Cementitious Resins for Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beams with Near-Surface-Mounted Carbon Fiber- Reinforced Polymer

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Cementitious Resins for Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beams with Near-Surface-Mounted Carbon Fiber- Reinforced Polymer

Author(s): Yail J. Kim and Wajdi Ammar

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 137-149

Keywords: carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); cementitious resins; near-surface-mounted (NSM); rehabilitation; retrofit; strengthening

DOI: 10.14359/51738720

Date: 7/1/2023

Abstract:
This paper presents the feasibility and relevance of cementitious resins as bonding agents for near-surface-mounted (NSM) carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips. Contrary to conventional organic matrixes, such inorganic resins offer promising performance when subjected to aggressive environments, especially under thermal distress. Three emerging resins are employed (polyester-silica, ultra-high-performance concrete [UHPC], and geopolymer) to strengthen reinforced concrete beams alongside NSM CFRP. After stochastically simulating various levels of pitting corrosion for a period of 100 years, the outcomes arerepresented in the beams by reducing the cross-sectional area of steel reinforcement before applying the rehabilitation system. The emphasis of experimental investigations lies in the workability of those resins and the flexural response of the retrofitted beams. Material-level testing reveals that the rheological properties of the resins are not related to their compressive strength. As far as load-carrying capacity is concerned, the beams bonded with polyester-silica outperform the beams with other resins; however, UHPC enables stable degradation over the years. The interfacial characteristics of the resins dominate the mechanical interaction between the damaged internal reinforcing steel and CFRP, therebyaltering the tendency of capacity drops, post-yield plateaus, and crack distributions. Through analytical modeling, the provisions of existing design guidelines are evaluated, and a modification factor is suggested to promote the cementitious resins for NSM CFRP.

Related References:

1. Reddy, G. R., “On Structural Rehabilitation and Retrofitting for Risk Reduction,” Civil Engineering for Disaster Risk Reduction, S. Kolathayar, I. Pal, S. C. Chian, and A. Mondal, eds., Springer, Singapore, 2022, pp. 373-381.

2. Aprile, A., and Monti, G., “Advanced Methods for Structural Rehabilitation,” Buildings, V. 12, No. 1, Jan. 2022, Article No. 79. doi: 10.3390/buildings12010079

3. Zaiter, A., and Lau, T. L., “Experimental Study of Jacket Height and Reinforcement Effects on Seismic Retrofitting of Concrete Columns,” Structures, V. 31, June 2021, pp. 1084-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.020

4. Chung, P.-T., and Chou, C.-C., “One-Sided Shear Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Existing High-Rise Buildings,” Engineering Structures, V. 252, Feb. 2022, Article No. 113634. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113634

5. Xue, W.; Tan, Y.; and Peng, F., “Experimental Study on Damaged Prestressed Concrete Beams Using External Post-Tensioned Tendons,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 159-168.

6. Labò, S.; Passoni, C.; Marini, A.; and Belleri, A., “Design of Diagrid Exoskeletons for the Retrofit of Existing RC Buildings,” Engineering Structures, V. 220, Oct. 2020, Article No. 110899. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110899

7. Zhang, C.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.; and Luo, W., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Seismic Performance of Retrofitted RC Frame with Sector Lead Viscoelastic Damper,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 44, Dec. 2021, Article No. 103218. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103218

8. Cao, X.-Y.; Wu, G.; and Ju, J.-W. W., “Seismic Performance Improvement of Existing RCFs Using External PT-PBSPC Frame Sub-Structures: Experimental Verification and Numerical Investigation,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 46, Apr. 2022, Article No. 103649. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103649

9. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures (ACI 440.2R-17),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2017, 112 pp.

10. Grande, E., and Milani, G., “Numerical Study of the Bond Behavior of DMF Systems,” Structures, V. 31, June 2021, pp. 921-939. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.013

11. De Lorenzis, L., and Teng, J. G., “Near-Surface Mounted FRP Reinforcement: An Emerging Technique for Strengthening Structures,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 38, No. 2, Mar. 2007, pp. 119-143. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.003

12. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Systems for Strengthening Unreinforced Masonry Structures (ACI 440.7R-10),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2010, 46 pp.

13. Yang, S.; Wang, S.; Fang, X.; and Tao, Y., “Bond Performance between NSM FRP Rods and Concrete Using ECC as Bonding Materials,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Performance-based and Life-cycle Structural Engineering (PLSE 2015), D. Fernando, J.-G. Teng, and J. L. Torero, eds., Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2015, pp. 490-495.

14. Al-Saadi, N. T. K.; Mohammed, A.; and Al-Mahaidi, R., “Assessment of Residual Strength of Concrete Girders Rehabilitated Using NSM CFRP with Cementitious Adhesive Made with Graphene Oxide after Exposure to Fatigue Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 153, Oct. 2017, pp. 402-422. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.121

15. Kuntal, V. S.; Chellapandian, M.; Prakash, S. S.; and Sharma, A., “Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Inorganic Bonding Materials for Near-Surface Mounting Shear Strengthening of Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Fibers, V. 8, No. 6, June 2020, Article No. 40. doi: 10.3390/fib8060040

16. Elsanadedy, H. M.; Abbas, H.; Almusallam, T. H.; and Al-Salloum, Y. A., “Organic versus Inorganic Matrix Composites for Bond-Critical Strengthening Applications of RC Structures – State-of-the-Art Review,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 174, Oct. 2019, Article No. 106947. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106947

17. Yu, J.-G.; Cheng, L.; Liu, S.; Fu, B.; and Li, B., “Inorganic Adhesive Based Near-Surface-Mounted Fibre Reinforced Polymer for Strengthening of Concrete Structures: An Overview,” Structures, V. 33, Oct. 2021, pp. 2099-2120. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.017

18. Thoft-Christensen, P.; Jensen, F. M.; Middleton, C. R.; and Blackmore, A., “Assessment of the Reliability of Concrete Slab Bridges,” Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems: Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conference, D. M. Frangopol, R. B. Corotis, and R. Rackwitz, eds., Boulder, CO, 1996, pp. 1-8.

19. Sagüés, A. A., “Modeling the Effects of Corrosion on the Lifetime of Extended Reinforced Concrete Structures,” CORROSION, V. 59, No. 10, Oct. 2003, pp. 854-866. doi: 10.5006/1.3287706

20. Elsener, B., and Angst, U., “Corrosion Inhibitors for Reinforced Concrete,” Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures, P.-C. Aïtcin and R. J. Flatt, eds., Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 2016, pp. 321-339.

21. Cao, C., and Cheung, M. M. S., “Non-Uniform Rust Expansion for Chloride-Induced Pitting Corrosion in RC Structures,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 51, Jan. 2014, pp. 75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.042

22. Vu, K. A. T., and Stewart, M. G., “Structural Reliability of Concrete Bridges Including Improved Chloride-Induced Corrosion Models,” Structural Safety, V. 22, No. 4, 2000, pp. 313-333. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00018-7

23. Ahmad, Z., Principles of Corrosion Engineering and Corrosion Control, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2006.

24. Aslett, L. J. M.; Coolen, F. P. A.; and De Bock, J., eds., Uncertainty in Engineering: Introduction to Methods and Applications, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2022.

25. Okeil, A. M.; El-Tawil, S.; and Shahawy, M., “Flexural Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Girders Strengthened with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 7, No. 5, Sept. 2002, pp. 290-299. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(290)

26. Li, C. Q., and Melchers, R. E., “Time-Dependent Risk Assessment of Structural Deterioration Caused by Reinforcement Corrosion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2005, pp. 754-762.

27. Val, D. V., and Stewart, M. G., “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Marine Environments,” Structural Safety, V. 25, No. 4, Oct. 2003, pp. 343-362. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00014-6

28. Stewart, M. G., and Rosowsky, D. V., “Time-Dependent Reliability of Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks,” Structural Safety, V. 20, No. 1, 1998, pp. 91-109. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00021-0

29. Fox, M.; Trost, S.; and Hellman, S., “Evaluation of Novel Methods to Measure Water-to-Cement Ratio of Fresh Concrete,” Final Report for Highway IDEA Project 105, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2007, 46 pp.

30. Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R., Reliability of Structures, second edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.

31. Mirza, S. A.; Kikuchi, D. K.; and MacGregor, J. G., “Flexural Strength Reduction Factor for Bonded Prestressed Concrete Beams,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 77, No. 4, July-Aug. 1980, pp. 237-246.

32. Baji, H., and Ronagh, H. R., “Reliability-Based Study on Ductility Measures of Reinforced Concrete Beams in ACI 318,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2016, pp. 373-382. doi: 10.14359/51688201

33. Kim, S.; Frangopol, D. M.; and Zhu, B., “Probabilistic Optimum Inspection/Repair Planning to Extend Lifetime of Deteriorating Structures,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, V. 25, No. 6, Dec. 2011, pp. 534-544. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000197

34. Atadero, R. A., and Karbhari, V. M., “Calibration of Resistance Factors for Reliability Based Design of Externally-Bonded FRP Composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 39, No. 4, June 2008, pp. 665-679. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.06.004

35. Stewart, M. G.; Estes, A. C.; and Frangopol, D. M., “Bridge Deck Replacement for Minimum Expected Cost Under Multiple Reliability Constraints,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 130, No. 9, Sept. 2004, pp. 1414-1419. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1414)

36. Darwin, D.; Browning, J.; O’Reilly, M.; Locke, C. E. Jr.; and Virmani, Y. P., “Multiple Corrosion-Protection Systems for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Components,” Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-060, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2011, 260 pp.

37. Yuan, Y.; Jiang, J.; and Peng, T., “Corrosion Process of Steel Bar in Concrete in Full Lifetime,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 107, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2010, pp. 562-567.

38. ASTM C39/C39M-18, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 8 pp.

39. ASTM C807-20, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement Mortar by Modified Vicat Needle,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 3 pp.

40. ASTM C1090/C1090M-15, “Standard Test Method for Measuring Changes in Height of Cylindrical Specimens of Hydraulic-Cement Grout,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 6 pp.

41. ASTM C1543-10, “Standard Test Method for Determining the Penetration of Chloride Ion into Concrete by Ponding (Withdrawn 2019),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.

42. ASTM C666/C666M-15, “Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.

43. ASTM C109/C109M-20, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 11 pp.

44. Vargas, M. A.; Sachsenheimer, K.; and Guthausen, G., “In-Situ Investigations of the Curing of a Polyester Resin,” Polymer Testing, V. 31, No. 1, Feb. 2012, pp. 127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.10.004

45. Sudirman; Anggaravidya, M.; Budianto, E.; and Gunawan, I., “Synthesis and Characterization of Polyester-Based Nanocomposite,” Procedia Chemistry, V. 4, 2012, pp. 107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.016

46. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, fourth edition, Prentice Hall, Essex, UK, 1995.

47. Meng, W., and Khayat, K. H., “Effect of Graphite Nanoplatelets and Carbon Nanofibers on Rheology, Hydration, Shrinkage, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of UHPC,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 105, Mar. 2018, pp. 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.001

48. Xu, H., and Van Deventer, J. S. J., “The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate Minerals,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, V. 59, No. 3, June 2000, pp. 247-266. doi: 10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5

49. Bauer, E.; de Sousa, J. G. G.; Guimarães, E. A.; and Silva, F. G. S., “Study of the Laboratory Vane Test on Mortars,” Building and Environment, V. 42, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.016

50. Ramsey, M. S., “Rheology, Viscosity, and Fluid Types,” Practical Wellbore Hydraulics and Hole Cleaning: Unlock Faster, More Efficient, and Trouble-Free Drilling Operations, Gulf Professional Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 2019, pp. 217-237.

51. Akono, A. T.; Koric, S.; and Kriven, W. M., “Influence of Pore Structure on the Strength Behavior of Particle- and Fiber-Reinforced Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Composites,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 104, Nov. 2019, Article No. 103361. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103361

52. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

53. Abrishambaf, A.; Pimentel, M.; and Nunes, S., “Influence of Fibre Orientation on the Tensile Behaviour of Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Composites,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 97, July 2017, pp. 28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.007

54. Naaman, A. E.; Burns, N.; French, C.; Gamble, W. L.; and Mattock, A. H., “Stresses in Unbonded Prestressing Tendons at Ultimate: Recommendation,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 4, July-Aug. 2002, pp. 518-531


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer