel Bars in Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete T-Shaped Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 215-226.
10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
11. Lowes, L. N.; Lehman, D. E.; Birely, A. C.; Kuchma, D. A.; Marley, K. P.; and Hart, C. R., “Earthquake Response of Slender Planar Concrete Walls with Modern Detailing,” Engineering Structures, V. 43, Oct. 2012, pp. 31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.040
12. Johnson, B. M., “Longitudinal Reinforcement Anchorage Detailing Effects on RC Structural Wall Behavior,” MS thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2007, 353 pp.
13. Aaleti, S.; Brueggen, B. L.; Johnson, B.; French, C. E.; and Sritharan, S., “Cyclic Response of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Different Anchorage Details: Experimental Investigation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1181-1191. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000732
14. Villalobos, E., “Seismic Response of Structural Walls with Geometric and Reinforcement Discontinuities,” PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2014, 306 pp.
15. Lloyd, W. R., “Qualification of the Bar-Lock Rebar Coupler for Use in Nuclear Safety-Related Applications Mechanical Testing Program and Performance Analysis,” Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Materials Department, Report No. INEEL/EXT-02-01387, Dec. 2001, 22 pp.
16. Jansson, P. O., “Evaluation of Grout-Filled Mechanical Splices for Precast Concrete Construction,” Construction and Technology Division Report, Report No. R-1512, May 2008, 74 pp.
17. Rowell, S. P.; Grey, C. E.; Woodson, S. C.; and Hager, K. P., “High Strain-Rate Testing of Mechanical Couplers,” Engineer Research and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Report No. ERDC TR:09-8, Sept. 2009, 74 pp.
18. Alam, M. S.; Youssef, M. A.; and Nehdi, M. L., “Exploratory Investigation on Mechanical Anchors for Connecting SMA Bars to Steel or FRP Bars,” Materials and Structures, V. 43, Apr. 2010, pp. 91-107. doi: 10.1617/s11527-010-9601-0
19. Ameli, M. J.; Parks; J. E.; Brown, D. N.; and Pantelides, C. P., “Seismic Evaluation of Grouted Splice Sleeve Connections for Precast Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers,” Proceedings of the 7th National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways, Paper A3-5, J. Kapur and T. Ostrom, eds., MCEER, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2013.
20. Henin, E., and Morcous, G., “Non-Proprietary Bar Splice Sleeve for Precast Concrete Construction,” Engineering Structures, V. 83, Jan. 2015, pp. 154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.045
21. Haber, Z. B.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Sanders, D. H., “Behavior and Simplified Modeling of Mechanical Reinforcing Bar Splices,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2015, pp. 179-188. doi: 10.14359/51687455
22. Yang, Y.; Sneed, L. H.; Morgan, A.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Belarbi, A., “Repair of RC Bridge Columns with Interlocking Spirals and Fractured Longitudinal Bars—An Experimental Study,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 78, Mar. 2015, pp. 405-420. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.010
23. Bompa, D. V., and Elghazouli, A. Y., “Ductility Considerations for Mechanical Reinforcement Couplers,” Structures, V. 12, Nov. 2017, pp. 115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2017.08.007
24. Bompa, D. V., and Elghazouli, A. Y., “Monotonic and Cyclic Performance of Threaded Reinforcement Splices,” Structures, V. 16, Nov. 2018, pp. 358-372. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.009
25. Dahal, P. K., and Tazarv, M., “Mechanical Bar Splices for Incorporation in Plastic Hinge Regions of RC Members,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 258, Oct. 2020, 17 pp.
26. ASTM A615/A615M-22, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 8 pp.
27. ASTM A706/A706M-22a, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 9 pp.
28. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S., “Seismic Design of Bridge Columns Incorporating Mechanical Bar Splices in Plastic Hinge Regions,” Engineering Structures, V. 124, Oct. 2016, pp. 507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.041
29. Haber, Z. B.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Sanders, D. H., “Seismic Performance of Precast Columns with Mechanically Spliced Column-Footing Connections,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 3, May-June 2014, pp. 639-650. doi: 10.14359/51686624
30. Bompa, D. V., and Elghazouli, A. Y., “Inelastic Cyclic Behavior of RC Members Incorporating Threaded Reinforcement Couplers,” Engineering Structures, V. 180, Feb. 2019, pp. 468-483. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.053
31. Oesterle, R. G.; Fiorato, A. E.; Johal, L. S.; Carpenter, J. E.; Russell, H. G.; and Corley, W. G., “Earthquake Resistant Structural Walls – Tests of Isolated Walls,” Report No. NSF/RA-760815, National Science Foundation, Nov. 1976, 321 pp.
32. Thomsen, J. H. IV, “Displacement Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls: An Experimental Investigation of Walls with Rectangular and T-Shaped Cross-Sections,” PhD dissertation, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, 1995, 353 pp.
33. Riva, P., and Franchi, A., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Welded Wire Mesh Subjected to Cyclic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 3, May-June 2001, pp. 324-334.
34. Ghorbani-Renani, I.; Velev, N.; Tremblay, R.; Palermo, D.; Massicotte, B.; and Leger, P., “Modeling and Testing Influence of Scaling Effects on Inelastic Response of Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 3, May-June 2009, pp. 358-367.
35. Pollalis, W., and Pujol, S., “Drift Capacity of Structural Walls with Lap Splices,” Bowen Laboratory Research Reports, Paper 2, May 2020, 135 pp.
36. Abdullah, S., and Wallace, J., “UCLA-RC Walls Database for Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls,” Proceedings of the Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, June 25-29, 2018, 5 pp.
37. Pujol, S.; Song, C.; Wang, Y.; Puranam, A.; and Usta, M., “ACI 445B Shear Wall Database,” ACI Subcommittee 445-B, 2019, https://datacenterhub.org/landingpages/318/318_LandingPage.html. (last accessed Oct. 24, 2025)
38. Neupane, U.; Lequesne, R. D.; Lepage, A.; and Darwin, D., “Mechanically-Spliced High-Strength Steel Bars in Earthquake-Resistant Walls,” SM Report No. 165, The University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 2025, 320 pp.
39. ASTM A370-23, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, 51 pp.
40. ASTM E8/E8M-16, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 24 pp.
41. Bridge Construction Records and Procedures Manual, “Bridge Construction Memo (BCM) 52-6 Attachment 1, Reinforcement Splices,” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2022, 14 pp.
42. AASHTO, “LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2020, 1912 pp.
43. California Test 670, “Method of Tests for Mechanical and Welded Reinforcing Steel Splices,” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2013, 12 pp.
44. ASTM C39/C39M-23, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, 8 pp.
45. ASTM C31/C31M-23, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, 7 pp.
46. Neupane, U.; Lequesne, R. D.; Lepage, A.; and Darwin, D., “DATASET: Results from Cyclic Tests of Earthquake-Resistant Rectangular Walls Mechanically-Spliced High-Strength Reinforcement,” KU Scholarworks, Lawrence, KS, Jan. 2025.