Title:
Approaches to Teaching Cement Hydration Processes to Undergraduate Students
Author(s):
Lisa E. Burris, Kenneth C. Hover, Anton K. Schindler, Aleksandra Radlinska
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
359
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
18-38
Keywords:
portland cement, hydration, maturity, microstructure, active learning, in-class demonstrations, concept mapping, inquiry-based learning, daily quiz technology, reinforced concrete pier, strengthening, theoretical model, ultra-high performance concrete
DOI:
10.14359/51740288
Date:
11/1/2023
Abstract:
Concrete continues to be the most widely used material in the world, second only to water. Concrete is used in most civil infrastructure systems, but it often remains inadequately understood by the profession. For civil engineers to adapt to a world requiring ever-increasing efficiency, durability, and sustainability, and in which novel material formulations and products are introduced monthly, engineers must be able to make decisions as to the acceptability of these materials, and their effect on the performance of civil infrastructure. Essential to that ability is students’ understanding of the basics of cement hydration and its relationship to property development in the fresh and hardened concrete state. Towards that goal, this paper presents the basics of cement hydration, resources for learning more about the subject, and approaches to transferring knowledge to undergraduate-level students, through both lecture- and lab-based activities. Topics addressed include prioritization of topics for undergraduate civil engineering students to learn with regards to cement hydration processes, approaches to effective teaching of these topics including active learning in the classroom and laboratory, as well as knowledge exchange strategies, assessment techniques, and lessons learned from past experiences teaching these topics.
Related References:
ACI 202.2R-16, Section 6.2.2.2. (2016). Guide to Durable Concrete, American Concrete Institute.
ACI 211.1-91. (2009). Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, American Concrete Institute.
ACI 318-19 (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute.
Armour-Thomas, Eleanor, and Edmund W. Gordon. (2013). Toward an understanding of assessment as a dynamic component of pedagogy. Princeton NJ: Gordon Commission.
ASTM C1074 – 19. (2019). Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
Barrella, E.M., and M. K. Watson. (2016). Comparing the outcomes of horizontal and vertical integration of sustainability content into engineering curricula using concept maps. New developments in engineering education for sustainable development. Springer, Cham. 1-13.
Bartlett, M. G., and K. A. Morrow. (2001). Method for assessing course knowledge in a large classroom environment: an improved version of the minute paper. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 65.3. 264-266.Braun, K.W., and R.D. Sellers. (2012). Using a “daily motivational quiz” to increase student preparation, attendance, and participation. Issues in Accounting Education 27.1. 267-279.
Chizmar, J.F., and A.L. Ostrosky. (1998). "The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings." The Journal of Economic Education 29.1. 3-10.
Connor-Greene, P.A. (2000). Assessing and promoting student learning: Blurring the line between teaching and testing. Teaching of Psychology 27.2. 84-88. Crouch, C., Crouch, C., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics 72.6. 835-838.
Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. D., Blankmeyer, K. L., Tennial, R. E., & Garczynski, A. M. (2011). Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study of Active Teaching Techniques. Journal of Effective Teaching 11.2. 40-54.
Jungmann, T. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in the engineering sciences. Inquiry-based learning–undergraduate research. Springer, Cham. 205-215.
Klieger, P. (1958). Effect of Mixing and Curing Temperature on Concrete Strength. Research Department Bulletin RX103. Portland cement Association. Skokie, Ill.
Kothiyal, A., S. Murthy, and S. Iyer. (2014). Think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: does learning really happen? Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education.
Kresta, S.M. (1998). Hands‐on demonstrations: An alternative to full scale lab experiments. Journal of Engineering Education 87.1. 7-9.
Kugel, P. (1989). Improving learning without improving teaching. Computer Science Education 1.2. 145-152. Kwan, F. (2011). Formative Assessment: The One-Minute Paper vs. the Daily Quiz." Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 5.
Mawhinney, V.T., D.E. Bostow, D.R. Laws, G.J. Blumenfeld, B.L.Hopkins. (1971). A comparison of students studying-behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 4.4. 257-264, doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-257
Mehta, P.K., and P.J.M. Monteiro. (2017). Concrete Microstructure, Properties and Materials.
Mindess, S., Young, J.F., and Darwin, D. (2003). Concrete, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Neville, A. (2011). Properties of concrete 6th Ed. Trans-Atlantic Publications, Inc. Poole, J. L., Riding, K. A., Juenger, M. C. G., Folliard, K. J., & Schindler, A. K. (2010). Effects of supplementary cementitious materials on apparent activation energy. Journal of ASTM International 7.9. 1-16.
Sharma, M.D., Johnston, I.D., Johnston, H., Varvell, K., Robertson, G., Hopkins, A., Stewart, C., Cooper, I. and Thornton, R. (2010). Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten-year study. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6.2. 020119.
Sokoloff, D.R., and R.K. Thornton. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher 35.6. 340-347.
Swenty, M.K., Dymond, B.Z., Carroll, C. (2023). Effective Teaching Methods in Concrete Education. ACI SP: Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Teaching Concrete Materials and Reinforced Concrete.
Taylor, H.F.W. (1997). Cement chemistry. Vol. 2. London: Thomas Telford.
Taylor, H.F.W., C. Famy, K.L. Scrivener. (2001). Review of Delayed Ettringite Formation. Cement and Concrete Research. 31, 683-693.
Turns, J., C.J. Atman, and R. Adams. (2000). Concept maps for engineering education: A cognitively motivated tool supporting varied assessment functions. IEEE Transactions on Education 43.2. 164-173.
Uziak, J. (2016). A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. Global Journal of Engineering Education 18.2. 119-123.
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and L. Klotz. (2010). Incorporating the social dimension of sustainability into civil engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice 137.4. 189-197.
Verbeck, G.J., Helmuth, R.A. (1968). Structures And Physical Properties of Cement Paste. Proc. 5th International Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement. Tokyo. Part III. pp.1-32.
Webber, K.L. (2012). The use of learner-centered assessment in US colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education 53.2. 201-228.
Williams, D.P. (2015). Problem Based Learning Approaches to Teaching Chemistry', Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Stem) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. Volume 4. 93-112.
Wilson, M.L., P.D. Tennis (2021). Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. Portland Cement Association, 17th Edition, 520 pp.
Wojcik, T.G., Clayton, G.M., Radlińska, A., Comolli, N.K. (2012). The Value of Impromptu Design Exercises as an Approach in Design-Centric Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol.28 (4). Special Issue on Design-centric Engineering Education.