Title:
Combined Effect of Polycarboxylate Ether and Phosphonated Superplasticizers in Limestone Calcined Clay Cement
Author(s):
Sirajuddin Moghul, Sruthi Sreeram, Shengnan Sha, Franco Zunino, Robert J. Flatt
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
362
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
474-486
Keywords:
superplasticizers, limestone calcined clay cement, phosphonated superplasticizers, polycarboxylate ether
DOI:
10.14359/51741004
Date:
6/14/2024
Abstract:
The use of sustainable construction materials, such as Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3), has gained prominence in reducing the carbon footprint of the construction industry. However, LC3's unique composition presents challenges in achieving optimal workability. This study investigates the combined effect of two potent superplasticizers, polycarboxylate ether (PCE) and phosphonated superplasticizers, to enhance LC3's rheological properties. Through flow spread and heat evolution experiments, this research evaluates the synergistic impact of their fluidizing and retarding effects on workability and hydration.
Our findings reveal that the combination of PCE and phosphonated superplasticizers in LC3 exhibit a remarkable improvement in the rheological properties with marginal retardation. The study's outcomes offer valuable insights into the effective utilization of superplasticizers, paving the way for improved LC3 performance and its wider adoption in the construction industry, ultimately contributing to reduced environmental impact.
Related References:
1. Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., et al. “Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2018, pp. 49–56.
2. Scrivener, K. L. “Options for the future of cement,” 2014.
3. Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., and Gartner, E. M. “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2018, pp. 2–26.
4. Huntzinger, D. N., and Eatmon, T. D. “A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 17, No. 7, 2009, pp. 668–75.
5. Sánchez Berriel, S., Favier, A., Rosa Domínguez, E., et al. “Assessing the environmental and economic potential of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement in Cuba,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 124, 2016, pp. 361–9.
6. Sharma, M., Bishnoi, S., Martirena, F., et al. “Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: A state-of-the-art review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 149, 2021, p. 106564.
7. Cancio Díaz, Y., Sánchez Berriel, S., Heierli, U., et al. “Limestone calcined clay cement as a low-carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies,” Development Engineering, V. 2, 2017, pp. 82–91.
8. Muzenda, T. R., Hou, P., Kawashima, S., et al. “The role of limestone and calcined clay on the rheological properties of LC3,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 107, 2020, p. 103516.
9. Nair, N., Mohammed Haneefa, K., Santhanam, M., et al. “A study on fresh properties of limestone calcined clay blended cementitious systems,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 254, 2020, p. 119326.
10. Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., He, S., et al. “Rheology control of limestone calcined clay cement pastes by modifying the content of fine-grained metakaolin,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 12, No. 9, 2023, pp. 1126–40.
11. Gebbard, L., Feneuil, B., Palacios, M., et al. “Rheology of Limestone Calcined Clays Cement Pastes. A Comparative Approach with Pure Portland Cement Pastes.” In: Scrivener, K., Favier, A., eds. Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, vol. 10. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2015. pp. 595–595.
12. Nkinamubanzi, P.-C., Mantellato, S., and Flatt, R. J. “Superplasticizers in practice.” Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016. pp. 353–77.
13. Aïtcin, P. C., and Baalbaki, M. “Concrete admixtures—key components of modern concrete,” Concrete Technology: New trends, Industrial applications, 1994, pp. 33–47.
14. Flatt, R., and Schober, I. “Superplasticizers and the rheology of concrete.” Understanding the Rheology of Concrete. Elsevier, 2012. pp. 144–208.
15. Gelardi, G., Mantellato, S., Marchon, D., et al. “Chemistry of chemical admixtures.” Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016. pp. 149–218.
16. Flatt, R. J. “Towards a prediction of superplasticized concrete rheology,” n.d.
17. Akhlaghi, O., Aytas, T., Tatli, B., et al. “Modified poly(carboxylate ether)-based superplasticizer for enhanced flowability of calcined clay-limestone-gypsum blended Portland cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 101, 2017, pp. 114–22.
18. Schmid, M., Beuntner, N., Thienel, K.-Ch., et al. “Colloid-Chemical Investigation of the Interaction Between PCE Superplasticizers and a Calcined Mixed Layer Clay.” In: Martirena, F., Favier, A., Scrivener, K., eds. Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, vol. 16. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2018. pp. 434–9.
19. Lei, L., and Plank, J. “A concept for a polycarboxylate superplasticizer possessing enhanced clay tolerance,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1299–306.
20. Lei, L., and Plank, J. “A study on the impact of different clay minerals on the dispersing force of conventional and modified vinyl ether based polycarboxylate superplasticizers,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 60, 2014, pp. 1–10.
21. Bhattacherjee, S., Jain, S., and Santhanam, M. “A method to increase the workability retention of concrete with limestone calcined clay based cementitious system using a dispersing agent containing sodium hexametaphosphate,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 132, 2022, p. 104624.
22. Mosquet, M., Chevalier, Y., Brunel, S., et al. “Polyoxyethylene di-phosphonates as efficient dispersing polymers for aqueous suspensions,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, V. 65, No. 12, 1997, pp. 2545–55.
23. Guicquero, J.-P., Mosquet, M., Chevalier, Y., et al. “Thinners for aqueous suspensions of mineral particles and hydraulic binder pastes,” Google Patents, 1999.
24. Mosquet, M., Maitrasse, P., Guicquero, J. P., et al. “Ethoxylated di-phosphonate: An extreme molecule for extreme applications,” ref, V. 3, 2003, pp. 161–76.
25. Aïtcin, P.-C., and Flatt, R. J. “Science and technology of concrete admixtures,” Amsterdam, Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier, 2016.
26. Mantellato, S., Palacios, M., and Flatt, R. J. “Relating early hydration, specific surface and flow loss of cement pastes,” Materials and Structures, V. 52, No. 1, 2019, p. 5.
27. Mantellato, S., and Flatt, R. J. “Shifting factor—A new paradigm for studying the rheology of cementitious suspensions,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 103, No. 6, 2020, pp. 3562–74.
28. Kroger, M., Editor Applied Rheology., and editors@appliedrheology. org. “Extension of spread-slump formulae for yield stress evaluation,” 2013.
29. Chen, Y., Chaves Figueiredo, S., Li, Z., et al. “Improving printability of limestonecalcined clay-based cementitious materials by using viscosity-modifying admixture,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 132, 2020, p. 106040.
30. Sposito, R., Schmid, M., Beuntner, N., et al. “Early hydration behavior of blended cementitious systems containing calcined clays and superplasticizer,” 2019.
31. Ramachandran, V. S., Lowery, M. S., Wise, T., et al. “The role of phosphonates in the hydration of Portland cement,” Materials and Structures, V. 26, No. 7, 1993, pp. 425–32.
32. Qi, S., Wang, T., Fan, S., et al. “Dispersion, adsorption and retardation effects of phosphonated small molecule superplasticisers in cement hydration,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 31, No. 9, 2019, pp. 399–410.
33. Gu, P., and Ramachandran, V. S. “Electrochemical Behavior of Portland Cement Pastes Containing Phosphonates,” n.d.