Effect of Sorghum Shives & Wheat Straw on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Sorghum Shives & Wheat Straw on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks

Author(s): Imane Gharbage, Ferhat Benmahiddine, Nassim Sebaibi

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 362

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 813-827

Keywords: compressed earth blocks; compressive strength; earthen construction materials; sorghum shives; thermal properties

DOI: 10.14359/51742011

Date: 6/17/2024

Abstract:
Combining earth with natural aggregates or fibers such as wheat straw, wood shavings, rice husks, bamboo, flax fibers, or animal hair, was a building technique used worldwide thousands of years ago. Today, Sorghum, an African plant, is cultivated globally with major production areas in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Australia. Its cultivation has also begun in Europe due to its versatility and adaptability to different environmental conditions. Sorghum serves several purposes, including human and animal food, animal forage, and silage, as well as industrial applications such as methanization, biofuels, and biomaterials production. This paper investigates the effect of different sorghum shives proportions (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) on the thermal and mechanical properties of compressed earth blocks. Furthermore, a comparison was conducted between the properties of sorghum shives and wheat straw-reinforced earth blocks. The measured properties were thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, and compressive strength. Moreover, microscopic observations were performed by using numerical microscopy to gain a better understanding of the materials' behavior. According to the different results, a significant decrease of 64% in thermal conductivity was obtained for reinforced compressed earth blocks. However, the compressive strength was affected negatively and a decrease of 62% and 65% was noted for sorghum shives and wheat straw-reinforced earth blocks, respectively. Finally, the formulations studied had an insignificant effect on the specific heat capacity.

Related References:

1. Energy System IEA, https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings (accessed September 09, 2023), (2023).

2. K. El Azhary, Y. Chihab, M. Mansour, N. Laaroussi, M. Garoum, Energy Efficiency and Thermal Properties of the Composite Material Clay-straw, Energy Procedia 141 (2017) 160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.030

3. A. Laborel-Préneron, C. Magniont, J.-E. Aubert, Hygrothermal properties of unfired earth bricks: Effect of barley straw, hemp shiv and corn cob addition, Energy Build 178 (2018) 265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.021

4. A. Laborel-Préneron, J.E. Aubert, C. Magniont, C. Tribout, A. Bertron, Plant aggregates and fibers in earth construction materials: A review, Constr Build Mater 111 (2016) 719–734. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.119

5. M. Giroudon, A. Laborel-Préneron, J.-E. Aubert, C. Magniont, Comparison of barley and lavender straws as bioaggregates in earth bricks, Constr Build Mater 202 (2019) 254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.126

6. A. Koutous, E. Hilali, Reinforcing rammed earth with plant fibers: A case study, Case Studies in Construction Materials 14 (2021) e00514. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00514

7. S.S. Tizapa, G.A. de la Cruz, A.C. Sandoval, A.M. Lozano, Á.M. Dimas, L.A. Patiño, Materials Characterization and Compressive Strength of Compressed Earth Blocks Reinforced with Oat Straw, in: 2023: pp. 689–698. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-21735-7_74

8. W. Benhaoua, K. Grine, S. Kenai, Performance of Stabilized Earth with Wheat Straw and Slag, MRS Adv 5 (2020) 1285–1294. doi: 10.1557/adv.2020.174

9. J. Hao, J. Huang, J. Yao, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, Unconfined compression strength and mesostructure of reinforced soil with wheat straw, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80 (2021) 9173–9183. doi: 10.1007/s10064-021-02473-2

10. G.A. Abanto, M. Karkri, G. Lefebvre, M. Horn, J.L. Solis, M.M. Gómez, Thermal properties of adobe employed in Peruvian rural areas: Experimental results and numerical simulation of a traditional biocomposite material, Case Studies in Construction Materials 6 (2017) 177–191.

doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.02.001

11. T. Ashour, A. Korjenic, S. Korjenic, W. Wu, Thermal conductivity of unfired earth bricks reinforced by agricultural wastes with cement and gypsum, Energy Build 104 (2015) 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.016

12. L. Aouba, C. Bories, M. Coutand, B. Perrin, H. Lemercier, Properties of fired clay bricks with incorporated biomasses: Cases of Olive Stone Flour and Wheat Straw residues, Constr Build Mater 102 (2016) 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.040

13. O. Khtou, I. Aalil, M. Aboussaleh, F.Z. EL Wardi, Mechanical Analysis of Fiber Reinforced Adobe, Civil Engineering and Architecture 9 (2021) 2160–2168. doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090705

14. A. Laborel-Préneron, J.-E. Aubert, C. Magniont, P. Maillard, C. Poirier, Effect of Plant Aggregates on Mechanical Properties of Earth Bricks, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29 (2017). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002096

15. A.B. Laibi, P. Poullain, N. Leklou, M. Gomina, D.K.C. Sohounhloué, Influence of the kenaf fiber length on the mechanical and thermal properties of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB), KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22 (2018) 785–793. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1968-9

16. P. Zak, T. Ashour, A. Korjenic, S. Korjenic, W. Wu, The influence of natural reinforcement fibers, gypsum and cement on compressive strength of earth bricks materials, Constr Build Mater 106 (2016) 179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.031

17. T. Colinart, T. Vinceslas, H. Lenormand, A.H. De Menibus, E. Hamard, T. Lecompte, Hygrothermal properties of light-earth building materials, Journal of Building Engineering 29 (2020) 101134. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101134

18. B. Taallah, A. Guettala, S. Guettala, A. Kriker, Mechanical properties and hygroscopicity behavior of compressed earth block filled by date palm fibers, Constr Build Mater 59 (2014) 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.058

19. M. Mostafa, N. Uddin, Experimental analysis of Compressed Earth Block (CEB) with banana fibers resisting flexural and compression forces, Case Studies in Construction Materials 5 (2016) 53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2016.07.001

20. H. Danso, D.B. Martinson, M. Ali, J.B. Williams, Physical, mechanical and durability properties of soil building blocks reinforced with natural fibres, Constr Build Mater 101 (2015) 797–809. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.069

21. J. Khedari, P. Watsanasathaporn, J. Hirunlabh, Development of fibre-based soil–cement block with low thermal conductivity, Cem Concr Compos 27 (2005) 111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.042

22. M. Ouedraogo, K. Dao, Y. Millogo, J.-E. Aubert, A. Messan, M. Seynou, L. Zerbo, M. Gomina, Physical, thermal and mechanical properties of adobes stabilized with fonio (Digitaria exilis) straw, Journal of Building Engineering 23 (2019) 250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.005

23. Y. Millogo, J.-C. Morel, J.-E. Aubert, K. Ghavami, Experimental analysis of Pressed Adobe Blocks reinforced with Hibiscus cannabinus fibers, Constr Build Mater 52 (2014) 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.094

24. NF EN ISO 17892-4, Reconnaissance et essais géotechniques — Essais de laboratoire sur les sols — Partie 4 : Détermination de la distribution granulométrie des particules, (2018).

25. NF EN 17892-12, Reconnaissance et essais géotechniques - Essais de laboratoire sur les sols - Partie 12 : détermination des limites de liquidité et de plasticité, (2018).

26. NF EN 17542-3, Terrassements - Essais géotechniques en laboratoire - Partie 3 : Valeur de bleu de méthylène VBS d’un sol ou d’une roche, (2022).

27. A. Sofiane, A. Laurent, Les bétons de granulats d’origine végétale: Application au béton de chanvre, Lavoisier, 2013.

28. A. Komuraiah, N.S. Kumar, B.D. Prasad, Chemical Composition of Natural Fibers and its Influence on their Mechanical Properties, Mechanics of Composite Materials 50 (2014) 359–376. doi: 10.1007/s11029-014-9422-2

29. O. Faruk, A.K. Bledzki, H.-P. Fink, M. Sain, Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010, Prog Polym Sci 37 (2012) 1552–1596. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003

30. J. Gressel, A. Zilberstein, Let them eat (GM) straw, Trends Biotechnol 21 (2003) 525–530. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.007

31. N. Reddy, Y. Yang, Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications, Trends Biotechnol 23 (2005) 22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002

32. A. Karimah, M.R. Ridho, S.S. Munawar, D.S. Adi, Ismadi, R. Damayanti, B. Subiyanto, W. Fatriasari, A. Fudholi, A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 13 (2021) 2442–2458. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014

33. R.C. Sun, J. Tomkinson, Characterization of hemicelluloses obtained by classical and ultrasonically assisted extractions from wheat straw, Carbohydr Polym 50 (2002) 263–271. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00037-1

34. V.K. Balla, K.H. Kate, J. Satyavolu, P. Singh, J.G.D. Tadimeti, Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects, Compos B Eng 174 (2019) 106956. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956

35. L. Avérous, F. Le Digabel, Properties of biocomposites based on lignocellulosic fillers, Carbohydr Polym 66 (2006) 480–493. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.004

36. A. Alemdar, M. Sain, Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibers: Morphology, thermal and mechanical properties, Compos Sci Technol 68 (2008) 557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.044

37. A. Demirbaş, Relationships between lignin contents and fixed carbon contents of biomass samples, Energy Convers Manag 44 (2003) 1481–1486. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00168-1

38. D.P. Ho, H.H. Ngo, W. Guo, A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel, Bioresour Technol 169 (2014) 742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.022

39. R.W. Gonzalez, H. Jameel, H. Chang, T. Treasure, A. Pirraglia, D. Saloni, Thermo-mechanical pulping as a pretreatment for agricultural biomass for biochemical conversion, Bioresources 6 (2011) 1599–1614.

40. S. Amaducci, M.T. Amaducci, R. Benati, G. Venturi, Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy, Ind Crops Prod 11 (2000) 179–186. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00063-1

41. L.T.T. Vo, J. Girones, C. Beloli, L. Chupin, E. Di Giuseppe, A.C. Vidal, A. Soutiras, D. Pot, D. Bastianelli, L. Bonnal, P. Navard, Processing and properties of sorghum stem fragment-polyethylene composites, Ind Crops Prod 107 (2017) 386–398. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.047

42. D.Y. Corredor, J.M. Salazar, K.L. Hohn, S. Bean, B. Bean, D. Wang, Evaluation and Characterization of Forage Sorghum as Feedstock for Fermentable Sugar Production, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 158 (2009) 164–179. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8340-y

43. S. Boubekeur, V. Rigassi, A. Mesbah, J.C. Morel, H. Houben, W. Caras, S. Dugelay, A. Douline, Z. El Gharbi, T. Joffroy, O. Moles, S. Moriset, Compressed earth blocks: testing procedures, Bruxelles, 2000.

44. XP NF P13-901, Blocs de terre comprimée pour murs et cloisons: définitions-Spécifications-Méthodes d’essais-Conditions de réception, (2011).

45. T. Abdel-Magid, P. Walker, K. Paine, S. Allen, Analysis of Sorghum Stalks and Fibres for Use in the Production of Low-Cost Housing Materials, Materials Circular Economy 3 (2021) 19. doi: 10.1007/s42824-021-00029-z

46. B. Bakeer, I. Taha, H. El-Mously, S.A. Shehata, On the characterisation of structure and properties of sorghum stalks, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 4 (2013) 265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2012.08.001

47. C. Babé, D.K. Kidmo, A. Tom, R.R.N. Mvondo, R.B.E. Boum, N. Djongyang, Thermomechanical characterization and durability of adobes reinforced with millet waste fibers (sorghum bicolor), Case Studies in Construction Materials 13 (2020) e00422. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00422

48. P.M. Touré, V. Sambou, M. Faye, A. Thiam, M. Adj, D. Azilinon, Mechanical and hygrothermal properties of compressed stabilized earth bricks (CSEB), Journal of Building Engineering 13 (2017) 266–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.08.012

49. H. Cagnon, J.E. Aubert, M. Coutand, C. Magniont, Hygrothermal properties of earth bricks, Energy Build 80 (2014) 208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.024

50. F. Hadji, N. Ihaddadene, R. Ihaddadene, A. Betga, A. Charick, P.O. Logerais, Thermal conductivity of two kinds of earthen building materials formerly used in Algeria, Journal of Building Engineering 32 (2020) 101823. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101823

51. S. Liuzzi, M.R. Hall, P. Stefanizzi, S.P. Casey, Hygrothermal behaviour and relative humidity buffering of unfired and hydrated lime-stabilised clay composites in a Mediterranean climate, Build Environ 61 (2013) 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.12.006

52. E.W. Smith’, G.S. Austin, New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Adobe, pressed-earth, and rammed-earth industries in New Mexico (revised edition), 1996.

53. P. Walker, Standards Australia International., The Australian earth building handbook, Standards Australia International, 2000.

54. H. Houben, V. Rigassi, P. Garnier, Compressed earth blocks: production equipment, 1994.

55. NZS 4298, Materials and Workmanship for Earth Buildings, Standard New Zealand (1998).