Title:
Pedagogical Techniques used to Teach Fresh and Hardened Concrete Properties
Author(s):
Kacie C. D’Alessandro, Andrei Ramniceanu, Jacob D. Henschen, Matt O’Reilly
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
359
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
39-53
Keywords:
portland cement, hydration, maturity, microstructure, active learning, in-class demonstrations, concept mapping, inquiry-based learning, daily quiz technology, reinforced concrete pier, strengthening, theoretical model, ultra-high performance concrete
DOI:
10.14359/51740289
Date:
11/1/2023
Abstract:
This paper presents pedagogical techniques used to teach fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Fresh properties of concrete include the evaluation of slump, unit weight, and air content. The hardened properties of concrete include compressive and tensile strengths. Students typically have little to no prior experience working with concrete. Since concrete structures date back to Ancient Rome, many students assume concrete is a basic material that has not changed in centuries, and they do not view concrete as an engineered material. Therefore, their understanding of how concrete is an engineered material and its use is essential. This paper focuses on how both fresh and hardened concrete properties are taught in the classroom to best introduce students to concrete as an engineered material. The pedagogical methods focus on engaging students using experiential education through hands-on laboratory activities, projects, and game-based learning activities. Examples of the pedagogical approaches are presented herein, and they are supported by lessons learned by the authors based on their experience implementing these methods in the classroom.
two environmental conditions, sustained elevated temperatures (ST) and freeze-thaw (FT) cycles. The
concrete cylinders were wrapped with a single layer of GFRP and CFRP wrap. GFRP wraps improved concrete
strength by up to 30% and ductility in excess of 600% for ambient condition specimens, while the enhancements
in strength and ductility under the same conditions by CFRP wraps were about 70% and 700%, respectively. The strength enhancements were reduced severely for specimens tested under ST protocol beyond the glass transition temperature (Tg) with a minor reduction in ductility enhancement. On the other hand, freeze-thaw
conditioning showed minimal effect on strength and ductility enhancements provided by the FRP wraps. The current and past findings were then used to suggest environmental reduction factors for the design of FRP wraps. A comparison of these factors with ACI 440.2R-17 showed that environmental factors suggested by the ACI
code were not applicable at temperatures beyond Tg.
Related References:
Abdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283-294.
ACI Committee 211, 2022, “ACI PRC-211.1-22 Selecting Proportions for Normal-Density and High-Density Concrete – Guide,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM Standard C143/C143M, 2020, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, doi: 10.1520/C0143_C0143M-20
ASTM Standard C1611/C1611M, 2021, “Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, doi: 10.1520/C1611_C1611M-21
ASTM Standard C173/C173M, 2016, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Volumetric Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, doi: 10.1520/C0173_C0173M-16
ASTM Standard C231/C231M, 2022, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, doi: 10.1520/C0231_C0231M-22
ASTM Standard C138/C138M, 2017, “Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, doi: 10.1520/C0138_C0138M-17A
ASTM Standard C1064/C1064M, 2017, “Standard Test Method for Temperature of Freshly Mixed Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, doi: 10.1520/C1064_C1064M-17
ASTM Standard C403/C403M, 2016, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, doi: 10.1520/C0403_C0403M-16
ASTM Standard C191/C191M, 2021, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, doi: 10.1520/C0191-21
ASTM Standard C31/C31M, 2022, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, doi: 10.1520/C0031M-22
ASTM Standard C39/C39M, 2021, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, doi: 10.1520/C0039_C0039M-21
ASTM Standard C496/C496M, 2017, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, doi: 10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17
ASTM C78/C78M, 2010, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, doi: 10.1520/C0078-09
ASTM Standard C469/C469M, 2022, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, doi: 10.1520/C0469_C0469M-22
ASTM Standard C512/C512M, 2015, “Standard Test Method for Creep of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, doi: 10.1520/C0512_C0512M-15
ASTM Standard C157/C157M, 2017, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, doi: 10.1520/C0157_C0157M-17
Desing, R. M., Kajfez, R. L., Kecskemety, K., M, and Grzybowski, D. M. (2022). Intersections Between Entrepreneurial Minded Learning, Identify, and Motivation in Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(5), 1389-1407.
Drew, C. (2023). “What are Pedagogical Skills? – 15 Examples.” Helpful Professor, (accessed 13 September 2023).
Hughes, J., Thomas, R. and Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing Technology Integration: The RAT – Replacement, Amplification, and Transformation - Framework. Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Orlando, FL, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 1616-1620.
Jahren, P. and Sui T. (2017). History of Concrete: A Very Old and Modern Material, World Scientific / Chemical Industry Press, China. Kahoot! (2023). (accessed 6 January 2023).
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson Education.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (3), 223-231.
Prince, M., and Felder, R. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
Swenty, M. K., Dymond, B. Z, and Carroll, J. C. (2023). Effective Teaching Methods in Concrete Education. ACI SP: Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Teaching Concrete Materials and Reinforced Concrete.