Title:
Effect of Weathering Exposure Time on the Flexural Behavior of FRP Strengthened RC Beams
Author(s):
Haitham A. Ibrahim, Mohamed F. M. Fahmy, and Seyed Saman Khedmatgozar Dolati
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
771-790
Keywords:
Reinforced concrete beam, FRP, intermediate crack debonding, finite elements, deterioration, bond strength
DOI:
10.14359/51740662
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
This study numerically investigates the long-term effectiveness of using externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates as a strengthening technique for reinforced concrete (RC) beams. A two-dimensional finite element model (FEM) that can accurately predict the flexural behavior of FRP strengthened RC beams, is developed. Weathering exposure time of 0.0, 15.5, 35, and 75 years were considered. In total, 28 different concrete beams were modelled using the developed FEM. The results show that prolonged exposure to natural weathering can cause premature FRP debonding, even before reaching the yielding load. The ultimate load capacity, midspan deflection, and ductility of strengthened RC beams can be reduced by up to 38%, 62%, and 100%, respectively. In addition, the findings raised concerns about the applicability of the ACI 440.2R-17 provisions for calculating the design flexural strength of FRP strengthened RC beams with prolonged exposure to natural weathering. To ensure a safe design for strengthened beams with FRP debonding or concrete crushing failure modes, this paper recommends an additional reduction factor ranging from 0.8 to 0.9. Furthermore, periodic inspection using non-destructive testing and FRP anchorage system are highly recommended for both existing and new applications of FRP in structures.
Related References:
1. Ortiz JD, Khedmatgozar Dolati SS, Malla P, Nanni A, Mehrabi A. 2023. FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Concrete: State-of-the-Art Review on Durability and Mechanical Effects. Materials.16:1990.
2. Dolan CW, Tanner J, Mukai D, Hamilton H, Douglas E. 2008. Design guidelines for durability of bonded CFRP repair/strengthening of concrete beams. NCHRP Report.155.
3. Siavashi S, Eamon CD, Makkawy AA, Wu H-C. 2019. Long-Term Durability of FRP Bond in the Midwest United States for Externally Strengthened Bridge Components. Journal of Composites for Construction.23:05019001.
4. Nuaimi NA, Sohail MG, Hawileh R, Abdalla JA, Douier K. 2021. Durability of Reinforced Concrete Beams Externally Strengthened with CFRP Laminates under Harsh Climatic Conditions. Journal of Composites for Construction.25:04021005.
5. Dassault S. 2014. ABAQUS 6.14 analysis User’s Manual. Dassault Systems: Providence, RI, USA.
6. Carreira DJ, Chu K-H. 1985. Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression. ACI Structural Journal.82:797-804.
7. Lu XZ, Teng JG, Ye LP, Jiang JJ. 2005. Bond–slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete. Engineering Structures.27:920-37.
8. Daud RA, Cunningham LS, Wang YC. 2015. Static and fatigue behaviour of the bond interface between concrete and externally bonded CFRP in single shear. Engineering Structures.97:54-67.
9. Brena SF, Bramblett RM, Wood SL, Kreger ME. 2003. Increasing flexural capacity of reinforced concrete beams using carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Structural Journal.100:36-46.
10. Rahimi H, Hutchinson A. 2001. Concrete beams strengthened with externally bonded FRP plates. Journal of Composites for Construction.5:44-56.
11. Maalej M, Leong K. 2005. Effect of beam size and FRP thickness on interfacial shear stress concentration and failure mode of FRP-strengthened beams. Composites Science and Technology.65:1148-58.
12. ACI Committee. 2017. 440.2R-17 Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures. Amarican Concrete Institute: Indianapolis, IN, USA.
13. Dolati SSK, Malla P, Ortiz JD, Mehrabi A, Nanni A. 2023. Identifying NDT methods for damage detection in concrete elements reinforced or strengthened with FRP. Engineering Structures.287:116155.
14. AASHTO. 2019. Manual for bridge element inspection. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
15. Zhang H, Smith ST, Gravina RJ, Wang Z. 2017. Modelling of FRP-concrete bonded interfaces containing FRP anchors. Construction and Building Materials.139:394-402.
16. Kalfat R, Al-Mahaidi R. 2016. Improvement of FRP-to-concrete bond performance using bidirectional fiber patch anchors combined with FRP spike anchors. Composite Structures.155:89-98.
17. Muciaccia G, Khorasani M, Mostofinejad D. 2022. Effect of different parameters on the performance of FRP anchors in combination with EBR-FRP strengthening systems: A review. Construction and Building Materials.354:129181.
18. Carozzi FG, Colombi P, Fava G, Poggi C. 2018. Mechanical and bond properties of FRP anchor spikes in concrete and masonry blocks. Composite Structures.183:185-98.
19. Sun W, Liu S, Zhang C. 2020. An effective improvement for enhancing the strength and feasibility of FRP spike anchors. Composite Structures.247:112449.