Geopolymer Flat Slabs with Synthetic Coarse Aggregate under Punching

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Geopolymer Flat Slabs with Synthetic Coarse Aggregate under Punching

Author(s): Eloisa Azevedo, Denio Oliveira, and Aaron Nzambi

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 121

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 161-172

Keywords: flat slabs; geopolymer; punching; synthetic aggregate

DOI: 10.14359/51740573

Date: 7/1/2024

Abstract:
This paper experimentally analyzed the behavior of steel fiber reinforced geopolymer with red mud (RM) synthetic coarse aggregates. Eight flat slabs were manufactured and subjected to symmetrical punching tests until failure. The results were compared with the estimates of the prescriptions of seven models in the literature. The results show a considerable increase in the punching shear capacity in the group with steel fiber addition; the strength gains in steel fiber-reinforced concrete were 9% and 36% for natural and synthetic aggregates, respectively, and 3% and 27% in geopolymer reinforced concrete. However, the highlight of the post-peak behavior improvement was with the geopolymer concrete, while the slabs with synthetic aggregate showed similar behavior to conventional concrete slabs. Moreover, the theoretical models showed satisfactory predictions in favor of safety and can be applied to geopolymer concrete.

Related References:

1. Hind, A. R.; Bhargava, S. K.; and Grocott, S. C., “The Surface Chemistry of Bayer Process Solids: A Review,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, V. 146, No. 1-3, Jan. 1999, pp. 359-374. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00798-5

2. Kehagia, F., “A Successful Pilot Project Demonstrating the Re-Use Potential of Bauxite Residue in Embankment Construction,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 54, No. 7, May 2010, pp. 417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.10.001

3. de Azevedo, A. R. G.; Marvila, M. T.; de Oliveira, M. A. B.; Umbuzeiro, C. E. M.; Huaman, N. R. C.; and Monteiro, S. N., “Perspectives for the Application of Bauxite Wastes in the Development of Alternative Building Materials,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, V. 20, Sept.-Oct. 2022, pp. 3114-3125. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.092

4. Sglavo, V. M.; Maurina, S.; Conci, A.; Salviati, A.; Carturan, G.; and Cocco, G., “Bauxite ‘Red Mud’ in the Ceramic Industry. Part 2: Production of Clay-Based Ceramics,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, V. 20, No. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 245-252. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00156-9

5. Yalçın, N., and Sevinç, V., “Utilization of Bauxite Waste in Ceramic Glazes,” Ceramics International, V. 26, No. 5, June 2000, pp. 485-493. doi: 10.1016/S0272-8842(99)00083-8

6. Yang, H.; Chen, C.; Pan, L.; Lu, H.; Sun, H.; and Hu, X., “Preparation of Double-Layer Glass-Ceramic/Ceramic Tile from Bauxite Tailings and Red Mud,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, V. 29, No. 10, July 2009, pp. 1887-1894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.007

7. Kavas, T., “Use of Boron Waste as a Fluxing Agent in Production of Red Mud Brick,” Building and Environment, V. 41, No. 12, Dec. 2006, pp. 1779-1783. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.019

8. Vangelatos, I.; Angelopoulos, G. N.; and Boufounos, D., “Utilization of Ferroalumina as Raw Material in the Production of Ordinary Portland Cement,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, V. 168, No. 1, Aug. 2009, pp. 473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.049

9. Tsakiridis, P. E.; Agatzini-Leonardou, S.; and Oustadakis, P., “Red Mud Addition in the Raw Meal for the Production of Portland Cement Clinker,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, V. 116, No. 1-2, Dec. 2004, pp. 103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.002

10. de Oliveira, D. R. C., and Rossi, C. R. C., “Concretes with Red Mud Coarse Aggregates,” Materials Research, V. 15, No. 3, June 2012, pp. 333-340. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392012005000033

11. Sun, Y.; Li, J.-S.; Chen, Z.; Xue, Q.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, L.; and Poon, C. S., “Production of Lightweight Aggregate Ceramsite from Red Mud and Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash: Mechanism and Optimization,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 287, June 2021, Article No. 122993. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122993

12. Tian, K.; Wang, Y.; Hong, S.; Zhang, J.; Hou, D.; Dong, B.; and Xing, F., “Alkali-Activated Artificial Aggregates Fabricated by Red Mud and Fly Ash: Performance and Microstructure,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 281, Apr. 2021, Article No. 122552. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122552

13. Sonafrank, C., “Investigating 21st Century Cement Production in Interior Alaska Using Alaskan Resources,” Cold Climate Housing Research Center (CCHRC), Fairbanks, AK, 2010, 114 pp.

14. Le Talludec, C.; Phelipot-Mardelé, A.; and Lanos, C., “Shrinkage and Geopolymers,” 11th ACI/RILEM International Conference on Cementitious Materials and Alternative Binders for Sustainable Concrete, SP-349, A. Tagnit-Hamou, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2021, pp. 52-61.

15. Huenger, K.-J.; Kurth, D.; and Brigzinsky, M., “Effect of Aggregate Types on Mortar Properties Produced with Geopolymer Binders,” ACI Symposium Publication, 11th ACI/RILEM International Conference on Cementitious Materials and Alternative Binders for Sustainable Concrete, SP-349, A. Tagnit-Hamou, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2021, pp. 290-300.

16. Davidovits, J., “Properties of Geopolymer Cements,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, Ukraine, 1994, pp. 131-149.

17. Gaurav, J.; Modhera, C.; and Patel, D., “Proposed Mixture Design Method for High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 121, No. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 67-78.

18. Lekshmi, S., and Sudhakumar, J., “Performance of Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar Containing Clay Blends,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 119, No. 4, July 2022, pp. 15-26.

19. Cheema, D. S., “Ambient Cured Geopolymer Binder in Road

Pavement-Subgrade Stabilization as a Replacement of Conventional Cement,” Recent Advances in Concrete Technology and Sustainability Issues, SP-355, D. Coffetti, L. Coppola, and T. Holland, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2022, pp. 403-412.

20. Alsaif, A., and Alharbi, Y. R., “Strength, Durability and Shrinkage Behaviours of Steel Fiber Reinforced Rubberized Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 345, Aug. 2022, Article No. 128295. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128295

21. Nzambi, A., and Oliveira, D., “Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with Predetermined Failure Surface and No Stirrups,” Engineering Structures, V. 290, Sept. 2023, Article No. 116339. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116339

22. Nzambi, A.; Gomes, L.; Amanajás, C.; Silva, F.; and Oliveira, D., “Pile Caps with Inclined Shear Reinforcement and Steel Fibers,” Scientific Reports, V. 12, No. 1, 2022, Article No. 10047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14416-2

23. Nzambi, A. K. L. L.; de Oliveira, D. R. C.; de Oliveira, A. M.; and Picanço, M. S., “Pull-Out Tests of Ribbed Steel Reinforcing Bars Embedded in Concrete with Steel Fibres,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Structures and Buildings, V. 174, No. 3, Mar. 2021, pp. 181-189. doi: 10.1680/jstbu.17.00180

24. Tan, K. H., and Venkateshwaran, A., “Punching Shear in Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Slabs with or without Traditional Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May 2019, pp. 107-118. doi: 10.14359/51713291

25. Manfredi, R. P.; de Andrade Silva, F.; and Cardoso, D. C. T., “On Punching Shear Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Slabs-on-Ground,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 119, No. 4, July 2022, pp. 185-196.

26. MacGregor, J. G., Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, second edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992.

27. Talbot, A. N., “Reinforced Concrete Wall Footings and Column Footings,” Bulletin No. 67, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Mar. 1913, 114 pp.

28. Forsell, C., and Holmberg, A., “Concentrated Loads on Concrete Slabs,” Betong, V. 31, No. 2, 1946, pp. 95-123.

29. Elstner, R. C., and Hognestad, E., “Shearing Strength of Reinforced Concrete Slabs,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 53, No. 7, July 1956, pp. 29-58.

30. Hawkins, N. M.; Fallsen, H. B.; and Hinojosa, R. C., “Influence of Column Rectangularity on the Behavior of Flat Plate Structures,” Cracking, Deflection and Ultimate Load of Concrete Slab Systems, SP-30, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1971, pp. 127-146.

31. Shehata, I. A. E. M., and Regan, P. E., “Punching in R.C. Slabs,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 115, No. 7, July 1989, pp. 1726-1740. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:7(1726)

32. Park, R., and Gamble, W. L., Reinforced Concrete Slabs, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1980, 618 pp.

33. Oliveira, D. R. C., “Análise Experimental de Lajes Cogumelo de Concreto Armado com Pilares Retangulares,” PhD thesis, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2003, 237 pp. (in Portuguese)

34. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

35. EN 1992-1-1:2004, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 227 pp.

36. ABNT NBR 6118:2023, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2023, 242 pp. (in Portuguese)

37. fib, “fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013, 434 pp.

38. Harajli, M. H.; Maalouf, D.; and Khatib, H., “Effect of Fibers on the Punching Shear Strength of Slab-Column Connections,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 17, No. 2, 1995, pp. 161-170. doi: 10.1016/0958-9465(94)00031-S

39. Holanda, K. M. A., “Análise dos Mecanismos de Resistentes e das Similaridades de Efeitos da Aadição de Fibras de Aço na Resistência e na Ductilidade à Punção de Lajes-Cogumelo e ao Cisalhamento de Vigas de Concreto,” PhD thesis, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil, 2002, 302 pp. (in Portuguese)

40. Muttoni, A., and Fernández Ruiz, M., “MC2010: The Critical Shear Crack Theory as a Mechanical Model for Punching Shear Design and Its Application to Code Provisions,” fib Bulletin No. 57, International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 31-60.

41. Voo, J. Y. L., and Foster, S. J., “Tensile-Fracture of Fibre-Reinforced Concrete: Variable Engagement Model,” Fibre-Reinforced Concretes: Proceedings of the Sixth International RILEM Symposium (BEFIB 2004), M. di Prisco, R. Felicetti, and G. A. Plizzari, eds., Varenna, Italy, Sept. 2004, pp. 875-884.

42. Mörtel, H., and Boubacar, C., “Analyse von Hochreinen Tonerden und der Einfluss von Verunreinigungen auf das Sinterverhalten,” Deutschen Keramischen Gesellschaft, V. 54, No. 8, 1977, pp. 264-267. (in German)

43. ABNT NBR 16917:2021, “Coarse Aggregate – Determination of Density and Water Absorption,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2021, 6 pp. (in Portuguese)

44. ABNT NBR 10004:2004, “Solid Waste – Classification,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2004, 77 pp. (in Portuguese)

45. ABNT NBR 16974:2022, “Concrete Aggregates – Test Methods of Resistance to Impact and Abrasion by Los Angeles Machine,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2022, 9 pp. (in Portuguese)

46. ABNT NBR 7809:2019, “Coarse Aggregate – Determination of Shape Index by the Caliper – Method of Test,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2019, 7 pp. (in Portuguese)

47. Provis, J. L., “Geopolymers and Other Alkali Activated Materials: Why, How, and What,” Materials and Structures, V. 47, No. 1-2, Jan. 2014, pp. 11-25.

48. Luukkonen, T.; Abdollahnejad, Z.; Yliniemi, J.; Kinnunen, P.; and Illikainen, M., “One-Part Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 103, Jan. 2018, pp. 21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001

49. Rasuli, M. I.; Tajunnisa, Y.; Yamamura, A.; and Shigeishi, M., “A Consideration on the One-Part Mixing Method of Alkali-Activated Material: Problems of Sodium Silicate Solubility and Quick Setting,” Heliyon, V. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2022, Article No. e08783. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08783

50. Ryu, G. S.; Lee, Y. B.; Koh, K. T.; and Chung, Y. S., “The Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete with Alkaline Activators,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, Oct. 2013, pp. 409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.069

51. ABNT NBR 16889:2020, “Fresh Concrete — Slump Test,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2020, 9 pp. (in Portuguese)

52. ABNT NBR 5739:2018, “Concrete — Compression Test of Cylindrical Specimens,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2018, 9 pp. (in Portuguese)

53. ABNT NBR 8522-1:2021, “Hardened Concrete — Determination of Elasticity and Deformation Modulus: Part 1: Static Modulus by Compression,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2021, 24 pp. (in Portuguese)

54. ABNT NBR 5738:2015, “Concrete — Procedure for Molding and Curing Test Specimens,” Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015, 9 pp. (in Portuguese)


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer