Title:
Active and Visual Methods for Teaching Nonrectangular Reinforced Concrete Beams
Author(s):
J.Chris Carroll, Anahid A. Behrouzi, Karl F. Meyer
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
359
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
145-161
Keywords:
active learning, reinforced concrete, nonrectangular beams, physical artifacts, skeleton-style notes, collaborative learning, problem-based learning
DOI:
10.14359/51740295
Date:
11/1/2023
Abstract:
Nonrectangular cross sections are a common occurrence in reinforced concrete design typically taking the form of flanged beam sections, circular columns, and square or rectangular columns subject to biaxial bending. Instructors typically introduce the theory behind nonrectangular beams using two-dimensional sketches of flanged sections. Students can struggle to visualize the examples when presented in two dimensions; deciphering the multiple resultant compressive forces and their corresponding moment arms are particularly difficult. This paper presents an overview of nonrectangular beam theory and select active learning methods along with three specific examples used by the authors to teach nonrectangular beams in an undergraduate reinforced concrete design course. The first method is a simple problem-based learning example to dissuade students from “plug and chug” calculations using improper equations; the second method illustrates three cases for a traditional flanged T-beam section using physical three-dimensional models; and the third method uses virtual three-dimensional models to derive the depth of the equivalent stress block and corresponding nominal flexural strength for various cross sections. Each description provides the reader with the best practices to implement the respective technique. Lastly, the authors provide some lessons learned from their past implementations. The overall goal is to provide educators with examples to simplify the presentation of nonrectangular beams theory.
Related References:
ACI Committee 318 (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
Albanese, M., and Mitchell, S. (1993). "Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementational Issues." Academic Medicine, 68(1).
Behrouzi, A. (2015). "Physical Models in the Reinforced Concrete Design Classroom." Concrete International, 37(9), 36-40.
Behrouzi, A. (2016). "Physical Artifacts in Introductory-level Reinforced Concrete Design Instruction." Proc., 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
Carroll, J. C. (2013). "Competiton-based Learning in the Classroom." 2013 Annual Conference for the American Society for Engineering EducationAtlanta, GA.
Carroll, J. C., Dymond, B. Z., and Behrouzi, A. (2023). "Teaching the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block." ACI SP: Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Teaching Concrete Materials and Reinforced Concrete.
Dymond, B. Z., Swenty, M. K., and Carroll, J. C. (2018). "The Influence of Grading Bias on Reinforced Concrete Exam Scores at Three Different Universities." Proc., 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education.
Dymond, B. Z., Swenty, M. K., and Carroll, J. C. (2020). "Comparing Exam Performance in a Reinforced Concrete Design Course with Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels." Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 146(1).
Estes, A., and Welch, R. (2005). "Teaching Pedagogy 101." ASEE Annual Conference and ExpositionPortlantd, OR.
Estes, A., Welch, R., and Resseler, S. J. (2015). "The ExCEEd Teaching Model." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education, 131(4), 218-222.
Felder, R. M., and Spurlin, J. (2005). "Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles." International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
Kahn, L. F., and Meyer, K. F. (1995). "Rectangular Stress Block for Nonrectangular Compression Zone." ACI Structural Journal, 92(3), 304-310.
Mattock, A. H., and Kriz, L. B. (1961). "Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members." ACI Journal, 57(1), 737-766.
McCormac, J. C., and Brown, R. H. (2016). Design of Reinforced Concrete, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
Norman, G., and Schmidt, H. (2000). "Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Curricula: Theory, Practice and Paper Darts." Medical Education, 34, 721-728.
Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
Prince, M. J. (2004). "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research." Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Prince, M. J., and Felder, R. M. (2006). "inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases." Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
Rusch, H. (1960). "Researches Toward a General Flexural Theory for Structural Concrete." ACI Journal, 57(1), 1-28.
Shin, S.-W., Kamara, M., and Ghosh, S. K. (1990). "Flexural Ductility, Strength Prediction, and Hysteretic Behavior of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete Members." Proc., Utilizatiion of High-High Strength Concrete—Second Intenational Symposium, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 230-264.
Swenty, M. K., Dymond, B. Z., and Carroll, J. C. (2023). "Effective Teaching Methods in Concrete Education." ACI SP: Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Teaching Concrete Materials and Reinforced Concrete.
Vander Schaaf, R., and Klosky, L. (2003). "“Show Me the Money!” Using Physical Models to Excite Student Interest in Mechanics." ASEE Annual Conference and ExpositionNashville, TN.
Vander Schaaf, R., and Klosky, L. (2005). "Classroom Demonstrations in Introductory Mechanics." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education, 131(2), 83-89.
Vernon, D., and Blake, R. (1993). "Does Problem-Based Learning Work? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluative Research." Academic Medicine, 68(7).
Wankat, P. C., and Oreovicz, F. S. (2015). Teaching Engineering (2nd Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wight, J. K. (2016). Reinforced Concrete - Mechanics and Design, Pearson Education, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.