Title:
Model Uncertainty in Reliability Analysis of FRP-to-Concrete Bond with Grooves
Author(s):
Zhao Wang and Baolin Wan
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
360
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
80-95
Keywords:
FRP-to-concrete bond, grooves, reliability analysis, uncertainty of model factor, probability distribution function.
DOI:
10.14359/51740618
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
The use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for external bonding has become a popular and widely accepted technique for enhancing the strength of concrete structures due to its excellent mechanical performance, corrosion resistance, and ease of construction. However, premature debonding is a major challenge as it prevents the full capacity of FRP composites from being achieved, resulting in material waste. Recently, grooving the surface of concrete before bonding FRP has emerged as a potential solution to this problem. Several experimental studies have evaluated the bond strength of FRP-to-concrete joints with grooves. To facilitate the practical application of this technique, it is necessary to develop comprehensive reliability-based design guidelines that account for the uncertainty arising from various aspects such as materials, model errors, and loading. A critical factor of such analysis is the calibration of model uncertainty which significantly affects the accuracy of reliability-based design and analysis. The objective of this study was to measure the model uncertainty of the existing prediction model for FRP-to-concrete joint with a longitudinal groove by involving the model factor which is defined as the ratio of observed values from experimental test to calculated values from prediction models. To eliminate the potential correlation from critical parameters, the residual model factor was isolated from model factor by separating the systematic part. The lognormal distribution was found to be the most suitable distribution function to describe the residual model factor, and the mean and variance were determined. With this newfound knowledge, we are better equipped to account for uncertainties in the design and construction of FRP-to-concrete connections with grooves, which will ultimately result in more durable and reliable structural improvements.
Related References:
1. Teng JG, Chen JF. Mechanics of debonding in FRP-plated RC beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings. 2009;162(5):335-45.
2. Teng JG, Chen J, Smith ST, Lam L. FRP: strengthened RC structures. . 2002.
3. Lu XZ, Ye LP, Teng JG, Jiang JJ. Meso-scale finite element model for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete. Eng Struct. 2005;27(4):564-75.
4. Hollaway LC, Teng J. Strengthening and rehabilitation of civil infrastructures using fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Elsevier; 2008.
5. Cromwell JR, Harries KA, Shahrooz BM. Environmental durability of externally bonded FRP materials intended for repair of concrete structures. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(5):2528-39.
6. Wu Y, Jiang C. Quantification of bond-slip relationship for externally bonded FRP-to-concrete joints. J Composite Constr. 2013;17(5):673-86.
7. Wan B, Sutton MA, Petrou MF, Harries KA, Li N. Investigation of bond between fiber reinforced polymer and concrete undergoing global mixed mode I/II loading. J Eng Mech. 2004;130(12):1467-75.
8. Kezmane A, Boukais S, Hamizi M. Numerical simulation of squat reinforced concrete wall strengthened by FRP composite material. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2016;10(4):445-55.
9. Tajmir-Riahi A, Moshiri N, Mostofinejad D. Bond mechanism of EBROG method using a single groove to attach CFRP sheets on concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;197:693-704.
10. Hosseini A, Mostofinejad D. Effect of groove characteristics on CFRP-to-concrete bond behavior of EBROG joints: experimental study using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Constr Build Mater. 2013;49:364-73.
11. Moshiri N, Tajmir-Riahi A, Mostofinejad D, Czaderski C, Motavalli M. Experimental and analytical study on CFRP strips-to-concrete bonded joints using EBROG method. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019;158:437-47.
12. Hosseini A, Mostofinejad D. Experimental investigation into bond behavior of CFRP sheets attached to concrete using EBR and EBROG techniques. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2013;51:130-9.
13. Ghahsareh FM, Mostofinejad D. Groove classification in EBROG FRP-to-concrete joints. Constr Build Mater. 2021;275:122169.
14. Mostofinejad D, Mahmoudabadi E. Grooving as alternative method of surface preparation to postpone debonding of FRP laminates in concrete beams. J Composite Constr. 2010;14(6):804-11.
15. Mostofinejad D, Mofrad MH, Hosseini A, Mofrad HH. Investigating the effects of concrete compressive strength, CFRP thickness and groove depth on CFRP-concrete bond strength of EBROG joints. Constr Build Mater. 2018;189:323-37.
16. Wang Z, Wan B. Reliability of Externally Bonded FRP-to-Concrete Joints with Epoxy Interlocking Enhancement. J Composite Constr. 2023;27(2):04023014.
17. Wang Z, Wan B. Reliability Analysis of FRP-Concrete Joint with or Without Epoxy Interlocking Enhancement. 10th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of CICE 2020/2021 10; Springer; 2022.
18. Moghaddas A, Mostofinejad D. Empirical FRP-concrete bond strength model for externally bonded reinforcement on grooves. J Composite Constr. 2019;23(2):04018080.
19. Phoon K, Kulhawy FH. Characterisation of model uncertainties for laterally loaded rigid drilled shafts. Geotechnique. 2005;55(1):45-54.
20. JCSS J. Probabilistic model code. Joint Committee on Structural Safety. 2001;601.
21. Zhang D, Gu X, Yu Q, Huang H, Wan B, Jiang C. Fully probabilistic analysis of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints considering model uncertainty. Composite Structures. 2018;185:786-806.
22. Yu Q, Gu X, Zhao X, Zhang D, Huang H, Jiang C. Characterization of model uncertainty of adhesively bonded CFRP-to-steel joints. Composite Structures. 2019;215:150-65.
23. Maio C, Schexnayder C, Knutson K, Weber S. Probability distribution functions for construction simulation. J Constr Eng Manage. 2000;126(4):285-92.
24. Darren Graham L, Smith SD, Dunlop P. Lognormal distribution provides an optimum representation of the concrete delivery and placement process. J Constr Eng Manage. 2005;131(2):230-8.