Title:
Assessing Fly Ash Beneficiation's Process Effect on Concrete Performance
Author(s):
Rennan Medeiros and Leandro. F. M. Sanchez
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
362
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
432-443
Keywords:
fly ash concrete, different fly ashes, hydration, mechanical properties, global warming potential
DOI:
10.14359/51740901
Date:
6/11/2024
Abstract:
Achieving low carbon emissions in the concrete industry necessitates a multifaceted approach, which includes maximizing the efficacy of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). In this respect, this paper investigates fly ash-concrete made of fly ash from distinct burning technology, benefited by different pieces of equipment. Several aspects of fly ash-concrete performance were assessed, including hydration, mechanical properties, and eco-efficiency. The results showed that the burning technology plays an important role in fly ash reactivity. Although both approaches to mechanically activating fly ashes provide interesting results, there is an intriguing difference in the performance of the fly ash concrete. Furthermore, the lifecycle analysis underscores the potential for considerable reduction in global warming potential through the incorporation of fly ash in concrete, making it a promising avenue for reducing the industry's environmental footprint. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing fly ash utilization and advancing the sustainability of the concrete sector.
Related References:
1. M.B. Ali, R. Saidur, M.S. Hossain, A review on emission analysis in cement industries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (2011) 2252–2261. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014
2. LafargeHolcim, Integrated Annual Report 2020, https://www.holcim.com/sites/holcim/files/2022-04/26022021-finance-lafageholcim_f
y_2020_report-full-en.pdf, 2021, 2021.
3. B. Lothenbach, K. Scrivener, R.D. Hooton, Supplementary cementitious materials, Cem Concr Res. 41 (2011) 1244–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001
4. R. Snellings, P. Suraneni, J. Skibsted, Future and emerging supplementary cementitious materials, Cem Concr Res. 171 (2023) 107199. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107199
5. International energy agency, The world’s coal consumption is set to reach a new high in 2022 as the energy crisis shakes markets, (2022).
6. K.L. Scrivener, V.M. John, E.M. Gartner, Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry, Cem Concr Res. 114 (2018) 2–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015
7. Z.T. Yao, X.S. Ji, P.K. Sarker, J.H. Tang, L.Q. Ge, M.S. Xia, Y.Q. Xi, A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash, Earth-Science Reviews. 141 (2015) 105–121. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.016
8. T. Hemalatha, A. Ramaswamy, A review on fly ash characteristics – Towards promoting high volume utilization in developing sustainable concrete, J Clean Prod. 147 (2017) 546–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.114
9. X.-Y. Wang, K.-B. Park, Analysis of compressive strength development of concrete containing high volume fly ash, Constr Build Mater. 98 (2015) 810–819. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.099
10. G. Habert, N. Roussel, Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives, Cem Concr Compos. 31 (2009) 397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001
11. ASTM-International, ASTM C150/150M Standard Specification for Portland Cement, 2021.
12. ASTM-International, ASTM C39–18Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concreteSpecimens, 2018.
13. ASTM-International, ASTM C469/C469M Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression, 2014.
14. A. Petek Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, A. Stadel, Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review, Cem Concr Compos. 51 (2014) 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005
15. P.R. de Matos, M. Foiato, L.R. Prudêncio, Ecological, fresh state and long-term mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash high-performance self-compacting concrete, Constr Build Mater. 203 (2019) 282–293. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.074
16. L.N. Assi, E. Eddie Deaver, P. Ziehl, Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly Ash-Based geopolymer concrete, Constr Build Mater. 167 (2018) 372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.193
17. C.-H. Huang, S.-K. Lin, C.-S. Chang, H.-J. Chen, Mix proportions and mechanical properties of concrete containing very high-volume of Class F fly ash, Constr Build Mater. 46 (2013) 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.016.
18. R. Kurad, J.D. Silvestre, J. de Brito, H. Ahmed, Effect of incorporation of high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash on the strength and global warming potential of concrete, J Clean Prod. 166 (2017) 485–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.236
19. A.M. Rashad, An exploratory study on high-volume fly ash concrete incorporating silica fume subjected to thermal loads, J Clean Prod. 87 (2015) 735–744. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.018
20. N. Kabay, M.M. Tufekci, A.B. Kizilkanat, D. Oktay, Properties of concrete with pumice powder and fly ash as cement replacement materials, Constr Build Mater. 85 (2015) 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.026