Title:
Practical Recommendations for Defect Avoidance in Deep Foundations
Author(s):
Christopher Wilkes, Fragkoulis Kanavaris, Chris Barker, and Duncan Nicholson
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
121
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
67-76
Keywords:
concrete testing; rheology; tremie concrete
DOI:
10.14359/51742262
Date:
12/1/2024
Abstract:
This paper presents a method for simply qualifying the practical
risk of casting deep foundations based upon a combination of the
behavior of the fresh concrete through testing and the confinement
conditions of the foundation from a design perspective.
A framework to qualify which aspects of the tremie process lead
to defects is developed for the first time. Flow behavior, confinement
conditions, and free-water availability are identified as key
contributors to specific defects present within tremie concrete foundations. Finally, a novel risk map for tremie concrete is presented.
Related References:
1. EFFC/DFI Concrete Task Group, “Guide to Tremie Concrete for Deep Foundations,” European Federation of Foundation Contractors, Kent, UK, 2018, 83 pp.
2. Wilkes, C., “Modelling Tremie Concrete Placement in Deep Foundations,” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2021, 212 pp.
3. ICE, ICE Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls, third edition, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, UK, 2017, 248 pp.
4. Fierenkothen, C., “Numerische Simulationen und Laborversuche zur Ausbreitung von Frischbeton in Bohrpfählen,” Berichte des Lehr- und Forschungsgebietes Geotechnik, B. Walz and M. Pulsfort Wuppertal, eds., V. 38, 2019, 230 pp.
5. Fierenkothen, C., and Pulsfort, M., “Investigations on Fresh Concrete Flow Mechanisms in Bored Piles Based on CFD Simulations,” Proceedings, XVII European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ECSMGE-2019), Reykjavík, Iceland, 2019, 9 pp.
6. Wilkes, C.; Kumar, K.; and Biscontin, G., “Investigating the Thixotropic Behaviour of Tremie Concrete Using the Slump-Flow Test and the Material Point Method,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 143, 2023, Article No. 105222. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105222
7. Jeyaraj, J. A., “Numerical Modeling of Concrete Flow in Drilled Shaft,” PhD thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 2018, 125 pp.
8. Kränkel, T.; Weger, D.; Beckhaus, K.; Geppert, F.; Gehlen, C.; and Timothy, J. J., “Computational Analysis of Concrete Flow in a Reinforced Bored Pile Using the Porous Medium Approach,” Applied Mechanics, V. 3, No. 2, 2022, pp. 481-495. doi: 10.3390/applmech3020028
9. Rashad, A. M., “An Overview on Rheology, Mechanical Properties and Durability of High-Volume Slag Used as a Cement Replacement in Paste, Mortar and Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 187, 2018, pp. 89-117. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.150
10. Shanahan, N.; Tran, V.; Williams, A.; and Zayed, A., “Effect of SCM Combinations on Paste Rheology and Its Relationship to Particle Characteristics of the Mixture,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 123, 2016, pp. 745-753. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.094
11. Fonseca, T. V.; dos Anjos, M. A. S.; Ferreira, R. L. S.; Branco, F. G.; and Pereira, L., “Evaluation of Self-Compacting Concretes Produced with Ternary and Quaternary Blends of Different SCM and Hydrated-Lime,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 320, 2022, Article No. 126235. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126235
12. Tattersall, G. H., and Bloomer, S. J., “Further Development of the Two-Point Test for Workability and Extension of Its Range,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 109, 1979, pp. 202-210. doi: 10.1680/macr.1979.31.109.202
13. Qian, Y., and Kawashima, S., “Distinguishing Dynamic and Static Yield Stress of Fresh Cement Mortars through Thixotropy,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 86, 2018, pp. 288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.11.019
14. Roussel, N., ed., Understanding the Rheology of Concrete, Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 2011, 384 pp.
15. Roussel, N., “A Thixotropy Model for Fresh Fluid Concretes: Theory, Validation and Applications,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1797-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.025
16. Roussel, N.; Ovarlez, G.; Garrault, S.; and Brumaud, C., “The Origins of Thixotropy of Fresh Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 1, 2012, pp. 148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.004
17. Lecompte, T., and Perrot, A., “Non-Linear Modeling of Yield Stress Increase due to SCC Structural Build-Up at Rest,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 92, 2017, pp. 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.020
18. Koehler, E. P., and Fowler, D. W., “Development of a Portable Rheometer for Fresh Portland Cement Concrete,” Technical Report No. ICAR 105-3F, International Center for Aggregates Research, Austin, TX, 2004, 328 pp.
19. Wallevik, O. H.; Feys, D.; Wallevik, J. E.; and Khayat, K. H., “Avoiding Inaccurate Interpretations of Rheological Measurements for Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 78, Part A, 2015, pp. 100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.003
20. Feys, D.; Cepuritis, R.; Jacobsen, S.; Lesage, K.; Secrieru, E.; and Yahia, A., “Measuring Rheological Properties of Cement Pastes: Most Common Techniques, Procedures and Challenges,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 2, 2017, pp. 129-135. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.43
21. Feys, D.; Sonebi, M.; Amziane, S.; Djelal, C.; El-Cheikh, K.; Fataei, S.; Greim, M.; Ivanova, I.; Keller, H.; Khayat, K.; Libessart, L.; Mechtcherine, V.; Navarrete, I.; Perrot, A.; Secrieru, E.; and Vanhove, Y., “RILEM TC 266-MRP: Round-Robin Rheological Tests on High Performance Mortar and Concrete with Adapted Rheology—Rheometers, Mixtures and Procedures,” Materials and Structures, V. 56, No. 4, 2023, Article No. 90. doi: 10.1617/s11527-023-02173-1
22. BS EN 12350-8:2019, “Testing Fresh Concrete - Part 8: Self-
Compacting Concrete - Slump-Flow Test,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2019, 10 pp.
23. Wallevik, J. E., “Relationship between the Bingham Parameters and Slump,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 7, 2006, pp. 1214-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.001
24. Roussel, N., and Coussot, P., “‘Fifty-Cent Rheometer’ for Yield Stress Measurements: From Slump to Spreading Flow,” Journal of Rheology, V. 49, No. 3, 2005, pp. 705-718. doi: 10.1122/1.1879041
25. Saak, A. W.; Jennings, H. M.; and Shah, S. P., “A Generalized Approach for the Determination of Yield Stress by Slump and Slump Flow,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 3, 2004, pp. 363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.005
26. Feys, D.; Khayat, K. H.; and Khatib, R., “How Do Concrete Rheology, Tribology, Flow Rate and Pipe Radius Influence Pumping Pressure?” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 66, 2016, pp. 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.11.002
27. Roussel, N., and Gram, A., eds., Simulation of Fresh Concrete Flow: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee 222-SCF, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2014, 147 pp.
28. Kränkel, T., and Gehlen, C., “Rheology and Workability Testing of Deep Foundation Concrete in Europe and the US,” Research Report No. 20F-0107, Chair of Materials Science and Testing, Centre for Building Materials, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2018, 83 pp.
29. Feys, D., and Khayat, K. H., “Testing Concrete for Deep Foundations,” final report, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 2018.
30. Deeb, R.; Kulasegaram, S.; and Karihaloo, B. L., “3D Modelling of the Flow of Self-Compacting Concrete with or without Steel Fibres. Part I: Slump Flow Test,” Computational Particle Mechanics, V. 1, No. 4, 2014, pp. 373-389. doi: 10.1007/s40571-014-0002-y
31. Nielsson, I., and Wallevik, O. H., “Rheological Evaluation of Some Empirical Test Methods -Preliminary Results,” Proceedings of the 3rd International RILEM Symposium on Self-Compacting Concrete, O. Wallevik and I. Nielsson, eds., Reykjavík, Iceland, 2003, pp. 59-68.
32. Tanigawa, Y., and Mori, H., “Analytical Study on Deformation of Fresh Concrete,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 115, No. 3, 1989, pp. 493-508. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(493)
33. Thorp, A.; Wilkes, C.; Nicholson, D.; and Bryan, M., “Recent Experience with Tremie Concrete Properties and Testing,” Proceedings of the 2018 DFI-EFFC International Conference on Deep Foundations and Ground Improvement, Rome, Italy, 2018.
34. Larisch, M. D., “Concrete Defects in Bored Piles as a Result of Insufficient Applications of Chemical Admixtures,” Concrete NZ Conference 2019, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2019, 12 pp.
35. Mullins, G.; Ashmawy, A. K.; Anderson, B.; Deese, G.; Garbin, E.; Johnson, K.; Lowry, S.; Stokes, M.; Wagner, R. V.; and Winters, D., “Factors Affecting Anomaly Formation in Drilled Shafts,” University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 2005, 293 pp.
36. Böhle, B., and Pulsfort, M., “Fluid and Casing Supported Execution of Bored Piles and Their Effects on Concrete Flow Behaviour,” Proceedings, Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Geotechnik (DGGT) 33, Berlin, Germany, 2014.
37. Turgut, P.; Turk, K.; and Bakirci, H., “Segregation Control of SCC with a Modified L-Box Apparatus,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 64, No. 8, 2012, pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1680/macr.11.00144
38. Mouret, M.; Escadeillas, G.; and Bascoul, A., “Metrological Significance of the Column Test in the Assessment of the Static Segregation of Self-Compacting Concrete in the Fresh State,” Materials and Structures, V. 41, No. 4, 2008, pp. 663-679. doi: 10.1617/s11527-007-9272-7
39. PCI, “Interim Guidelines for the Use of Self-Consolidating Concrete in Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Member Plants,” Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2003.
40. ASTM C1611/C1611M-14, “Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 6 pp.
41. Hosseinpoor, M.; Khayat, K. H.; and Yahia, A., “Numerical Simulation of Self-Consolidating Concrete Flow as a Heterogeneous Material in L-Box Set-up: Effect of Rheological Parameters on Flow Performance,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 83, 2017, pp. 290-307. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.027
42. Tregger, N.; Gregori, A.; Ferrara, L.; and Shah, S., “Correlating Dynamic Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete to the Slump-Flow Test,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 28, No. 1, 2012, pp. 499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.052
43. Bonen, D., and Shah, S. P., “Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, V. 7, No. 1, 2005, pp. 14-26. doi: 10.1002/pse.186
44. AASHTO R 81-17 (2021), “Standard Practice for Static Segregation of Hardened Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC) Cylinders,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2021, 7 pp.
45. Ley Hernandez, A. M., “Influence of Mix Design Parameters on Dynamic Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete and Consequences on Performance of Precast Beams,” master’s thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 2016, 136 pp.
46. Larish, M., “Fundamental Mechanisms of Concrete Bleeding in Bored Piles,” Proceedings of the Concrete 2019 Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2019, pp. 8-11.
47. Larisch, M. D.; Higgins, K. G.; Ainsworth, Y.; Toll, D. G.; and Osman, A. S., “Concrete Bleeding in Deep Foundations as a Result of Aggregate Grading,” Piling 2020: Proceedings of the Piling 2020 Conference, K. G. Higgins, Y. Ainsworth, D. G. Toll, and A. S. Osman, eds., ICE Publishing, London, UK, 2021, pp. 299-304.
48. ASTM C232/C232M-20, “Standard Test Method for Bleeding of Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 3 pp.
49. Larisch, M. D., and Tutbury, P., “Concrete Filtration Testing to Assess the Risk of Concrete Bleeding in Bored Piles,” Proceedings, Concrete 2021 - Smart & Innovative Concrete from Disruption, Perth, WA, Australia, 8 pp.
50. BS EN 12350-5:2019, “Testing Fresh Concrete - Part 5: Flow Table Test,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2019, 12 pp.
51. BS 8500-1:2023, “Concrete - Complementary British Standard to BS EN 206. Method of Specifying and Guidance for the Specifier,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2023, 78 pp.