Title:
A Comparative Analysis of GFRP- and Steel-RC Columns under Combined Shear, Flexure, and Torsion Loads
Author(s):
Yasser M. Selmy and Ehab F. El-Salakawy
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
442-461
Keywords:
Circular columns, GFRP reinforcement, ductility, deformability, torsion-to-bending moment, seismic behavior, combined cyclic loading.
DOI:
10.14359/51740642
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
The seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge columns subjected to multidirectional ground motions is a critical issue, as these columns can experience axial compression, bending, and torsional loading. Moreover, steel corrosion is a significant concern in existing bridges, leading to deficiencies in steel-RC structural members. The use of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement has been established as a practical and effective solution to mitigate the corrosion-related issues associated with traditional steel reinforcement in concrete structures. However, the dissimilar mechanical properties of GFRP and steel have raised apprehensions regarding its feasibility in seismic-resistant structures. The current study involves conducting an experimental investigation to assess the feasibility of utilizing GFRP reinforcement as a substitute for conventional steel reinforcement in circular RC bridge columns subjected to cyclic lateral loading, which induces shear, bending, and torsion. One column was reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups, while the other column, served as a control and was reinforced with conventional steel reinforcement. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the lateral displacement deformability and energy dissipation characteristics of the GFRP-RC column. The results showed that GFRP-RC column exhibited stable post-peak behavior and high levels of deformability under the applied combined loading. Additionally, with a torsion-to-bending moment ratio of 0.2, both columns reached similar lateral load and torsional moment capacities and were able to attain lateral-drift capacities exceeding the minimum requirements of North American design codes and guidelines.
Related References:
1. Prakash, S. S., Li, Q., and Belarbi, A. “Behavior of Circular and Square Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns under Combined Loading Including Torsion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 3, 2012, pp. 317–327.
2. Belarbi, A., Ayoub, A., Greene, G., et al. “Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Subjected to Combined Loading Including Torsion,” Structural Engineering Research Frontiers, No. October, 2007, pp. 1–16.
3. Prakash, S., Belarbi, A., and You, Y. M. “Seismic Performance of Circular RC Columns Subjected to Axial Force, Bending, and Torsion with Low and Moderate Shear,” Engineering Structures, V. 32, No. 1, 2010, pp. 46–59.
4. Tirasit, P., and Kawashima, K. “Seismic Performance of Square Reinforced Concrete Columns under Combined Cyclic Flexural and Torsional Loadings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, V. 11, No. 3, 2007, pp. 425–452.
5. Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K. “Seismic response study of the US 101/Painter Street Overpass using strong motion records.” SMIP94 Seminar on Seismological and Engineering Implications of Recent Strong-Motion Data. 1994. p. 14.
6. Meng, J. Y., and Lui, E. M. “Torsional effects on short-span highway bridges,” Computers and Structures, V. 75, No. 6, 2000, pp. 619–29.
7. Hurtado, G. “Effect of Torsion on the Flexural Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” Ph.D Thesis , Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2009.
8. Nelson, R. B., Saiidi, M. S., and Zadeh, S. “Experimental evaluation of performance of conventional bridge systems,” CCEER Rep. No. 07- 04, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV., 2007.
9. Johnson, N., Saiid Saiidi, M., and Sanders, D. “System versus component response of a two-span reinforced concrete bridge system,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, V. 7, No. 2, 2009, pp. 503–517.
10. Otsuka, H., Takeshita, E., Yabuki, W., et al. “Study on the Seismic Performance Of Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Torsional Moment , Bending Moment and Axial Force,” Proceedings of the13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004, Paper No. 393.
11. Hsu, H. L., and Wang, C. L. “Flexural-Torsional Behaviour of Steel Reinforced Concrete Members Subjected to Repeated Loading,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, V. 29, No. 5, 2000, pp. 667–682.
12. Tirasit, P., Kawashima, K., and Watanabe, G. “An Experimental Study on the Performance of RC Columns Subjected to Cyclic Flexural-Torsional Loading.” Second International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering. 2005. pp. 357–364.
13. Belarbi, A., Prakash, S., and You, Y. M. “Effect of Spiral Reinforcement on Flexural-Shear-Torsional Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Circular Bridge Columns,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, V. 33, No. 2, 2009, pp. 137–158.
14. Li, Q., and Belarbi, A. “Seismic Behavior of RC Columns with Interlocking Spirals Under Combined Loadings Including Torsion,” The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, V. 14, No. 7, 2011, pp. 1281–1291.
15. ACI. “Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars, ACI 440.1R-15,” American Concrete Institute (ACI), Detroit, V. MI, 2015, p. 88.
16. Tavassoli, A., Liu, J., and Sheikh, S. A. “Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Circular Columns under Simulated Seismic Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 1, 2015, pp. 103–114.
17. Naqvi, S., Mahmoud, K., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Effect of Axial Load and Steel Fibers on the Seismic Behavior of Lap-Spliced Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 134, 2017, pp. 376–389.
18. Kharal, Z., and Sheikh, S. A. “Seismic Behavior of Square and Circular Concrete Columns with GFRP Reinforcement,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 24, No. 1, 2020, 04019059.
19. Abdallah, A. E., Selmy, Y. M., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Confinement Characteristics of GFRP-RC Circular Columns under Simulated Earthquake Loading: A Numerical Study,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 26, No. 2, 2022, 4022007.
20. Selmy, Y. M., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Numerical Investigation on the Seismic Behaviour of GFRPReinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 262, 2022, 114355.
21. Selmy, Y. M., Abdallah, A. E., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of GFRP-RC Circular Columns Subjected to Simulated Earthquake Loading.” Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference. Springer, 2022. pp. 623–633.
22. NRCC. “National Building Code of Canada,” National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2020, p. 1530.
23. CSA. “Design and Construction of Building Structures with Fibre-Reinforced Polymers, CSA S806-12 (R2021),” Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021, p. 208.
24. Sharbatdar, M. K., and Saatcioglu, M. “Seismic Design of FRP Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, V. 2, No. 3, 2009, pp. 211–222.
25. Ali, M., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Seismic Performance of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 20, No. 3, 2016, 04015074.
26. Mohamed, K., Farghaly, A. S., and Benmokrane, B. “Strut efficiency-based design for concrete deep beams reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 4, 2016, pp. 791–800.
27. Caltrans. “Seismic Design Criteria (SDC),” version 2. Bridge Design Specifications, State of California, Department of Transportation Sacramento, CA, 2019.
28. CSA. “Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, CSA S6-19,” Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019, p. 1092.
29. CSA. “Design of Concrete Structures (CSA A23.3-19),” Canadian standards association, Toronto, ON, V. Canada, 2019, p. 295.
30. Abdallah, A. E., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Confinement Properties of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Circular Columns under Simulated Seismic Loading,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 25, No. 2, 2021, 04020088.
31. Tavassoli, A., and Sheikh, S. A. “Seismic Resistance of Circular Columns Reinforced with Steel and GFRP,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 21, No. 4, 2017, 04017002.
32. CSA. “Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practices for concrete, CSA A23.1-19/A23.2-19,” Canadian standards association, Toronto, ON, 2019.
33. CSA. “Carbon steel bars for concrete reinforcement (CSA G30.18-09) (R2019),” Canadian standards association, Toronto, ON, 2009, p. 14.
34. CSA. “National Standard of Canada Specification for fibre-reinforced, CSA S807,” Canadian standards association, Toronto, ON, 2019, p. 67.
35. Abdallah, A. E., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Seismic Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Circular Columns Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 5, 2021, pp. 221–234.
36. ACI. “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary, ACI 374.1-05 (R2019),” American Concrete Institute (ACI), Detroit, 2019, p. 9.
37. Sheikh, S. A., and Khoury, S. S. “Confined concrete columns with stubs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No. 44, 1993, pp. 414–431.
38. Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. “Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges,” John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
39. Hose, Y. D., and Seible, F. “Performance Evaluation Database for Concrete Bridge Components and Systems under Simulated Seismic Loads,” PEER Report 1999/11, Pacific Earthquake Research Center, College of Engineering University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
40. Xu, D., Yang, Y., and Chen, Z. “Experimental study and damage model on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete l-shaped columns under combined torsion,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), V. 10, No. 19, 2020, pp. 1–18.
41. Khajeh Hesameddin, P., Irfanoglu, A., and Hacker, T. J. “Effective viscous damping ratio in seismic response of reinforced concrete structures,” International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, No. 1979, 2015.
42. Hasaballa, M., and El-Salakawy, E. F. “Shear Capacity of Exterior Beam-Column Joints Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Stirrups,” ASCE, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 20, No. 2, 2016, 04015047.
43. Ganganagoudar, A., Mondal, T. G., and Prakash, S. S. “Improved Softened Membrane Model for Reinforced Concrete Circular Bridge Columns under Torsional Loading,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, V. 21, No. 7, 2016, 04016037.