Title:
Optimization of Activator Concentration for Graphene Oxide-Based Alkali-Activated Binder
Author(s):
D. F. Marbaniang, A. Kar, D. Adak, K. K. Ramagiri, D. Srinivas, and I. Ray
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
120
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
57-72
Keywords:
alkali-activated slag; alkali activator concentration; graphene oxide; layered double hydroxides; optimization
DOI:
10.14359/51738708
Date:
5/1/2023
Abstract:
Thermal-cured alkali-activated binders (AABs) are a potential
replacement for traditional portland cement (PC) in concrete,
primarily for precast applications. To avoid this energy-intensive regime and encourage wider application, this study investigates the development of ambient-cured AABs by adding graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles. The mechanical strength and durability characteristics are determined for alkali-activated slag (AAS) mortar specimens prepared using 4, 6, and 8 molar (4, 6, and 8 M) concentrations of sodium hydroxide in the alkaline activator. The different percentages of GO by weight of slag are 0.0, 0.03, 0.06, and 0.09%. The mechanical parameters considered are compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths. The durability parameters investigated are the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), sorptivity, and acid resistance. The performance of ambient-cured AAS mortar specimens containing GO is compared with thermalcured
AAS mortar specimens (without any GO inclusions) and the
control cement mortar (PC) to evaluate the effect of GO on the
mortar characteristics. The strength of AAS mortar is observed to be higher both with and without GO inclusions for the molarity of sodium hydroxide greater than 4 M. The mixture containing 0.06% GO with a 4 M activator is found to exhibit optimal mechanical and durability characteristics. Mineralogical, chemical, and microstructural investigations confirm that the addition of GO to the ambient-cured AAS accelerates the rate of hydration, even at a lower concentration of the activator (4 M) due to its high specific surface area and consequent formation of a greater number of nucleation sites. Hence, ambient-cured AAS mortar prepared using 4 M sodium hydroxide and 0.06% GO is recommended for practical use.
Related References:
1. Sanjuán, M. Á.; Andrade, C.; Mora, P.; and Zaragoza, A., “Carbon Dioxide Uptake by Cement-Based Materials: A Spanish Case Study,” Applied Sciences, V. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2020, Article No. 339.
2. Adak, D.; Sarkar, M.; and Mandal, S., “Effect of Nano-Silica on Strength and Durability of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 70, Nov. 2014, pp. 453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.093
3. Alnahhal, M. F.; Alengaram, U. J.; Jumaat, M. Z.; Alsubari, B.; Alqedra, M. A.; and Mo, K. H., “Effect of Aggressive Chemicals on Durability and Microstructure Properties of Concrete Containing Crushed New Concrete Aggregate and Non-Traditional Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 163, Feb. 2018, pp. 482-495. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.106
4. Yang, K.-H.; Song, J.-K.; and Song, K.-I., “Assessment of CO2 Reduction of Alkali-Activated Concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 39, Jan. 2013, pp. 265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.001
5. Adak, D.; Marbaniang, D. F.; and Dutta, S., “Experimental Studies on the Development of a Self-Healing Cementitious Matrix for Repair and Retrofitting of Concrete Structures,” International Journal of Structural Integrity, V. 12, No. 5, 2021, pp. 799-814. doi: 10.1108/IJSI-07-2021-0082
6. Shi, C.; Fernández Jiménez, A.; and Palomo, A., “New Cements for the 21st Century: The Pursuit of an Alternative to Portland Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 7, July 2011, pp. 750-763. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
7. Awoyera, P., and Adesina, A., “A Critical Review on Application of Alkali Activated Slag as a Sustainable Composite Binder,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, V. 11, Dec. 2019, Article No. e00268.
8. Zhao, K.; Liang, Y.; Ji, T.; Lu, Y.; and Lin, X., “Effect of Activator Types and Concentration of CO2 on the Steel Corrosion in the Carbonated Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 262, Nov. 2020, Article No. 120044.
9. Dejaeghere, I.; Sonebi, M.; and De Schutter, G., “Influence of Nano-Clay on Rheology, Fresh Properties, Heat of Hydration and Strength of Cement-Based Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 222, Oct. 2019, pp. 73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.111
10. Joshaghani, A.; Balapour, M.; Mashhadian, M.; and Ozbakkaloglu, T., “Effects of Nano-TiO2, Nano-Al2O3, and Nano-Fe2O3 on Rheology, Mechanical and Durability Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC): An Experimental Study,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 245, June 2020, Article No. 118444.
11. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shi, T.; Gu, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J.; Fu, Y.; and Shi, S., “Study of Mechanical Properties and Early-Stage Deformation Properties of Graphene-Modified Cement-Based Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 257, Oct. 2020, Article No. 119498.
12. Chuah, S.; Pan, Z.; Sanjayan, J. G.; Wang, C. M.; and Duan, W. H., “Nano Reinforced Cement and Concrete Composites and New Perspective from Graphene Oxide,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 73, Dec. 2014, pp. 113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.040
13. Lu, Z.; Hanif, A.; Ning, C.; Shao, H.; Yin, R.; and Li, Z., “Steric Stabilization of Graphene Oxide in Alkaline Cementitious Solutions: Mechanical Enhancement of Cement Composite,” Materials & Design, V. 127, Aug. 2017, pp. 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.083
14. Akarsh, P. K.; Marathe, S.; and Bhat, A. K., “Influence of Graphene Oxide on Properties of Concrete in the Presence of Silica Fumes and M-Sand,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 268, Jan. 2021, Article No. 121093. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121093
15. Devi, S. C., and Khan, R. A., “Effect of Graphene Oxide on Mechanical and Durability Performance of Concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 27, Jan. 2020, Article No. 101007.
16. Zhao, L.; Guo, X.; Song, L.; Song, Y.; Dai, G.; and Liu, J., “An Intensive Review on the Role of Graphene Oxide in Cement-Based Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 241, Apr. 2020, Article No. 117939. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117939
17. Mkhoyan, K. A.; Contryman, A. W.; Silcox, J.; Stewart, D. A.; Eda, G.; Mattevi, C.; Miller, S.; and Chhowalla, M., “Atomic and Electronic Structure of Graphene-Oxide,” Nano Letters, V. 9, No. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 1058-1063. doi: 10.1021/nl8034256
18. He, H.; Klinowski, J.; Forster, M.; and Lerf, A., “A New Structural Model for Graphite Oxide,” Chemical Physics Letters, V. 287, No. 1-2, Apr. 1998, pp. 53-56. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00144-4
19. Hou, D.; Zhao, T.; Ma, H.; and Li, Z., “Reactive Molecular Simulation on Water Confined in the Nanopores of the Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel: Structure, Reactivity, and Mechanical Properties,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, V. 119, No. 3, Jan. 2015, pp. 1346-1358. doi: 10.1021/jp509292q
20. Forati, T.; Atai, M.; Rashidi, A. M.; Imani, M.; and Behnamghader, A., “Physical and Mechanical Properties of Graphene Oxide/Polyethersulfone Nanocomposites,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, V. 25, No. 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 322-328. doi: 10.1002/pat.3243
21. Li, X.; Korayem, A. H.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; He, H.; Sanjayan, J. G.; and Duan, W. H., “Incorporation of Graphene Oxide and Silica Fume into Cement Paste: A Study of Dispersion and Compressive Strength,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 123, Oct. 2016, pp. 327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.022
22. Lu, Z.; Chen, B.; Leung, C. K. Y.; Li, Z.; and Sun, G., “Aggregation Size Effect of Graphene Oxide on Its Reinforcing Efficiency to Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 100, July 2019, pp. 85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.005
23. Zhao, L.; Guo, X.; Liu, Y.; Ge, C.; Chen, Z.; Guo, L.; Shu, X.; and Liu, J., “Investigation of Dispersion Behavior of GO Modified by Different Water Reducing Agents in Cement Pore Solution,” Carbon, V. 127, Feb. 2018, pp. 255-269. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.016
24. Roy, R.; Mitra, A.; Ganesh, A. T.; and Sairam, V., “Effect of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Dispersion in Cement Mortar Composites Incorporating Metakaolin and Silica Fume,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 186, Oct. 2018, pp. 514-524. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.135
25. Yang, H.; Monasterio, M.; Cui, H.; and Han, N., “Experimental Study of the Effects of Graphene Oxide on Microstructure and Properties of Cement Paste Composite,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, V. 102, Nov. 2017, pp. 263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.022
26. Jing, G.; Feng, H.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, S.; Cheng, X.; and Ye, Z., “Enhanced Dispersion of Graphene Oxide in Cement Matrix with Isolated-Dispersion Strategy,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, V. 59, No. 21, May 2020, pp. 10221-10228. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01230
27. Long, W.-J.; Li, H.-D.; Fang, C.-L.; and Xing, F., “Uniformly Dispersed and Re-Agglomerated Graphene Oxide-Based Cement Pastes: A Comparison of Rheological Properties, Mechanical Properties and Microstructure,” Nanomaterials, V. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2018, Article No. 31. doi: 10.3390/nano8010031
28. Ghazizadeh, S.; Duffour, P.; Skipper, N. T.; and Bai, Y., “Understanding the Behaviour of Graphene Oxide in Portland Cement Paste,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 111, Sept. 2018, pp. 169-182. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.016
29. Lu, Z.; Hou, D.; Hanif, A.; Hao, W.; Li, Z.; and Sun, G., “Comparative Evaluation on the Dispersion and Stability of Graphene Oxide in Water and Cement Pore Solution by Incorporating Silica Fume,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 94, Nov. 2018, pp. 33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.011
30. Zhu, X. H.; Kang, X. J.; Yang, K.; and Yang, C. H., “Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Mechanical Properties and the Formation of Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) in Alkali-Activated Slag Cement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 132, Feb. 2017, pp. 290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.059
31. Ho, V. D.; Gholampour, A.; Losic, D.; and Ozbakkaloglu, T., “Enhancing the Performance and Environmental Impact of Alkali-Activated Binder-Based Composites Containing Graphene Oxide and Industrial By-Products,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 284, May 2021, Article No. 122811. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122811
32. Thunuguntla, C. S., and Gunneswara Rao, T. D., “Effect of Mix Design Parameters on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Alkali Activated Slag Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 193, Dec. 2018, pp. 173-188. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.189
33. Shariati, M.; Shariati, A.; Trung, N. T.; Shoaei, P.; Ameri, F.; Bahrami, N.; and Zamanabadi, S. N., “Alkali-Activated Slag (AAS) Paste: Correlation between Durability and Microstructural Characteristics,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 267, Jan. 2021, Article No. 120886.
34. Jiang, M.; Chen, X.; Rajabipour, F.; and Hendrickson, C. T., “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional, Glass Powder, and Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete and Mortar,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, V. 20, No. 4, Dec. 2014, p. 04014020. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000211
35. ASTM C989/C989M-18, “Standard Specification for Slag Cement for Use in Concrete and Mortars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 7 pp.
36. ASTM C150/C150M-16, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.
37. IS 8112:2013, “Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement (Second Revision),” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2013, 17 pp.
38. ASTM C33/C33M-08, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, 11 pp.
39. IS 4031-6:1988, “Methods Of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part 6: Determination of Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement (Other than Masonry Cement) (First Revision),” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2005, 11 pp.
40. ASTM C348-20, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 6 pp.
41. ASTM C496/C496M-17, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 5 pp.
42. ASTM C1202-12, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 8 pp.
43. ASTM C1585-13, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 6 pp.
44. Rangan, B. V.; Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S. E.; and Sumajouw, D. M. J., “Studies on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Geopolymer, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development Solutions: Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer 2005, J. Davidovits, ed., Saint-Quentin, France, 2005, pp. 133-137.
45. Wardhono, A., “The Effect of Sodium Hydroxide Molarity on Strength Development of Non-Cement Class C Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V. 947, 2018, Article No. 012001.
46. Tran, T. T.; Kang, H.; and Kwon, H.-M., “Effect of Heat Curing Method on the Mechanical Strength of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar after High-Temperature Exposure,” Materials (Basel), V. 12, No. 11, June 2019, Article No. 1789. doi: 10.3390/ma12111789
47. Chi, M.-C.; Chang, J.-J.; and Huang, R., “Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Slag Paste and Mortar,” Advances in Civil Engineering, V. 2012, 2012, Article No. 579732.
48. Indukuri, C. S. R.; Nerella, R.; and Madduru, S. R. C., “Effect of Graphene Oxide on Microstructure and Strengthened Properties of Fly Ash and Silica Fume Based Cement Composites,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 229, Dec. 2019, Article No. 116863. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116863
49. Bhardwaj, B., and Kumar, P., “Performance Assessment of Graphene Oxide–Reinforced Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 33, No. 11, Nov. 2021, p. 04021322. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003942
50. Peng, H.; Ge, Y.; Cai, C. S.; Zhang, Y.; and Liu, Z., “Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Graphene Oxide Cement-Based Composites,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 194, Jan. 2019, pp. 102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.234
51. Al Safi, A. A., “Blast Furnace Slag-Based Geopolymer Mortars Cured at Different Conditions: Modeling and Optimization of Compressive Strength,” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, V. 25, No. 11, 2021, pp. 1949-1961. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2019.1598502
52. Bakharev, T.; Sanjayan, J. G.; and Cheng, Y.-B., “Effect of Elevated Temperature Curing on Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 10, Oct. 1999, pp. 1619-1625. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00143-X
53. Luga, E., and Atis, C. D., “Optimization of Heat Cured Fly Ash/Slag Blend Geopolymer Mortars Designed by ‘Combined Design’ Method: Part 1,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 178, July 2018, pp. 393-404. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.140
54. Ranjbar, N.; Mehrali, M.; Mehrali, M.; Alengaram, U. J.; and Jumaat, M. Z., “Graphene Nanoplatelet-Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Composites,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 76, Oct. 2015, pp. 222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.06.003
55. Atiş, C. D.; Bilim, C.; Çelik, Ö.; and Karahan, O., “Influence of Activator on the Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.011
56. Bellum, R. R.; Muniraj, K.; Indukuri, C. S. R.; and Madduru, S. R. C., “Investigation on Performance Enhancement of Fly Ash-GGBFS Based Graphene Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 32, Nov. 2020, Article No. 101659. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101659
57. Manikanta, D.; Ravella, D. P.; M., S. R. C.; and M., J. Y., “Mechanical and Durability Characteristics of High Performance Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Flyash, Silica Fume and Graphene Oxide,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 43, Part 2, 2021, pp. 2361-2367. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.684
58. Brown, P. W., and Bothe, J. V. Jr., “The Stability of Ettringite,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 5, No. 18, Apr. 1993, pp. 47-63. doi: 10.1680/adcr.1993.5.18.47
59. Özkök, E.; Davis, A. P.; and Aydilek, A. H., “Ettringite and Monosulfate Formation to Reduce Alkalinity in Reactions of Alum-Based Water Treatment Residual with Steel Slag,” Waste Management, V. 84, Feb. 2019, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.018
60. Liu, C.; Huang, X.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Deng, X.; Liu, J.; Zheng, Z.; and Hui, D., “Review on the Research Progress of Cement-Based and Geopolymer Materials Modified by Graphene and Graphene Oxide,” Nanotechnology Reviews, V. 9, No. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 155-169. doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0014
61. Bakharev, T.; Sanjayan, J. G.; and Cheng, Y.-B., “Resistance of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete to Carbonation,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 9, Sept. 2001, pp. 1277-1283. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00574-9
62. Mobasher, N.; Bernal, S. A.; and Provis, J. L., “Structural Evolution of an Alkali Sulfate Activated Slag Cement,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, V. 468, Jan. 2016, pp. 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.016
63. Ye, H.; Cai, R.; and Tian, Z., “Natural Carbonation-Induced Phase and Molecular Evolution of Alkali-Activated Slag: Effect of Activator Composition and Curing Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 248, July 2020, Article No. 118726. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118726
64. Ramagiri, K. K., and Kar, A., “Effect of High-Temperature on the Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Binder,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 28, Part 2, 2020, pp. 1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.093
65. Sankar, K.; Stynoski, P.; and Kriven, W. M., “Sodium Silicate Activated Slag-Fly Ash Binders: Part III—Composition of Soft Gel and Calorimetry,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 102, No. 6, June 2019, pp. 3175-3190. doi: 10.1111/jace.16219
66. Aragaw, T. A., “Concise Introduction to Cement Chemistry and Manufacturing,” Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, Science, and Technology, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-79386-8