Cyclic Responses of Axially Restrained Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Cyclic Responses of Axially Restrained Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams

Author(s): Min-Yuan Cheng, Ren-Jie Tsai, Jui-Cheng Hung, and Richard S. Henry

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 122

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 105-117

Keywords: axial restraint; coupling beams; deformation; diagonal; stiffness; strength

DOI: 10.14359/51744395

Date: 5/1/2025

Abstract:
This research aims to investigate cyclic responses of axially restrained diagonally reinforced coupling beams, where the applied axial force was proportional to the beam axial elongation. Six diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams with an aspect ratio of 2.0 were tested under reversed cyclic displacements. The key test parameters included the magnitude of axial restraint and shear stress demand. The test results showed that the specimen deformations were primarily attributed to the beam end rotation. Specimen peak strength, which increased as the axial restraint was applied, can be reasonably estimated using probable flexural strength at the beam ends where the axial restraint force was considered. All specimens exhibited a minimum of 6.0% chord rotation prior to failure, and the failure mechanism was associated with the damage at beam ends and reinforcement anchorage. The ultimate chord rotation capacity, shear rigidity, and flexural rigidity of the specimens were found to be insensitive to both shear stress demand and the magnitude of axial restraint. Axially restrained specimens showed significantly reduced axial elongation compared to those without axial restraint. The axial elongation of specimens without axial restraint can be adequately estimated using existing models. Analysis indicated an average flexural and shear rigidity of 0.13EcIg and 0.41GcAg, respectively, for all tested specimens.

Related References:

ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.

Ameen, S.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., 2020, “Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams with Grade 120 (830) High-Strength Steel Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 6, Nov., pp. 199-210.

ASCE/SEI 41-17, 2017, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 576 pp.

ASTM A706/A706M-22, 2022, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 7 pp.

Barbachyn, S. M.; Kurama, Y. C.; and Novak, L. C., 2012, “Analytical Evaluation of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams under Lateral Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 497-507.

Cheng, M.-Y.; Fikri, R.; and Chen, C.-C., 2015, “Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete and Hybrid Coupled Shear Wall Systems,” Engineering Structures, V. 82, Jan., pp. 214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.039

Cheng, M.-Y.; Gitomarsono, J.; and Zeng, H.-Y., 2019, “Cyclic Test of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beam with Different Shear Demand,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 6, Nov., pp. 241-250. doi: 10.14359/51718010

Fenwick, R. C., and Megget, L. M., 1993, “Elongation and Load Deflection Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Plastic Hinges,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 26, No. 1, pp. 28-41. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.26.1.28-41

Galano, L., and Vignoli, A., 2000, “Seismic Behavior of Short Coupling Beams with Different Reinforcement Layouts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 876-885.

Lepage, A.; Lequesne, R. D.; Weber-Kamin, A. S.; Ameen, S.; and Cheng, M.-Y., 2023, “Chord Rotation Capacity and Strength of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 120, No. 6, Nov., pp. 137-150.

Lequesne, R. D.; Parra-Montesinos, G. J.; and Wight, J. K., 2013, “Seismic Behavior and Detailing of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams and Coupled Wall Systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 8, Aug., pp. 1362-1370. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000687

Moehle, J. P., 2015, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 1116 pp.

NZS 3101.1&2:2006, 2006, “Concrete Structures Standard (NZS 3101:Part 1:2006) and Concrete Structures Standard – Commentary (NZS 3101:Part 2:2006),” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.

Oesterle, R. G.; Fiorato, A. E.; Johal, L. S.; Carpenter, J. E.; Russell, H. G.; and Corley, W. G., 1976, “Earthquake Resistant Structural Walls - Tests of Isolated Walls,” Report No. NSF/RA-760815, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 328 pp.

Paulay, T., 1969, “The Coupling of Shear Walls - Volume 2,” PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 213 pp.

Paulay, T., and Binney, J. R., 1974, “Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” Shear in Reinforced Concrete, SP-42, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 579-598.

Poudel, A.; Ameen, S.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., 2021, “Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams: Effects of Axial Restraint,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 6, Nov., pp. 293-303.

Tegos, I. A., and Penelis, G. G., 1988, “Seismic Resistance of Short Columns and Coupling Beams Reinforced with Inclined Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 82-88.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer