Serviceability Wind Design of Reinforced Concrete Tall Buildings

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Serviceability Wind Design of Reinforced Concrete Tall Buildings

Author(s): Thomas Kang and Hamidreza Alinejad

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 364

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 121-137

Keywords: dynamic response; limit states; performance; reinforced concrete; serviceability, stiffness, strength; tall building; wind loads

DOI: 10.14359/51745460

Date: 12/1/2024

Abstract:

Design of buildings to withstand wind loads necessitates meeting criteria for two limit states: serviceability under frequent loads and strength under extreme loads. Performance-based wind design (PBWD) represents the state-of-the-art approach to wind design that provides a comprehensive framework for estimating wind load, assessing structural dynamic response, and achieving safe and cost-effective design solutions. This paper presents an overview of the current design methodology and the associated challenges in addressing serviceability wind design concerns, particularly for tall buildings with reinforced concrete structural systems. Firstly, the wind actions on buildings are briefly outlined in this paper, and the limit states and criteria governing the serviceability wind design, including comfort, deformation, and strength considerations, are discussed. Additionally, the inherent connections between serviceability wind design and seismic design for tall buildings are elaborated. Subsequently, the requirements for wind hazards, structural modeling, analysis technique, damping, and stiffness modification factors are explained. Finally, a detailed examination of serviceability wind design is provided through a case study involving a reinforced concrete tall building for further insight and discussion.

Related References:

ACI (2019), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-19). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

AIJ (2004), Guidelines for the Evaluation of Habitability to Building Vibration, Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan.

AIJ (2015). Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (AIJ-RLB-2015). Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan. (English version, 2018)

Alinejad, H., Ahn, B., and Kang, T. H.-K. (2024). Performance-Based Wind Design of Tall Buildings Considering Corner Modification and Inelastic Behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering, 150(7), 05024003.

Alinejad, H., Jeong, S. Y., and Kang, T. H.-K. (2020). Performance-Based Design of Tall Buildings for Wind Load and Application of Response Modification Factor. Wind and Structures, 31(2): 153–164.

Alinejad, H., Kang, T. H.-K., and Jeong, S. Y. (2021). Performance-Based Wind Design Framework Proposal for Tall Buildings. Wind and Structures, 32(4), 283-292.

Anzola, E. (2016), Performance-Based Design of Buildings Subjected to Wind Loads. Concrete International, 38(12), 37-41.

ASCE (2023), Prestandard for Performance-Based Wind Design, V1.1, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

ASCE (2022). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-22).Reston, VA.

Aswegan, K., Charney, F. A., and Jarrett, J. (2015). Recommended Procedures for Damage-Based Serviceability Design of Steel Buildings under Wind Loads. Engineering Journal, 52(1), 1-26.

Boggs, D. and Dragovich, J. (2006), The Nature of Wind Loads and Dynamic Response. Special Publication, ACI SP-240, 15-44.

Charney, F. A. (1990). Wind Drift Serviceability Limit State Design of Multistory Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 36(1–3), 203–212.

ISO (2007), Bases for Design of Structures - Serviceability of Buildings and Walkways Against Vibrations (ISO 10137), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO (2009). Wind Actions on Structures (ISO 4354). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jafari, M. and Alipour, A. (2021). Methodologies to Mitigate Wind-induced Vibration of Tall Buildings: A State-ofthe-Art Review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101582.

Jeong, S. Y., Alinejad, H., and Kang, T. H.-K. (2021). Performance-Based Wind Design of High-Rise Buildings using Generated Time-history Wind Loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 147(9): 04021134.

KDS (Korean Design Standard) (2022). Korean Design Standard (KDS 41-22). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korea, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)

Kwok, K. C., Burton, M. D., and Abdelrazaq, A. K. (2015), Wind-Induced Motion of Tall Buildings: Designing for Habitability, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

TBI. (2017). Guidelines for Performance-based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings (TBI 2017). Tall Building Initiative, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

Spence, S. M. J. and Kareem, A. (2014). Tall Buildings and Damping: A Concept-Based Data-Driven Model. Journal of Structural Engineering. 140 (5): 04014005.

Tamura, Y. (2012). Amplitude Dependency of Damping in Buildings and critical tip drift ratio. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 1(1), 1-13.

Tamura, Y., Kawai, H., Uematsu, Y., Marukawa, H., Fujii, K., and Taniike, Y. (1996). Wind Load and Wind-Induced Response Estimations in the Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (AIJ 1993). Engineering Structures, 18(6), 399-411.

Tamura, Y., Kawai, H., Uematsu, Y., Okada, H. and Ohkuma, T. (2004). Documents for Wind Resistant Design of Buildings in Japan. In Workshop on Regional Harmonization of Wind Loading and Wind Environmental Specifications in Asia-Pacific Economies (APEC-WW), Atsugi, Japan.

Tse, K. T., Hitchcock, P. A., Kwok, K. C., Thepmongkorn, S., and Chan, C. M (2009). Economic Perspectives of Aerodynamic Treatments of Square Tall Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 97(9–10), 455-467.