Title:
Readily Implementable Sustainable Solutions for Pavement Concretes: Agency and Industry Perspective
Author(s):
Michelle A. Helsel, Milena Rangelov, Robert Spragg, Michael Praul
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
361
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
16-30
Keywords:
sustainability, embodied carbon, LCA, concrete pavements, environmental impacts, greenhouse gases, climate change
DOI:
10.14359/51740604
Date:
3/1/2024
Abstract:
To support a rapid integration of sustainability principles into paving concrete practice, this study provides a closer look into readily implementable cement and concrete decarbonization strategies. To do so, this study relies on combined stakeholder involvement, quantitative analysis using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and the state-of-the-practice in the US paving concrete industry to understand merits of each solution. The results indicate that concrete mix design optimization is a promising, yet not widely applied solution that can reduce costs, enhance durability, and provide average carbon emissions savings of 14 percent. Use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) is another solution with multiple benefits, however, the use of SCM is already widely implemented across the USA. Industry-wide improvement in cement carbon footprint due to energy efficiency can provide additional savings of up to 10 percent. Quantifying the environmental footprint of concrete is critical to inform decision-making and enable more sustainable outcomes.
Related References:
1. G. Habert et al., “Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries,” Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 559–573, 2020.
2. S. A. Miller, A. Horvath, and P. J. Monteiro, “Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 11, no. 7, p. 074029, 2016.
3. S. A. Miller, V. M. John, S. A. Pacca, and A. Horvath, “Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 114, pp. 115–124, 2018.
4. Z. Cao, E. Masanet, A. Tiwari, and S. Akolawala, “Decarbonizing Concrete: Deep decarbonization pathways for the cement and concrete cycle in the United States, India, and China,” Ind. Sustain. Anal. Lab-Clim. Found., 2021.
5. M. A. Helsel, M. Rangelov, L. Montanari, R. Spragg, and M. Carrion, “Contextualizing embodied carbon emissions of concrete using mixture design parameters and performance metrics,” Struct. Concr., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1766–1779, 2023.
6. M. Rangelov, H. Dylla, B. Dobling, J. Gudimettla, N. Sivaneswaran, and M. Praul, “Readily implementable strategies for reducing embodied environmental impacts of concrete pavements in the United States,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2676, no. 9, pp. 436–450, 2022.
7. D. Coffetti, E. Crotti, G. Gazzaniga, M. Carrara, T. Pastore, and L. Coppola, “Pathways towards sustainable concrete,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 154, p. 106718, 2022.
8. Portland Cement Association, “Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality,” 2021. Available at: https://www.cement.org/sustainability/roadmap-to-carbon-neutrality
9. M. Hanifa, R. Agarwal, U. Sharma, P. Thapliyal, and L. Singh, “A review on CO2 capture and sequestration in the construction industry: Emerging approaches and commercialised technologies,” J. CO2 Util., vol. 67, p. 102292, 2023.
10. B. Debnath and P. P. Sarkar, “Pervious concrete as an alternative pavement strategy: A state-of-the-art review,” Int. J. Pavement Eng., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1516–1531, 2020.
11. J. Nilimaa, “Smart materials and technologies for sustainable concrete construction,” Dev. Built Environ., p. 100177, 2023.
12. F. Farooq et al., “Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 306, p. 124762, 2021.
13. C. R. Rollakanti and C. V. S. R. Prasad, “Applications, performance, challenges and current progress of 3D concrete printing technologies as the future of sustainable construction–A state of the art review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 65, pp. 995–1000, 2022.
14. S. Debbarma and G. Ransinchung, “Achieving sustainability in roller compacted concrete pavement mixes using reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates–state of the art review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 287, p. 125078, 2021.
15. California Legislative Organization., “Buy Clean California Act 3500 - 3505. https://www.dgs.ca.gov/PD/Resources/Page-Content/Procurement-Division-Resources-List-Folder/Buy-Clean-California-Act.” 2017.
16. A. Mukherjee and L. Miller, “Minnesota DOT EPD pilot project: Development of a sustainable procurement roadmap,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Research & Innovation, 2019.
17. Colorado General Assembly., “Global Warming Potential for Public Project Materials; House Bill 21-1303. https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb21-1303.” 2021.
18. AASHTO., “Standard Practice for Developing Performance Engineered Concrete Pavement Mixtures.
AASHTO R 101. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.” 2022.
19. ISO 21930: 2017-Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works–Core rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services,” Geneva Switz. Int. Organ. Stand., 2017.
20. J. Silvestre, N. Silvestre, and J. De Brito, “Review on concrete nanotechnology,” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 455–485, 2016.
21. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)., “FHWA Infomaterials: Gateway to FHWA Infrastructure Materials Testing Data n.d. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/InfoMaterials (accessed July 29, 2021).”
22. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), “Life Cycle Inventory Database https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search.” 2012.
23. GreenDelta., “OpenLCA Software 1.8. 0 Available online: www.greendelta.com (accessed on August 30 2023). n.d.”
24. J. M. Gudimettla, G. L. Crawford, and J. Grove, “Optimizing paving mixtures for durable, cost-effective, and sustainable concrete,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2573, no. 1, pp. 115–124, 2016.
25. Portland Cement Association (PCA), “Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for portland cements (per ASTM C150, ASTM C1157, AASHTO M85 or CSA A3001).” 2016.
26. Portland Cement Association (PCA), “Environmental Product Declaration- Portland Cement (per ASTM C219 and specified in ASTM C150, ASTM C1157, AASHTO M 85, or CSA A3001).” 2020.