Implications of ACI CODE-440.11 Code Provisions on Design of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Footings

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Implications of ACI CODE-440.11 Code Provisions on Design of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Footings

Author(s): Zahid Hussain and Antonio Nanni

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 122

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 143-152

Keywords: building code; footing; glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement; reinforced concrete; shear

DOI: 10.14359/51742142

Date: 1/1/2025

Abstract:
The first edition of ACI CODE-440.11 was published in September 2022, where some code provisions were either based on limited research or only analytically developed. Therefore, some code provisions, notably shear and development length in footings, are difficult to implement. This study, through a design example, aims at a better understanding of the implications of code provisions in ACI CODE-440.11-22 and compares them with ones in CSA S806-12, thereby highlighting a need for reconsiderations. An example of the footing originally designed with steel reinforcement was taken from the ACI Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook and redesigned with GFRP reinforcement as per ACI CODE- 440.11-22 and CSA S806-12. A footing designed as per ACI CODE- 440.11-22 requires a thicker concrete cross section to satisfy shear requirements; however, when designed as per CSA S806-12, the required thickness becomes closer to that of the steel-reinforced concrete (RC) footing. The development length required for a glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete (GFRP-RC) cross section designed as per ACI CODE-440.11-22 was 13% and 92% greater than that designed as per CSA S806-12 and ACI 318-19, respectively. Also, the reinforcement area required to meet detailing requirements is 170% higher than that for steel-RC cross section. Based on the outcomes of this study, there appears to be a need for reconsideration of some code provisions in ACI CODE-440.11-22 to make GFRP reinforcement a viable option for RC members.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 440, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars — Code and Commentary (ACI CODE-440.11-22),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2023, 266 pp.

2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

3. CSA S806-12, “Design and Construction of Building Structures with Fiber Reinforced Polymers (Reaffirmed in 2017 and 2021 without changes),” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012, 208 pp.

4. American Concrete Institute, ACI Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook: A Companion to ACI 318-19, ACI MNL-17(21), H. R. Hamilton, ed., ACI, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, pp. 1-568.

5. ASTM D7957/D7957M-22, “Standard Specifications for Solid Round Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 5 pp.

6. ASCE 7-16, “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2016, 889 pp.

7. ASTM D8505/D8505M-23, “Standard Specifications for Solid Round Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, 5 pp.

8. Tureyen, K. A., and Frosch, R. J., “Concrete Shear Strength: Another Perspective,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2003, pp. 609-615.

9. Nanni, A.; De Luca, A.; Zadeh, H. J., FRP Reinforced Concrete Structures – Theory, Design and Practice, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Apr. 3, 2014, 400 pp.

10. Halvonik, J.; Borzovic, V.; and Laniova, D., “Comparison of Shear Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Steel Bars,” Structures, V. 43, 2022, pp. 657-668. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.065

11. Ospina, E. C., “Alternative for Concrete Punching Capacity Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Two-way Slabs,” Concrete International, V. 27, No. 9, Sept. 2005, pp. 53-57.

12. Ospina, C. E.; Alexander, D. B. S.; and Cheng, R. J. J., “Punching of Two-Way Concrete Slabs with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcing Bars or Grids,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2003, pp. 589-598.

13. El-Ghandour, A. W.; Pilakoutas, K.; and Waldron, P., “Punching Shear Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs: Experimental Study,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 7, No. 3, 2003, pp. 258-265. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(258)

14. Hassan, M.; Ahmed, E. A.; and Benmokrane, B., “Punching Shear Strength of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 40, 2013, pp. 951-960. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0177

15. Lee, H. J.; Yoon, Y. S.; Cook, D. W.; and Mitchell, D., “Improving Punching Shear Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Slabs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 4, July-Aug. 2009, pp. 427-434.

16. El-Gamal, S.; El-Salakawy, E. F.; and Benmokrane, B., “Behavior of Concrete Slabs Reinforced with FRP Bars Under Concentrated Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2005, pp. 727-734.

17. Bouguerra, K.; Ahmed, E. A.; El-Gamal, S.; and Benmokrane, B., “Testing of Full Scale Concrete Bridge Deck Slabs Reinforced with Fiber-

Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 10, 2011, pp. 3956-3965. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.028

18. Sarhan, I. A.; Mahmoud, A. S.; and Hussian, M. A., “Punching Shear Resistance of High Strength GFRP Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs,” Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 11, No. 1, pp. 72-93.

19. Dulude, C., and Hassan, M., “Punching Shear Behavior of Flat Slabs Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2013, pp. 723-725.

20. Kurtoğlu, A. E.; Bilgehan, M.; Gülşan, M. E.; and Çevik, A., “Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Punching Shear Strength of GFRP-Reinforced Two-Way Slabs,” Structural Engineering International, V. 33, No. 3, 2023, pp. 379-388. doi: 10.1080/10168664.2022.2093689

21. Wambeke, B. W., and Shield, C. K., “Development Length of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars in Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2006, pp. 11-17.

22. Ortiz, J. D.; Hussain, Z.; Hosseini, S. A.; Benmokrane, B.; and Nanni, A., “Lap Splice Assessment of GFRP Rebars in Reinforced Concrete Beams under Flexure,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 419, 2024, p. 135408. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135408

23. Ortiz, J. D.; Hussain, Z.; Hosseini, S. A.; Benmokrane, B.; and Nanni, A., “Assessment of the Flexural Bond Stresses of New Generation GFRP Bars,” Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-16), SP-360, A. M. Okeil, P. Sadeghian, J. J. Myers, and M. D. Lopez, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 318-329.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer