Fracture Behavior of Three-Dimensional-Printable Cementitious Mortars in Very Early Ages and Hardened States

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Fracture Behavior of Three-Dimensional-Printable Cementitious Mortars in Very Early Ages and Hardened States

Author(s): K. Sriram Kompella, Andrea Marcucci, Francesco Lo Monte, Marinella Levi, and Liberato Ferrara

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 121

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 49-58

Keywords: flexural strength and work of fracture; influence of layers; shear behavior; testing methods; three dimensional (3-D)-printable cementitious composites; very-early-age tensile constitutive behavior

DOI: 10.14359/51740302

Date: 4/1/2024

Abstract:
The early-age material parameters of three-dimensional (3-D)-printable concrete defined under the umbrella of printability, namely, pumpability, extrudability, buildability, and the “printability window/open time,” are subjective measures. The need to correlate and successively substitute these subjective measures with objective and accepted material properties, such as tensile strength, shear strength, and compressive strength, is paramount. This study validates new testing methodologies to quantify the tensile and shear strengths of printable fiber-reinforced concretes still in their fresh state. A tailored mixture with high sulfoaluminate cement and nonstructural basalt fibers has been assumed as a reference. The relation between the previously mentioned parameters and rheological parameters, such as yield strength obtained through International Center for Aggregates Research (ICAR) rheometer tests, is also explored. Furthermore, in an attempt to pave the way and contribute toward a better understanding of the mechanical properties of 3-D-printed concrete, to be further transferred into design procedures, a comparative study analyzing the work of fracture per unit crack width in three-point bending has been performed on printed and companion nominally identical monolithically cast specimens, investigating the effects of printing directions, position in the printed circuit, and specimen slenderness (length to depth) ratio.

Related References:

1. Dixit, S.; Mandal, S. N.; Sawhney, A.; and Singh, S., “Relationship between Skill Development and Productivity in Construction Sector: A Literature Review,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), V. 8, No. 8, 2017, pp. 649-665.

2. Bos, F.; Wolfs, R.; Ahmed, Z.; and Salet, T., “Additive Manufacturing of Concrete in Construction: Potentials and Challenges of 3D Concrete Printing,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, V. 11, No. 3, 2016, pp. 209-225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

3. Bos, F. P.; Menna, C.; Pradena, M.; Kreiger, E.; Leal da Silva, W. R.; Rehman, A. U.; Weger, D.; Wolfs, R. J. M.; Zhang, Y.; Ferrara, L.; and Mechtcherine, V., “The Realities of Additively Manufactured Concrete Structures in Practice,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 156, 2022, Article No. 106746.

4. Menna, C.; Mata-Falcón, J.; Bos, F. P.; Vantyghem, G.; Ferrara, L.; Asprone, D.; Salet, T.; and Kaufmann, W., “Opportunities and Challenges for Structural Engineering of Digitally Fabricated Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 133, 2020, Article No. 106079.

5. Buswell, R. A.; Leal de Silva, W. R.; Jones, S. Z.; and Dirrenberger, J., “3D Printing Using Concrete Extrusion: A Roadmap for Research,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

6. Wangler, T.; Lloret, E.; Reiter, L.; Hack, N.; Gramazio, F.; Kohler, M.; Bernhard, M.; Dillenburger, B.; Buchli, J.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R., “Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 1, 2016, pp. 67-75. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16

7. Esposito Corcione, C.; Palumbo, E.; Masciullo, A.; Montagna, F.; and Torricelli, M. C., “Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): An Innovative Technique Aimed at Reusing Lecce Stone Waste for Industrial Design and Building Applications,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 158, 2018, pp. 276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.011

8. Lim, S.; Buswell, R. A.; Le, T. T.; Austin, S. A.; Gibb, A. G. F.; and Thorpe, T., “Developments in Construction-Scale Additive Manufacturing Processes,” Automation in Construction, V. 21, 2012, pp. 262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010

9. Vantyghem, G.; De Corte, W.; Shakour, E.; and Amir, O., “3D Printing of a Post-Tensioned Concrete Girder Designed by Topology Optimization,” Automation in Construction, V. 112, 2020, Article No. 103084.

10. Wangler, T.; Roussel, N.; Bos, F. P.; Salet, T. A. M.; and Flatt, R. J., “Digital Concrete: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 123, 2019, Article No. 105780.

11. Reiter, L.; Wangler, T.; Anton, A.; and Flatt, R. J., “Setting on Demand for Digital Concrete – Principles, Measurements, Chemistry, Validation,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 132, 2020, Article No. 106047.

12. Wolfs, R. J. M.; Bos, F. P.; and Salet, T. A. M., “Early Age Mechanical Behaviour of 3D Printed Concrete: Numerical Modelling and Experimental Testing,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 106, 2018, pp. 103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001

13. Perrot, A.; Rangeard, D.; and Pierre, A. “Structural Built-Up of Cement-Based Materials Used for 3D-Printing Extrusion Techniques,” Materials and Structures, V. 49, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1213-1220.

14. Mettler, L. K.; Wittel, F. K.; Flatt, R. J.; and Herrmann, H. J., “Evolution of Strength and Failure of SCC during Early Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 89, 2016, pp. 288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.09.004

15. Reiter, L.; Wangler, T.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R. J., “The Role of Early Age Structural Build-Up in Digital Fabrication With Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.011

16. Mechtcherine, V.; Bos, F. P.; Perrot, A.; Leal da Silva, W. R.; Nerella, V. N.; Fataei, S.; Wolfs, R. J. M.; Sanebi, M.; and Roussel, N., “Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Cement-Based Materials – Production Steps, Processes, and Their Underlying Physics: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 132, 2020, Article No. 106037.

17. Río, O.; Rodríguez, A.; Nabulsi, S.; and Álvarez, M., “Pumping Quality Control Method Based on Online Concrete Pumping Assessment,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 4, July-Aug. 2011, pp. 423-431.

18. Kwon, S. H.; Jang, K. P.; Kim, J. H.; and Shah, S. P., “State of the Art on Prediction of Concrete Pumping,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 10, No. 3, 2016, pp. 75-85. doi: 10.1007/s40069-016-0150-y

19. Mohan, M. K.; Rahul, A. V.; De Schutter, G.; and Van Tittelboom, K., “Early Age Hydration, Rheology and Pumping Characteristics of CSA Cement-Based 3D Printable Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 275, 2021, Article No. 122136.

20. Roussel, N., “Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005

21. Nerella, V. N.; Näther, M.; Iqbal, A.; Butler, M.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Inline Quantification of Extrudability of Cementitious Materials for Digital Construction,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 95, 2019, pp. 260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.015

22. Perrot, A.; Rangeard, D.; Nerella, V. N.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Extrusion of Cement-Based Materials - An Overview,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 3, 2018, pp. 91-97. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2018.75

23. Bos, F. P.; Kruger, P. J.; Lucas, S. S.; and van Zijl, G. P. A. G., “Juxtaposing Fresh Material Characterisation Methods for Buildability Assessment of 3D Printable Cementitious Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 120, 2021, Article No. 104024.

24. Nerella, V. N., Krause, M., and Mechtcherine, V., “Direct Printing Test for Buildability of 3D-Printable Concrete Considering Economic Viability,” Automation in Construction, V. 109, 2020, Article No. 102986.

25. Kruger, J.; Zeranka, S.; and van Zijl, G., “3D Concrete Printing: A Lower Bound Analytical Model for Buildability Performance Quantification,” Automation in Construction, V. 106, 2019, Article No. 102904.

26. Casagrande, L.; Esposito, L.; Menna, C.; Asprone, D.; and Auricchio, F., “Effect of Testing Procedures on Buildability Properties of 3D-Printable Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 245, 2020, Article No. 118286.

27. Mohan, M. K.; Rahul, A. V.; De Schutter, G.; and Van Tittelboom, K., “Extrusion-Based Concrete 3D Printing from a Material Perspective: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 115, 2021, Article No. 103855.

28. Ding, T.; Xiao, J.; Zou, S.; and Yu, J., “Flexural Properties of 3D Printed Fibre-Reinforced Concrete with Recycled Sand,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 288, 2021, Article No. 123077. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123077

29. Le, T. T.; Austin, S. A.; Lim, S.; Buswell, R. A.; Law, R.; Gibb, A. G. F.; and Thorpe, T., “Hardened Properties of High-Performance Printing Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 3, 2012, pp. 558-566. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003

30. Feng, P.; Meng, X.; Chen, J.-F.; and Ye, L., “Mechanical Properties of Structures 3D Printed with Cementitious Powders,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 93, 2015, pp. 486-497. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.132

31. Rahul, A. V.; Santhanam, M.; Meena, H.; and Ghani, Z., “3D Printable Concrete: Mixture Design and Test Methods,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 97, 2019, pp. 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014

32. Rahul, A. V.; Santhanam, M.; Meena, H.; and Ghani, Z., “Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printable Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 227, 2019, Article No. 116710. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710

33. Nerella, V. N.; Hempel, S.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Effects of Layer-

Interface Properties on Mechanical Performance of Concrete Elements Produced by Extrusion-Based 3D-Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 205, 2019, pp. 586-601. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.235

34. Nerella, V. N.; Hempel, S.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Micro- and Macroscopic Investigations on the Interface between Layers of 3D-Printed Cementitious Elements,” Proceedings, International Conference on Advances in Construction Materials and Systems (ICACMS 2017), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 2017, 11 pp.

35. Zareiyan, B., and Khoshnevis, B., “Effects of Interlocking on Interlayer Adhesion and Strength of Structures in 3D Printing of Concrete,” Automation in Construction, V. 83, 2017, pp. 212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019

36. Craipeau, T.; Toussaint, F.; Perrot, A.; and Lecompte, T., “Experimental Approach on a Moving Formwork,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 270, 2021, Article No. 121472.

37. Lee, K. H.; Nam, S. Y.; Min, S. E.; Lee, H.-W.; Han, C.; and Ahn, J.-W., “Characterizations of High Early-Strength Type Shrinkage Reducing Cement and Calcium Sulfo-Aluminate by Using Industrial Wastes,” Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, V. 53, No. 2, 2016, pp. 215-221. doi: 10.4191/kcers.2016.53.2.215

38. Stefanoni, M.; Angst, U.; and Elsener, B., “Corrosion Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Fabrication of Reinforced Concrete,” First RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication – Digital Concrete 2018, T. Wangler and R. J. Flatt, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 225-233.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer