Title:
Fatigue Performance of Real-Scale Precast GFRP Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Arches
Author(s):
Bartosz Piątek and Tomasz Siwowski
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
729-743
Keywords:
fatigue, lightweight concrete, GFRP reinforcement, concrete arch, bridge
DOI:
10.14359/51740659
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
Due to a dynamic development of infrastructure, engineers around the world are looking for new materials and structural solutions, which could be more durable, cheaper in the life cycle management, and built quickly. One of prospective solutions for building small-span bridges can be precast lightweight concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars. Thanks to prefabrication, it is possible to shorten the construction time. Using lightweight concrete affects structure weight as well as transportation costs. GFRP rebars can make the structure more durable and also cheaper in terms of life cycle management costs. The paper focuses on the fatigue performance of a real-scale arch (10.0 m (33 ft) long, 1.0 m (3.3 ft) wide, and 2.4 m (7.9 ft) high) made of lightweight concrete and GFRP rebars (LWC/GFRP) in comparison with an arch made of normal weight concrete and typical steel reinforcement (NWC/steel). The fatigue loads ranging from 12 to 120 kN (2.7 to 27 kip) were applied in a sinusoidal variable manner with a frequency of 1.5 Hz. This research revealed that the NWC/steel arch exhibited significantly better fatigue resistance when compared to the LWC/GFRP arch. Differences in the behavior of the NWC/steel and LWC/GFRP models under fatigue load were visible from the beginning of the research. The LWC/GFRP model was exposed to fatigue loads, resulting in gradual deterioration at an early stage. This degradation was evident through stiffness being progressively reduced, leading to increased displacements and strains as the number of load cycles increased. The model did not withstand the fatigue load and was destroyed after approximately 390 thousand load cycles, in contrast to the NWC/steel model, which withstood all 2 million load cycles without significant damages or the stiffness being decreased. However, the prefabricated lightweight concrete arches with composite reinforcement seem to be an interesting alternative of load-bearing elements in infrastructure construction.
Related References:
1. Madireddy, H., Naganathan, S., & Mahalingam, B. (2022). A Review on Precast Concrete Construction. Sustainable Practices and Innovations in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of SPICE 2021, 77-113.
2. Hieber, D. G., Wacker, J. M., Eberhard, M. O., & Stanton, J. F. (2005). State-of-the-art report on precast concrete systems for rapid construction of bridges.
3. Gordon, S. R., & May, I. M. (2007, March). Precast deck systems for steel-concrete composite bridges. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering (Vol. 160, No. 1, pp. 25-35). Thomas Telford Ltd.
4. Hamze, Y. (2014). Concrete durability in harsh environmental conditions exposed to freeze thaw cycles. Physics Procedia, 55, 265-270.
5. Schläfli, M., & Brühwiler, E. (1998). Fatigue of existing reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs. Engineering structures, 20(11), 991-998.
6. Cusson, D., Lounis, Z., & Daigle, L. (2011). Durability monitoring for improved service life predictions of concrete bridge decks in corrosive environments. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(7), 524-541.
7. Issa, M. A., Alhassan, M. A., & Shabila, H. I. (2007). Low-cycle fatigue testing of high-performance concrete bonded overlay–bridge deck slab systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(4), 419-428.
8. Luo, S., Bai, T., Guo, M., Wei, Y., & Ma, W. (2022). Impact of Freeze–Thaw Cycles on the Long-Term Performance of Concrete Pavement and Related Improvement Measures: A Review. Materials, 15(13), 4568.
9. EN 1990. Eurocode: Basis of structural design. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization, 2002.
10. Broomfield, J. P. (2023). Corrosion of steel in concrete: understanding, investigation and repair. Crc Press.
11. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
12. Nanni, A. (2000). FRP reinforcement for bridge structures. In Proceedings, Structural Engineering Conference, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS (Vol. 5).
13. Qureshi, J. (2023). A Review of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Bridges. Fibers, 11(5), 40.
14. Gudonis, E., Timinskas, E., Gribniak, V., Kaklauskas, G., Arnautov, A. K., & Tamulėnas, V. (2013). FRP reinforcement for concrete structures: state-of-the-art review of application and design. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 5(4), 147-158.
15. Nanni, A., De Luca, A., & Zadeh, H. J. (2014). Reinforced concrete with FRP bars: Mechanics and design. CRC press.
16. Zoghi, M. (Ed.). (2013). The international handbook of FRP composites in civil engineering. Crc Press.
17. Mallick, P. K. (2007). Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design. CRC press.
18. Ortiz, J. D., Khedmatgozar Dolati, S. S., Malla, P., Nanni, A., & Mehrabi, A. (2023). FRPReinforced/Strengthened Concrete: State-of-the-Art Review on Durability and Mechanical Effects. Materials, 16(5), 1990.
19. ACI CODE-440.11-22: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars—Code and Commentary.
20. Thienel, K. C., Haller, T., & Beuntner, N. (2020). Lightweight concrete—From basics to innovations. Materials, 13(5), 1120.
21. ACI 213R-03: Guide for Structural Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete.
22. Mohammed, J. H., & Hamad, A. J. (2014). Materials, properties and application review of Lightweight concrete. Technical Review of the Faculty of Engineering University of Zulia, 37(2), 10-15.
23. Raithby, K. D., & Lydon, F. D. (1981). A Review of the International Use of Lightweight Concrete in Highway Bridges (No. Tech Rpt. 20 Monograph).
24. Waldron, C. J., Cousins, T. E., Nassar, A. J., & Gomez, J. P. (2005). Demonstration of use of highperformance lightweight concrete in bridge superstructure in Virginia. Journal of performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(2), 146-154.
25. Wiater, A., & Siwowski, T. (2017). Lightweight concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with GFRP composite bars. Roads and Bridges-Drogi i Mosty, 16(4), 279-293.
26. Wiater, A., & Siwowski, T. (2020). Serviceability and ultimate behaviour of GFRP reinforced lightweight concrete slabs: Experimental test versus code prediction. Composite Structures, 239, 112020.
27. Wiater, A., Piątek, B., & Siwowski, T. (2020). Research on bridge elements made of lightweight concrete reinforced with GFRP rebars. Proceeding of IABSE Symposium “Synergy of Culture and Civil Engineering – History and Challenges”, Wrocław, 7-9 October 2020.
28. EN 206-1:2014. Concrete - Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity.
29. EN 13791:2019. Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete components.
30. ISO 10406-1:2015. Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement of concrete — Test methods — Part 1: FRP bars and grids.
31. PN-85/S-10030. Bridges. Loads (in Polish).
32. PN-91/S-10042. Design of concrete bridges (in Polish).
33. CSA S806-12. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers.