Damage Constitutive Model of Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Compression

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Damage Constitutive Model of Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Compression

Author(s): Jun Wu, Yahong Ding, Meng Guo, and Shuqi Guo

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 123

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 143-154

Keywords: accelerated carbonation; damage constitutive model; damage variable; evolution law; recycled aggregate concrete (RAC); stress-strain curve

DOI: 10.14359/51746760

Date: 1/1/2026

Abstract:
The effects of carbonated aggregate and aggregate replacement ratio on the stress-strain behavior of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) under uniaxial compression were studied, and based on Lemaitre’s strain equivalence hypothesis and Weibull distribution, a damage constitutive model was proposed. The results showed that carbonated aggregate enhanced peak stress. As the aggregate replacement ratio increased, the slopes of both the ascending and descending sections of the stress-strain curve gradually decreased, resulting in reduced peak stresses and decreased material brittleness. The damage constitutive model modified using linear regression analysis could describe the stress-strain curves well. As the aggregate replacement ratio increased, the slope of the “S” curve representing the damage variable evolution law gradually slowed down, and the corresponding strain gradually increased when the damage variable was 1. Meanwhile, the shape of the “parabola” curve representing the damage variable evolution rate became wider, and its vertex gradually decreased.

Related References:

1. de Andrade Salgado, F., and de Andrade Silva, F., “Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Waste Towards an Application on Structural Concrete: A Review,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 52, 2022, p. 104452.

2. Ma, K.; Huang, X.; and Hu, M., “Damage Constitutive Model of Brick-Concrete Recycled Coarse Aggregates Concrete,” Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao, V. 25, No. 2, 2022, pp. 131-141.

3. Zhang, T.; Chen, M.; Wang, Y.; and Zhang, M., “Roles of Carbonated Recycled Fines and Aggregates in Hydration, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Concrete: A Critical Review,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 138, 2023, p. 104994.

4. Ouyang, K.; Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Song, B.; Guo, H.; Li, G.; and Shi, C., “Influence of Pre-Treatment Methods for Recycled Concrete Aggregate on the Performance of Recycled Concrete: A Review,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 188, 2023, p. 106717.

5. Bahraq, A. A.; Jose, J.; Shameem, M.; and Maslehuddin, M., “A Review on Treatment Techniques to Improve the Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete: Enhancement Mechanisms, Performance and Cost Analysis,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 55, 2022, p. 104713.

6. Liu, B.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Z.; and Bai, G., “Study on the Stress-Strain Full Curve of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Compression,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 363, 2023, p. 129884.

7. Yang, H.; Fang, J.; Jiang, J.; Li, M.; and Mei, J., “Compressive Stress-Strain Curve of Recycled Concrete under Repeated Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 387, 2023, p. 131598.

8. Li, Y.; Chen, P.; Liu, Y.; and Zhang, L., “Study on Axial Compressive Behavior and Stress-Strain Relationship of Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Slag Recycled Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 408, 2023, p. 133606.

9. Hu, J., and Wu, J., “Mechanical Properties and Uni-Axial Compression Stress-Strain Relation of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete Subjected to Salt-Frost Cycles,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 197, 2019, pp. 652-666.

10. Liu, C.; Xing, L.; Liu, H.; Huang, W.; Nong, X.; and Xu, X., “Experimental on Repair Performance and Complete Stress-Strain Curve of Self-Healing Recycled Concrete under Uniaxial Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 285, 2021, p. 122900.

11. Chen, A.; Han, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; and Guo, T., “Mechanical and Stress-Strain Behavior of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Rubberized Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 260, 2020, p. 119888.

12. Kazmi, S. M. S.; Munir, M. J.; Wu, Y.; Patnaikuni, I.; Zhou, Y.; and Xing, F., “Axial Stress-Strain Behavior of Macro-Synthetic Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 97, 2019, pp. 341-356.

13. Luo, S.; Ye, S.; Xiao, J.; Zheng, J.; and Zhu, Y., “Carbonated Recycled Coarse Aggregate and Uniaxial Compressive Stress-Strain Relation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 188, 2018, pp. 956-965.

14. GB 50010-2002, “Code for Design of Concrete Structures,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2002, 211 p.

15. GB/T 50010-2010 (2024 edition), “Code for Design of Concrete Structures,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2024, 246 pp.

16. fib, “fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010,” Lausanne, 2013, 318 p.

17. Cao, F.; Zhang, X.; and Yang, X., “Experimental Study on Full Stress-Strain Curve of Recycled Concrete After Composite Salt Freezing,” Journal of Building Structures, V. 43, 2022, pp. 362-372.

18. Xu, M.; Wang, T.; and Chen, Z., “Experimental Research on Uniaxial Compressive Stress-Strain Relationship of Recycled Concrete After High Temperature,” Journal of Building Structures, V. 36, No. 2, 2015, pp. 158-164.

19. Xiao, J.; Zhang, K.; and Akbarnezhad, A., “Variability of Stress-Strain Relationship for Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Compression Loading,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 181, 2018, pp. 753-771.

20. GB/T 14684-2022, “Sand for Construction,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2022, 55 pp.

21. GB/T 14685-2022, “Pebble and Crushed Stone for Construction,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2022, 49 pp.

22. JGJ 55-2011, “Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2011, 45 pp.

23. JGJ/T 443-2018, “Technical Standard for Recycled Concrete Structures,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2018.

24. GB/T 50081-2019, “Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties,” Standardization Administration of China, Beijing, China, 2019.

25. Belén, G.; Fernando, M.; Diego, C. L.; and Sindy, S., “Stress-Strain Relationship in Axial Compression for Concrete using Recycled Saturated Coarse Aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 5, 2011, pp. 2335-2342.

26. Tang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Tam, V. W. Y.; and Li, W., “Uniaxial Compressive Behaviors of Fly Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymeric Concrete with Recycled Aggregates,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 104, 2019, p. 103375.

27. Chen, J.; Geng, Y.; and Wang, Y., “Basic Mechanical Properties and Stress-Strain Relationship for Recycled Concrete Including Crushed Clay Bricks,” Journal of Building Structures, V. 41, No. 12, 2020, pp. 184-192.

28. Xiao, J.; Li, W.; Corr, D. J.; and Shah, S. P., “Effects of Interfacial Transition Zones on the Stress-Strain Behavior of Modeled Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 52, 2013, pp. 82-99.

29. Lemaitre, J., “How to use Damage Mechanics,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 80, 1984, pp. 233-245.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer