Title:
Performance of Mechanical Couplers of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars under Inelastic Strain Demands
Author(s):
L. K. Sharma, W. Abdullah, S. Niroula, N. Budhathoki, and W. M. Ghannoum
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
122
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
225-238
Keywords:
couplers; fatigue test; Grade 80 (550 MPa); inelastic cyclic tests; mechanical splices
DOI:
10.14359/51743341
Date:
1/1/2025
Abstract:
ACI 318 permits the use of mechanical couplers for Grade 60
(420 MPa) bars in hinge regions, but not for higher-grade bars.
This restriction was introduced due to limited testing of mechanical
couplers under inelastic strain demands and is hindering the use of
higher-grade bars in seismic regions. Eleven mechanical couplers
splicing Grade 80 (550 MPa) bars through varying connection
details were tested in a uniaxial testing machine to evaluate their
performance compared to bare bars under reversed cyclic inelastic
strain demands, akin to those experienced in hinge regions of
special seismic systems. The low-cycle fatigue life of coupled
subassemblies is compared to those of the bare bars tested under
the same loading protocol. Results indicate that some coupled
bars can have equivalent fatigue life to the bare bars, while others
can have substantially reduced fatigue life. A qualification test is
proposed to qualify mechanical splices for use in seismic hinge
regions of special concrete systems.
Related References:
1. Villalobos, E.; Escolano-Margarit, D.; Ramírez-Márquez, A. L.; and Pujol, S., “Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Lap Splices,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, V. 15, No. 5, 2017, pp. 2079-2100. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0051-0
2. Almeida, J. P.; Prodan, O.; Tarquini, D.; and Beyer, K., “Influence of Lap Splices on the Deformation Capacity of RC Walls. I: Database Assembly, Recent Experimental Data, and Findings for Model Development,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 143, No. 12, 2017, p. 04017156. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001853
3. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
4. Sokoli, D., and Ghannoum, W. M., “High-Strength Reinforcement in Columns under High Shear Stresses,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 3, May-June 2016, pp. 605-614. doi: 10.14359/51688203
5. To, D. V.; Sokoli, D.; Ghannoum, W. M.; and Moehle, J. P., “Seismic Performance of Tall Moment Frames with High-Strength Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 113-124.
6. Rautenberg, J. M.; Pujol, S.; Tavallali, H.; and Lepage, A., “Reconsidering the Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 37, 2012, pp. 135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.036
7. Huq, M. S.; Weber-Kamin, A. S.; Ameen, S.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., “High-Strength Steel Bars in Reinforced Concrete Walls: Influence of Steel Mechanical Properties on Deformation Capacity,” Charles Pankow Foundation, Haymarket, VA, 2017, 318 pp.
8. Barcley, L., and Kowalsky, M., “Seismic Performance of Circular Concrete Columns Reinforced with High-Strength Steel,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 2, 2020, p. 04019198. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002452
9. Sokoli, D.; Hogsett, G.; Limantono, A.; Suselo, A.; Al-Tarafany, D.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Acceptable Elongations and Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance for High-Strength Reinforcing Bars,” Charles Pankow Foundation, Haymarket, VA, 2019, 213 pp.
10. ASTM A706/A706M-16, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp.
11. Brown, J., and Kunnath, S. K., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Failure of Reinforcing Steel Bars,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 457-466.
12. Mander, J. B.; Panthaki, F. D.; and Kasalanati, A., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Reinforcing Steel,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 6, No. 4, 1994, pp. 453-468. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453)
13. Sokoli, D.; Limantono, A.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Special Moment Frames with High-Strength Reinforcement—Part 2: Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 2, Mar. 2020, pp. 253-265.
14. Zhong, K.; Ghannoum, W. M.; and Deierlein, G. G., “Influence of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars on Seismic Safety of Concrete Frames,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 5, Sept. 2021, pp. 299-311.
15. To, D. V., and Moehle, J. P., “Special Moment Frames with High-Strength Reinforcement—Part 1: Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 2, Mar. 2020, pp. 239-252.
16. Brueggen, B.; Waugh, J.; Aaleti, S.; Johnson, B.; French, C.; Sritharan, S.; and Nakaki, S. D., “Tests of Structural Walls to Determine Deformation Contributions of Interest for Performance-Based Design,” Structural Engineering Research Frontiers: Proceedings of the Research Frontiers Sessions of Structures Congress 2007, J. W. Wallace, ed., Long Beach, CA, 2007, pp. 1-16.
17. Haber, Z. B.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Sanders, D. H., “Seismic Performance of Precast Columns with Mechanically Spliced Column-Footing Connection,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 3, May-June 2014, pp. 639-650. doi: 10.14359/51686624
18. Haber, Z. B., “Precast Column-Footing Connections for Accelerated Bridge Construction in Seismic Zones,” PhD dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, 2013, 612 pp.
19. Haber, Z. B.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Sanders, D. H., “Behavior and Simplified Modeling of Mechanical Reinforcing Bar Splices,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2015, pp. 179-188. doi: 10.14359/51687455
20. NZS 3101.1:2006, “Concrete Structures Standard - Part 1: The Design of Concrete Structures,” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
21. California Test 670, “Method of Tests for Mechanical and Welded Reinforcing Steel Splices,” California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Sacramento, CA, 2013, 13 pp.
22. AASHTO, “AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design,” second edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2011.
23. Sokoli, D.; Limantono, A.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Plasticity Spread in Columns Reinforced with High Strength Steel,” Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE 2017), Santiago, Chile, 2017, Paper No. 234, 11 pp.
24. Sokoli, D.; Limantono, A. A.; Hogsett, G.; Al-Teraffy, D.; To, D. V.; Moehle, J. P.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Critical Strain Demands for Performance Evaluation of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars,” Proceedings of the Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (11NCEE), Los Angeles, CA, 2018, pp. 1-7.
25. ASTM A706/A706M-22a, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 9 pp.
26. ASTM E8/E8M-22, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 31 pp.
27. Ameli, M. J.; Brown, D. N.; Parks, J. E.; and Pantelides, C. P., “Seismic Column-to-Footing Connections Using Grouted Splice Sleeves,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 1021-1030. doi: 10.14359/51688755
28. Bompa, D. V., and Elghazouli, A. Y., “Inelastic Cyclic Behaviour of RC Members Incorporating Threaded Reinforcement Couplers,” Engineering Structures, V. 180, 2019, pp. 468-483. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.053
29. Dahal, P. K., and Tazarv, M., “Mechanical Bar Splices for Incorporation in Plastic Hinge Regions of RC Members,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 258, 2020, Article No. 120308 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120308
30. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S., “Seismic Design of Bridge Columns Incorporating Mechanical Bar Splices in Plastic Hinge Regions,” Engineering Structures, V. 124, 2016, pp. 507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.041
31. AC133, “Acceptance Criteria for Mechanical Connector Systems for Steel Reinforcing Bars,” ICC Evaluation Service, Brea, CA, 2010.
32. ISO 15835-1:2018, “Steels for the Reinforcement of Concrete—Reinforcement Couplers for Mechanical Splices of Bars–Part 1: Requirements,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, 9 pp.
33. Slavin, C. M., and Ghannoum, W. M., “Defining Structurally Acceptable Properties of High-Strength Steel Bars through Material and Column Testing - Part 1: Material Testing Report,” Charles Pankow Foundation, Haymarket, VA, 2015, 135 pp.
34. Ghannoum, W. M., and Slavin, C. M., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance of High-Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 803-814. doi: 10.14359/51689116
35. ASTM A370-22, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 51 pp.
36. Rajaei, S.; Hogsett, G.; Chapagain, B.; Banjade, S.; and Ghannoum, W., “Vision-Based Large-Field Measurements of Bridge Deformations,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 28, No. 11, 2023, p. 04023075. doi: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5973
37. Sokoli, D.; Shekarchi, W.; Buenrostro, E.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Advancing Behavioral Understanding and Damage Evaluation of Concrete Members Using High-Resolution Digital Image Correlation Data,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 7, No. 5, 2014, pp. 609-626. doi: 10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.609
38. Gonzalez, J., “Improving Fatigue Life Properties of Steel Reinforcing Bars,” master’s thesis, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 2022, 144 pp.